Visualization of Ray Propagation through Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.

IF 3.3
Isabella D Baur, Gerd U Auffarth, Weijia Yan, Grzegorz Łabuz, Ramin Khoramnia
{"title":"Visualization of Ray Propagation through Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.","authors":"Isabella D Baur,&nbsp;Gerd U Auffarth,&nbsp;Weijia Yan,&nbsp;Grzegorz Łabuz,&nbsp;Ramin Khoramnia","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics12112667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) models differ in their optical design and performance. In the laboratory, we compared the ray propagation and light intensity profiles of four IOLs: the non-diffractive AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) and two diffractive models, Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA) and AT Lara 829 MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Berlin, Germany). A fourth lens, the monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF (Alcon Inc.) acted as the control. We projected a 520 nm laser light through each submerged lens in a bath of fluorescein solution. A camera mounted on a microscope captured the light that emerged from the IOL. We recorded the IOLs' point spread function (PSF) to determine the presence of unwanted visual effects. The ray propagation visualization and light intensity profile of the monofocal control showed one distinct focus, while the AcrySof IQ Vivity demonstrated an extended focus area. We observed two distinct foci with each diffractive IOL. We found a lower level of light spread beyond the PSF center for the AcrySof IQ Vivity compared to the diffractive IOLs. In conclusion, we could confirm the extended range of focus for all the EDoF IOL models. However, the non-diffractive AcrySof IQ Vivity appears to have a smoother transition from a far to an intermediate range. We discuss whether, in clinical use, the higher level of spurious light we found in the diffractive designs may translate into increased dysphotopsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520604,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689910/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) models differ in their optical design and performance. In the laboratory, we compared the ray propagation and light intensity profiles of four IOLs: the non-diffractive AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) and two diffractive models, Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA) and AT Lara 829 MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Berlin, Germany). A fourth lens, the monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF (Alcon Inc.) acted as the control. We projected a 520 nm laser light through each submerged lens in a bath of fluorescein solution. A camera mounted on a microscope captured the light that emerged from the IOL. We recorded the IOLs' point spread function (PSF) to determine the presence of unwanted visual effects. The ray propagation visualization and light intensity profile of the monofocal control showed one distinct focus, while the AcrySof IQ Vivity demonstrated an extended focus area. We observed two distinct foci with each diffractive IOL. We found a lower level of light spread beyond the PSF center for the AcrySof IQ Vivity compared to the diffractive IOLs. In conclusion, we could confirm the extended range of focus for all the EDoF IOL models. However, the non-diffractive AcrySof IQ Vivity appears to have a smoother transition from a far to an intermediate range. We discuss whether, in clinical use, the higher level of spurious light we found in the diffractive designs may translate into increased dysphotopsia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过大聚焦深度人工晶状体的射线传播可视化。
延长焦距(EDoF)的老花眼矫正人工晶状体(IOL)模型在光学设计和性能上有所不同。在实验室中,我们比较了四种iol的光线传播和光强度分布:非衍射AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA)和两种衍射型号,Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA)和AT Lara 829 MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Berlin, Germany)。第四个镜头,单焦点acryysofiq SN60WF(爱尔康公司)作为对照。我们将520纳米的激光投射到每个浸泡在荧光素溶液中的透镜上。安装在显微镜上的照相机捕捉到了从人工晶体中发出的光。我们记录人工晶状体的点扩散函数(PSF)以确定是否存在不必要的视觉效果。单焦点控制的光线传播可视化和光强分布图显示出一个明显的焦点,而AcrySof IQ Vivity则显示出一个扩展的焦点区域。我们观察到两个不同的焦点与每个衍射IOL。我们发现,与衍射iol相比,acrys IQ Vivity的PSF中心外的光传播水平较低。综上所述,我们可以证实所有的EDoF人工晶状体模型都有扩大的聚焦范围。然而,非衍射的acrysofiq活跃度似乎有一个平滑的过渡,从远到中间范围。我们讨论是否,在临床使用中,较高水平的杂散光,我们发现在衍射设计可能转化为增加的失光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书