How to measure multidimensional quality of life of persons with disabilities in public policies - a case of Poland.

Izabela Grabowska, Radosław Antczak, Jan Zwierzchowski, Tomasz Panek
{"title":"How to measure multidimensional quality of life of persons with disabilities in public policies - a case of Poland.","authors":"Izabela Grabowska,&nbsp;Radosław Antczak,&nbsp;Jan Zwierzchowski,&nbsp;Tomasz Panek","doi":"10.1186/s13690-022-00981-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this paper is to construct a tool that can be used to measure multidimensional quality of life of persons with disabilities in comparison with population without disabilities for the purpose of monitoring of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in Poland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Sen's capability approach was applied to conceptualize the quality of life in various life domains. We followed guidelines of The Quality of Life Framework developed within the European Statistical System on choosing the life domains in which the QoL should be measured. The QoL scores in each domain (covered by the UNCRPD) were constructed using multiply indicators and multiple causes model (MIMIC). All analysis were based on 2018 EU-SILC data for Poland. We constructed quality of life indicators for population with and without disabilities and compared the differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persons without disability experienced higher QoL as compared to population with disabilities, overall and in various domains. Lower average QoL of persons with disabilities is a result of a lower share of those who experience high QoL. The biggest difference is observed for health and for productive and main activity domains. For material conditions and economic security and physical safety there was a moderate difference recorded. For the leisure and social relations domain there is almost no difference observed. Additionally, we identified diversified associations between such factors as age, gender, household situation, education, partner status, urbanization, health on the QoL across domains and analysed populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A tool developed in this paper can be calibrated to enable cross-country and in time comparisons between different populations and support evidenced-based social policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":365748,"journal":{"name":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","volume":" ","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647975/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00981-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aim of this paper is to construct a tool that can be used to measure multidimensional quality of life of persons with disabilities in comparison with population without disabilities for the purpose of monitoring of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in Poland.

Methods: The Sen's capability approach was applied to conceptualize the quality of life in various life domains. We followed guidelines of The Quality of Life Framework developed within the European Statistical System on choosing the life domains in which the QoL should be measured. The QoL scores in each domain (covered by the UNCRPD) were constructed using multiply indicators and multiple causes model (MIMIC). All analysis were based on 2018 EU-SILC data for Poland. We constructed quality of life indicators for population with and without disabilities and compared the differences.

Results: Persons without disability experienced higher QoL as compared to population with disabilities, overall and in various domains. Lower average QoL of persons with disabilities is a result of a lower share of those who experience high QoL. The biggest difference is observed for health and for productive and main activity domains. For material conditions and economic security and physical safety there was a moderate difference recorded. For the leisure and social relations domain there is almost no difference observed. Additionally, we identified diversified associations between such factors as age, gender, household situation, education, partner status, urbanization, health on the QoL across domains and analysed populations.

Conclusions: A tool developed in this paper can be calibrated to enable cross-country and in time comparisons between different populations and support evidenced-based social policy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

如何在公共政策中衡量残疾人的多维生活质量——波兰的一个案例。
背景:本文的目的是构建一个可以用来衡量残疾人与非残疾人人口多维生活质量的工具,以监测波兰《联合国残疾人权利公约》(UNCRPD)的实施情况。方法:应用森能力法对不同生活领域的生活质量进行概念化。我们遵循在欧洲统计系统内制定的生活质量框架的指导方针,选择应该衡量生活质量的生活领域。每个领域(UNCRPD涵盖)的生活质量评分采用多指标多原因模型(MIMIC)构建。所有分析都基于2018年欧盟- silc对波兰的数据。我们构建了残疾人和非残疾人的生活质量指标,并比较了两者的差异。结果:与残障人群相比,非残障人群总体上和各领域的生活质量都有所提高。残疾人平均生活质量较低的原因是生活质量高的人所占比例较低。最大的区别是在健康、生产和主要活动领域。在物质条件、经济安全和人身安全方面,记录了中等程度的差异。对于休闲和社会关系领域,几乎没有观察到差异。此外,我们确定了年龄、性别、家庭状况、教育、伴侣状况、城市化、健康等因素对各领域生活质量的影响,并分析了人口。结论:本文开发的工具可以进行校准,以便在不同人群之间进行跨国和及时的比较,并支持基于证据的社会政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信