Nursing informatics skills relevance and competence for final year nursing students.

Q2 Medicine
Jennifer Chipps, Loretta Le Roux, Jakobina Agabus, Million Bimerew
{"title":"Nursing informatics skills relevance and competence for final year nursing students.","authors":"Jennifer Chipps,&nbsp;Loretta Le Roux,&nbsp;Jakobina Agabus,&nbsp;Million Bimerew","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The increasing use of technology in nursing practice requires nursing students to be competent in nursing informatics with an attitude of acceptance of technology in the healthcare environment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The objectives of the study were to determine final year nursing students' perceptions and skills in nursing informatics and their attitudes towards computerisation in nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> The study population were 198 final year nursing students from a selected university in the Western Cape, South Africa. All-inclusive sampling was used. A descriptive survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire which included two validated scales, namely the validated Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment Tool (NICAT) and the Nurses' Attitudes towards Computerisation scale. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the ratings of the perceived relevance of nursing informatics skills in nursing practice, perceived levels of competence in nursing informatics skills and attitudes towards computers were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 91 undergraduate respondents completed the survey. Computer literacy skills were rated overall as most relevant (4.23, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.06-4.40) and the skills perceived most competent (4.16, 95% CI: 3.81-4.22). The respondents had an overall positive score for attitudes towards computerisation in healthcare (67.34, s.d. = 10.40, 95% CI: 65.18-69.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The study concluded that computer literacy skills, informatics literacy skills and information management skills were relevant to nursing practice, despite varying levels of competence in these skills among nurses.Contribution: What key insights into the research results and its future function are revealed? How do these insights link to the focus and scope of the journal? It should be a concise statement of the primary contribution of the manuscript; and how it fits within the scope of the journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The increasing use of technology in nursing practice requires nursing students to be competent in nursing informatics with an attitude of acceptance of technology in the healthcare environment.

Objectives:  The objectives of the study were to determine final year nursing students' perceptions and skills in nursing informatics and their attitudes towards computerisation in nursing practice.

Method:  The study population were 198 final year nursing students from a selected university in the Western Cape, South Africa. All-inclusive sampling was used. A descriptive survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire which included two validated scales, namely the validated Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment Tool (NICAT) and the Nurses' Attitudes towards Computerisation scale. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the ratings of the perceived relevance of nursing informatics skills in nursing practice, perceived levels of competence in nursing informatics skills and attitudes towards computers were calculated.

Results:  A total of 91 undergraduate respondents completed the survey. Computer literacy skills were rated overall as most relevant (4.23, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.06-4.40) and the skills perceived most competent (4.16, 95% CI: 3.81-4.22). The respondents had an overall positive score for attitudes towards computerisation in healthcare (67.34, s.d. = 10.40, 95% CI: 65.18-69.51).

Conclusion:  The study concluded that computer literacy skills, informatics literacy skills and information management skills were relevant to nursing practice, despite varying levels of competence in these skills among nurses.Contribution: What key insights into the research results and its future function are revealed? How do these insights link to the focus and scope of the journal? It should be a concise statement of the primary contribution of the manuscript; and how it fits within the scope of the journal.

Abstract Image

护理信息学技能的相关性和能力的最后一年护理学生。
背景:护理实践中越来越多地使用技术,要求护生在医疗环境中具有接受技术的态度,能够胜任护理信息学。目的:研究的目的是确定护理专业毕业班学生对护理信息学的认知和技能,以及他们对护理实践中计算机化的态度。方法:研究对象为198名来自南非西开普省一所大学的护理专业毕业班学生。采用全包抽样。描述性调查使用自我管理问卷进行,其中包括两个有效的量表,即有效的护理信息学能力评估工具(NICAT)和护士对计算机化的态度量表。计算护理信息学技能在护理实践中的感知相关性评分的平均值和95%置信区间(CI),护理信息学技能的感知能力水平和对计算机的态度。结果:共有91名大学生完成了调查。总体而言,计算机素养技能被评为最相关(4.23,95%可信区间[95% CI]: 4.06-4.40)和最胜任的技能(4.16,95% CI: 3.81-4.22)。受访者对医疗保健电脑化的态度总体得分为正(67.34,标准差= 10.40,95% CI: 65.18-69.51)。结论:本研究得出结论,计算机素养技能、信息学素养技能和信息管理技能与护理实践相关,尽管护士在这些技能方面的能力水平不同。贡献:揭示了对研究结果及其未来功能的关键见解?这些见解如何与期刊的焦点和范围联系起来?它应该是对手稿主要贡献的简明陈述;以及它如何符合期刊的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信