Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-04-08 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76
Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Amir Nejati, Hooman Hossein-Nejad, Seyed-Mohammad Mousavi, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Mona Arbab, Shahram Bagheri-Hariri
{"title":"Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini-Davarani,&nbsp;Amir Nejati,&nbsp;Hooman Hossein-Nejad,&nbsp;Seyed-Mohammad Mousavi,&nbsp;Mojtaba Sedaghat,&nbsp;Mona Arbab,&nbsp;Shahram Bagheri-Hariri","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patients' flow in the ED is termed triage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to investigate the validity and reliability of implementation of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system version 4 by triage nurses in an overcrowded referral hospital with more than 80000 patient admissions per year and an average emergency department occupancy rate of more than 80%.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma center with an emergency medicine residency program. Seven participating expert nurses were asked to assess the ESI level of patients in 30 written scenarios twice within a three-week interval to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Patients were randomly selected to participate in the study, and the triage level assigned by the nurses was compared with that by the emergency physicians. Finally, based on the patients' charts, an expert panel evaluated the validity of the triage level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 527 patients with mean age of 54 ± 7 years, including 253 (48%) women and 274 (52%) men, were assessed by seven trained triage nurses. The degree of retrograde agreement between the collaborated expert panel's evaluation and the actual triage scales by the nurses and physicians for all 5 levels was excellent, with the Cohen's weighted kappa being 0.966 (CI 0.985-0.946, p < 0.001) and 0.813 (CI 0.856-0.769, p<0.001), respectively. The intra-rater reliability was 0.94 (p < 0.0001), and the inter-rater reliability for all the nurses was in perfect agreement with the test result (Cohen's weighted kappa were as follows: 0.919, 0.956, 0.911, 0.955, 0.860, 0.956, and 0.868; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings showed that there was perfect reliability and, overall, almost perfect validity for the triage performed by the studied nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 3","pages":"e32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/60/AJEM-2-e32.PMC6549196.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patients' flow in the ED is termed triage.

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the validity and reliability of implementation of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system version 4 by triage nurses in an overcrowded referral hospital with more than 80000 patient admissions per year and an average emergency department occupancy rate of more than 80%.

Method: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma center with an emergency medicine residency program. Seven participating expert nurses were asked to assess the ESI level of patients in 30 written scenarios twice within a three-week interval to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Patients were randomly selected to participate in the study, and the triage level assigned by the nurses was compared with that by the emergency physicians. Finally, based on the patients' charts, an expert panel evaluated the validity of the triage level.

Results: During the study period, 527 patients with mean age of 54 ± 7 years, including 253 (48%) women and 274 (52%) men, were assessed by seven trained triage nurses. The degree of retrograde agreement between the collaborated expert panel's evaluation and the actual triage scales by the nurses and physicians for all 5 levels was excellent, with the Cohen's weighted kappa being 0.966 (CI 0.985-0.946, p < 0.001) and 0.813 (CI 0.856-0.769, p<0.001), respectively. The intra-rater reliability was 0.94 (p < 0.0001), and the inter-rater reliability for all the nurses was in perfect agreement with the test result (Cohen's weighted kappa were as follows: 0.919, 0.956, 0.911, 0.955, 0.860, 0.956, and 0.868; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study findings showed that there was perfect reliability and, overall, almost perfect validity for the triage performed by the studied nurses.

急诊科入院分诊等级评分者基于结果的有效性和可靠性评估:一项横断面研究。
引言:急诊科(ED)通常是为非紧急到危重情况下的患者提供医疗服务的第一线,必要时提供住院服务。有必要建立一个动态系统来评估患者并分配优先级。这种便于患者在急诊室流动的结构被称为分诊。目的:本研究旨在调查一家过度拥挤的转诊医院的分诊护士实施紧急情况严重程度指数(ESI)系统第4版的有效性和可靠性,该医院每年有80000多名患者入院,急诊科平均入住率超过80%教学医院和创伤中心的急诊医学住院计划。七名参与的专家护士被要求在三周内两次评估30个书面场景中患者的ESI水平,以评估评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。随机选择患者参与研究,并将护士分配的分诊级别与急诊医生分配的分检级别进行比较。最后,根据患者的图表,专家小组评估了分诊水平的有效性。结果:在研究期间,527名平均年龄为54±7岁的患者,包括253名(48%)女性和274名(52%)男性,由7名受过培训的分诊护士进行了评估。协作专家小组的评估与护士和医生对所有5个级别的实际分诊量表之间的逆向一致程度非常好,Cohen加权kappa分别为0.966(CI 0.985-0.946,p<0.001)和0.813(CI 0.856-0.769,p结论:研究结果表明,研究护士进行的分诊具有完全的可靠性,总体而言,几乎完全的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信