Intramedullary rod insertion places the femoral component more laterally during Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

IF 4.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Toshikazu Tanaka, Yoshihito Suda, Tomoyuki Kamenaga, Akira Saito, Takaaki Fujishiro, Koji Okamoto, Takafumi Hiranaka
{"title":"Intramedullary rod insertion places the femoral component more laterally during Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Toshikazu Tanaka,&nbsp;Yoshihito Suda,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kamenaga,&nbsp;Akira Saito,&nbsp;Takaaki Fujishiro,&nbsp;Koji Okamoto,&nbsp;Takafumi Hiranaka","doi":"10.1186/s43019-022-00171-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the influence of intramedullary rods on the implantation positions of femoral components using Microplasty instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that femoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly when using intramedullary rods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included all 45 consecutive patients (53 knees) who underwent Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery for anteromedial osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee at our hospital during the study period. A custom-made toolset comprising a triangular caliper and circular trial bearings was used to evaluate the distance between the bearing and the vertical wall of the tibia implant (wall-bearing space) using the caliper at 90° flexion both with and without intramedullary rods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wall-bearing space was significantly larger when the intramedullary rod was used than when intramedullary rod was not used (1.8 ± 1.1 mm versus 3.4 ± 1.2 mm, P < 0.001). The mean difference of wall-bearing space with and without intramedullary rod was 1.6 ± 0.7 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Femoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly by an average of 1.6 mm when using intramedullary rods. The wall-bearing space should be evaluated using trial components, and if the relationship is improper, it should be corrected before keel slot preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00171-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the influence of intramedullary rods on the implantation positions of femoral components using Microplasty instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that femoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly when using intramedullary rods.

Methods: This prospective study included all 45 consecutive patients (53 knees) who underwent Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery for anteromedial osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee at our hospital during the study period. A custom-made toolset comprising a triangular caliper and circular trial bearings was used to evaluate the distance between the bearing and the vertical wall of the tibia implant (wall-bearing space) using the caliper at 90° flexion both with and without intramedullary rods.

Results: The wall-bearing space was significantly larger when the intramedullary rod was used than when intramedullary rod was not used (1.8 ± 1.1 mm versus 3.4 ± 1.2 mm, P < 0.001). The mean difference of wall-bearing space with and without intramedullary rod was 1.6 ± 0.7 mm.

Conclusions: Femoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly by an average of 1.6 mm when using intramedullary rods. The wall-bearing space should be evaluated using trial components, and if the relationship is improper, it should be corrected before keel slot preparation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在牛津内侧单室膝关节置换术中,髓内棒的插入使股骨假体更外侧。
背景:本研究旨在评估在牛津单腔膝关节置换术中,髓内棒对股骨假体植入位置的影响。我们假设当使用髓内棒时,股骨假体可能不正确地向外侧植入。方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了研究期间在我院接受牛津单室膝关节置换术治疗前内侧骨关节炎或自发性膝关节骨坏死的所有45例患者(53个膝关节)。使用定制的工具集,包括三角形卡尺和圆形试验轴承,在有或没有髓内棒的情况下,使用卡尺在90°屈曲时评估轴承与胫骨植入物垂直壁面(壁面空间)之间的距离。结果:使用髓内棒时,股骨假体的承载空间明显大于未使用髓内棒时(1.8±1.1 mm比3.4±1.2 mm), P结论:使用髓内棒时,股骨假体外侧平均不正确植入1.6 mm。应使用试验构件评估墙体承重空间,如果关系不当,应在龙骨槽准备前进行纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信