Antibiotic resistance surveillance of Klebsiella pneumoniae complex is affected by refined MALDI-TOF identification, Swiss data, 2017 to 2022.

Irene Katharina Voellmy, Claudia Lang, Michael Gasser, Andreas Kronenberg
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance surveillance of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> complex is affected by refined MALDI-TOF identification, Swiss data, 2017 to 2022.","authors":"Irene Katharina Voellmy,&nbsp;Claudia Lang,&nbsp;Michael Gasser,&nbsp;Andreas Kronenberg","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.45.2200104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundModern laboratory methods such as next generation sequencing and MALDI-TOF allow identification of novel bacterial species. This can affect surveillance of infections and antimicrobial resistance. From 2017, increasing numbers of medical microbiology laboratories in Switzerland differentiated <i>Klebsiella variicola</i> from <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> complex using updated MALDI-TOF databases, whereas many laboratories still report them as <i>K. pneumoniae</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex.AimOur study explored whether separate reporting of <i>K. variicola</i> and the <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> complex affected the ANRESIS surveillance database.MethodsWe analysed antibiotic susceptibility rates and specimen types of <i>K. variicola</i> and non-<i>K. variicola</i>-<i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex isolates reported by Swiss medical laboratories to the ANRESIS database (Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance) from January 2017 to June 2022.ResultsAnalysis of Swiss antimicrobial resistance data revealed increased susceptibility rates of <i>K. variicola</i> compared with species of the <i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex other than <i>K. variicola</i> in all six antibiotic classes tested. This can lead to underestimated resistance rates of <i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex in laboratories that do not specifically identify <i>K. variicola</i>. Furthermore, <i>K. variicola</i> strains were significantly more often reported from blood and primarily sterile specimens than isolates of the <i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex other than <i>K. variicola,</i> indicating increased invasiveness of <i>K. variicola</i>.ConclusionOur data suggest that refined differentiation of the <i>K. pneumoniae</i> complex can improve our understanding of its taxonomy, susceptibility, epidemiology and clinical significance, thus providing more precise information to clinicians and epidemiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":520613,"journal":{"name":"Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650708/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.45.2200104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BackgroundModern laboratory methods such as next generation sequencing and MALDI-TOF allow identification of novel bacterial species. This can affect surveillance of infections and antimicrobial resistance. From 2017, increasing numbers of medical microbiology laboratories in Switzerland differentiated Klebsiella variicola from Klebsiella pneumoniae complex using updated MALDI-TOF databases, whereas many laboratories still report them as K. pneumoniae or K. pneumoniae complex.AimOur study explored whether separate reporting of K. variicola and the Klebsiella pneumoniae complex affected the ANRESIS surveillance database.MethodsWe analysed antibiotic susceptibility rates and specimen types of K. variicola and non-K. variicola-K. pneumoniae complex isolates reported by Swiss medical laboratories to the ANRESIS database (Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance) from January 2017 to June 2022.ResultsAnalysis of Swiss antimicrobial resistance data revealed increased susceptibility rates of K. variicola compared with species of the K. pneumoniae complex other than K. variicola in all six antibiotic classes tested. This can lead to underestimated resistance rates of K. pneumoniae complex in laboratories that do not specifically identify K. variicola. Furthermore, K. variicola strains were significantly more often reported from blood and primarily sterile specimens than isolates of the K. pneumoniae complex other than K. variicola, indicating increased invasiveness of K. variicola.ConclusionOur data suggest that refined differentiation of the K. pneumoniae complex can improve our understanding of its taxonomy, susceptibility, epidemiology and clinical significance, thus providing more precise information to clinicians and epidemiologists.

Abstract Image

瑞士数据,2017年至2022年改进MALDI-TOF鉴定对肺炎克雷伯菌复合体抗生素耐药性监测的影响
现代实验室方法,如下一代测序和MALDI-TOF允许鉴定新的细菌种类。这可能影响对感染和抗菌素耐药性的监测。从2017年开始,瑞士越来越多的医学微生物实验室使用更新的MALDI-TOF数据库将克雷伯菌与肺炎克雷伯菌复合体区分开来,而许多实验室仍将其报告为肺炎克雷伯菌或肺炎克雷伯菌复合体。我们的研究探讨了分别报告水痘克雷伯菌和肺炎克雷伯菌复合体是否影响ANRESIS监测数据库。方法对不同感染类型的猪天花菌和非猪天花菌进行抗生素敏感性分析。variicola-K。2017年1月至2022年6月,瑞士医学实验室向ANRESIS数据库(瑞士抗生素耐药性中心)报告的肺炎复合菌分离株。结果瑞士抗菌素耐药数据分析显示,在所有六种抗生素类别中,与肺炎克雷伯菌复群物种相比,variicola的敏感性均高于variicola。这可能导致在没有专门鉴定天花克雷伯菌的实验室中,肺炎克雷伯菌复合体的耐药率被低估。此外,与肺炎克雷伯菌复合体的分离株相比,从血液和主要无菌标本中报告的水痘克雷伯菌株明显更多,这表明水痘克雷伯菌的侵袭性增强。结论肺炎克雷伯菌复合体的精细化分化可以提高我们对其分类、易感性、流行病学和临床意义的认识,从而为临床医生和流行病学家提供更准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信