Neurophysiological Findings in Critical COVID-19 Patients With Peripheral Nervous System Manifestations.

Susana Santiago-Pérez, Sandra Espinosa-García, Almudena Martínez-Pérez, Erika Herráez-Sánchez, Cristian Rizea, Lilia Alejandrina Ruiz-Ávila
{"title":"Neurophysiological Findings in Critical COVID-19 Patients With Peripheral Nervous System Manifestations.","authors":"Susana Santiago-Pérez,&nbsp;Sandra Espinosa-García,&nbsp;Almudena Martínez-Pérez,&nbsp;Erika Herráez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Cristian Rizea,&nbsp;Lilia Alejandrina Ruiz-Ávila","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 patients hospitalized in intensive care units develop neuromuscular manifestations. However, to our knowledge, a study describing the neurophysiological findings in these patients has not been reported. The objective of this study was to diagnose the cause of neuromuscular deficit in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients, through neurophysiological examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, observational case series. Data were collected from April 13, 2020, to May 31, 2020. Twenty-two coronavirus disease 2019 patients with generalized neuromuscular deficit during intensive care unit hospitalization were studied. Neurophysiological examinations included motor and sensory peripheral nerve conductions, needle electromyography, F waves, and repetitive nerve stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects were 14 men (63.6%) and eight women, ranged from 35 to 74 years old (58.0, interquartile ranges 50.7-66.2). Intensive care unit hospitalization time ranged from 14 to 82 days (median 37.5, interquartile ranges 22.7-55.0). Through neurophysiological examination, myopathy was diagnosed in 17 patients (77.3%) and polyneuropathy in four (18.2%). Focal neuropathies were diagnosed in 12 patients (54.6%), with a total of 19 affected nerves. Common peroneal nerve lesions at the fibular head (68.4%) and ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow level (21.1%) were the most frequent locations. No significant differences were established between neurophysiological findings and clinical or analytical data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients with neuromuscular complaints, neurophysiological examination provides an accurate diagnosis-useful to select treatment measures and establish the prognosis of recovery. Neurophysiological findings are similar to those described for critical illness neuromuscular disease, with myopathy being the most frequent diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":117726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society","volume":" ","pages":"583-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 patients hospitalized in intensive care units develop neuromuscular manifestations. However, to our knowledge, a study describing the neurophysiological findings in these patients has not been reported. The objective of this study was to diagnose the cause of neuromuscular deficit in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients, through neurophysiological examination.

Methods: This is a retrospective, observational case series. Data were collected from April 13, 2020, to May 31, 2020. Twenty-two coronavirus disease 2019 patients with generalized neuromuscular deficit during intensive care unit hospitalization were studied. Neurophysiological examinations included motor and sensory peripheral nerve conductions, needle electromyography, F waves, and repetitive nerve stimulation.

Results: The subjects were 14 men (63.6%) and eight women, ranged from 35 to 74 years old (58.0, interquartile ranges 50.7-66.2). Intensive care unit hospitalization time ranged from 14 to 82 days (median 37.5, interquartile ranges 22.7-55.0). Through neurophysiological examination, myopathy was diagnosed in 17 patients (77.3%) and polyneuropathy in four (18.2%). Focal neuropathies were diagnosed in 12 patients (54.6%), with a total of 19 affected nerves. Common peroneal nerve lesions at the fibular head (68.4%) and ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow level (21.1%) were the most frequent locations. No significant differences were established between neurophysiological findings and clinical or analytical data.

Conclusions: In critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients with neuromuscular complaints, neurophysiological examination provides an accurate diagnosis-useful to select treatment measures and establish the prognosis of recovery. Neurophysiological findings are similar to those described for critical illness neuromuscular disease, with myopathy being the most frequent diagnosis.

伴有周围神经系统表现的COVID-19危重患者的神经生理学研究
2019冠状病毒病重症监护病房患者出现神经肌肉表现。然而,据我们所知,一项描述这些患者神经生理学发现的研究尚未报道。本研究的目的是通过神经生理检查诊断2019年严重冠状病毒病患者神经肌肉缺陷的原因。方法:这是一个回顾性的观察性病例系列。数据收集时间为2020年4月13日至2020年5月31日。对22例2019冠状病毒病患者在重症监护病房住院期间出现全身性神经肌肉缺陷进行了研究。神经生理学检查包括运动和感觉周围神经传导、针肌电图、F波和重复神经刺激。结果:男性14例(63.6%),女性8例,年龄35 ~ 74岁(58.0,四分位数间距50.7 ~ 66.2)。重症监护病房住院时间从14天到82天不等(中位数为37.5天,四分位数间距为22.7-55.0天)。经神经生理检查,17例(77.3%)诊断为肌病,4例(18.2%)诊断为多神经病变。12例(54.6%)患者被诊断为局灶性神经病变,共有19条神经受累。腓骨头腓总神经病变(68.4%)和肘部尺神经病变(21.1%)是最常见的部位。神经生理学结果与临床或分析数据之间无显著差异。结论:在新冠肺炎合并神经肌肉主诉的危重患者中,神经生理检查可提供准确的诊断,有助于选择治疗措施和建立康复预后。神经生理学的发现与危重疾病神经肌肉疾病的描述相似,其中肌病是最常见的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信