Assessing the effect of arrival time of physician and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) team on the outcome of CPR.

Q2 Medicine
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science Pub Date : 2020-09-16 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1556/1646.10.2018.33
Ebrahim Ezzati, Saeed Mohammadi, Hassanali Karimpour, Javad Amini Saman, Afshin Goodarzi, Amir Jalali, Afshin Almasi, Kamran Vafaei, Rasool Kawyannejad
{"title":"Assessing the effect of arrival time of physician and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) team on the outcome of CPR.","authors":"Ebrahim Ezzati,&nbsp;Saeed Mohammadi,&nbsp;Hassanali Karimpour,&nbsp;Javad Amini Saman,&nbsp;Afshin Goodarzi,&nbsp;Amir Jalali,&nbsp;Afshin Almasi,&nbsp;Kamran Vafaei,&nbsp;Rasool Kawyannejad","doi":"10.1556/1646.10.2018.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Negligence of proper time and poor performance of resuscitation team can lead to more mortality and negative consequences of cardiac arrest, as well as less survival. This study was conducted with objective of determining the arrival time of physician and resuscitation team to survive the victims of cardiopulmonary arrest.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective and descriptive-analytic study, the resuscitation performance and the arrival time of resuscitation team in 143 inpatients who had been diagnosed with witnessed cardiopulmonary arrest were examined using a researcher-made checklist. Data analysis was performed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests and SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial survival rate was 26.6%. In general, the mean time of physician's presence after the code announcement in minutes and seconds was 02:31 ± 01:22. It was also 02:24 ± 01:15 in successful cases and 02:34 ± 01:25 in unsuccessful cases. Independent <i>t</i>-test did not show a significant difference between the physician's presence time and the rate of initial successful resuscitation (<i>p</i> = 0.504). The time of first shock after observing ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (in minutes and seconds) was 01:30 ± 00:47. According to independent <i>t</i>-test, the aforementioned time was less than the mean time (02:31 ± 01:22) of physician's presence (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the initial survival rate in comparison to other regions in the country was almost more favorable and it was similar to global norms. In this study, the starting time of resuscitation was within the acceptable range. There was no relationship between the presence of physician and the initial survival rate of patients, as well as the use of defibrillator (by physician compared to other team members) and intubation with the initial survival rate. This could indicate the adequate performance of resuscitation team in the absence of physician on the condition of having sufficient knowledge and skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":"11 3","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/88/imas-11-139.PMC9467330.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Negligence of proper time and poor performance of resuscitation team can lead to more mortality and negative consequences of cardiac arrest, as well as less survival. This study was conducted with objective of determining the arrival time of physician and resuscitation team to survive the victims of cardiopulmonary arrest.

Materials and methods: In this prospective and descriptive-analytic study, the resuscitation performance and the arrival time of resuscitation team in 143 inpatients who had been diagnosed with witnessed cardiopulmonary arrest were examined using a researcher-made checklist. Data analysis was performed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests and SPSS.

Results: Initial survival rate was 26.6%. In general, the mean time of physician's presence after the code announcement in minutes and seconds was 02:31 ± 01:22. It was also 02:24 ± 01:15 in successful cases and 02:34 ± 01:25 in unsuccessful cases. Independent t-test did not show a significant difference between the physician's presence time and the rate of initial successful resuscitation (p = 0.504). The time of first shock after observing ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (in minutes and seconds) was 01:30 ± 00:47. According to independent t-test, the aforementioned time was less than the mean time (02:31 ± 01:22) of physician's presence (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this study, the initial survival rate in comparison to other regions in the country was almost more favorable and it was similar to global norms. In this study, the starting time of resuscitation was within the acceptable range. There was no relationship between the presence of physician and the initial survival rate of patients, as well as the use of defibrillator (by physician compared to other team members) and intubation with the initial survival rate. This could indicate the adequate performance of resuscitation team in the absence of physician on the condition of having sufficient knowledge and skill.

评估医师及心肺复苏术团队到达时间对心肺复苏术结果的影响。
导读:忽视适当的时机和复苏团队的不良表现会导致更高的死亡率和心脏骤停的负面后果,以及更低的生存率。本研究的目的是确定医生和复苏小组的到达时间,以使心肺骤停患者存活。材料和方法:在本前瞻性和描述性分析研究中,使用研究者自制的检查表对143例被诊断为目击心肺骤停的住院患者的复苏表现和复苏团队的到达时间进行了检查。数据分析采用参数和非参数统计检验及SPSS软件。结果:初始生存率为26.6%。一般情况下,编码公告后医师到场的平均时间(分、秒)为02:31±01:22。成功病例为02:24±01:15,不成功病例为02:34±01:25。独立t检验未显示医生在场时间与初始复苏成功率之间存在显著差异(p = 0.504)。观察室性颤动/心动过速后首次休克时间(分、秒)为01:30±00:47。经独立t检验,上述时间小于医师在场的平均时间(02:31±01:22)(p)。结论:本研究中,与国内其他地区相比,初始生存率几乎更有利,与全球标准相似。本研究中,复苏开始时间在可接受范围内。医生在场与患者的初始存活率之间没有关系,以及除颤器的使用(医生与其他团队成员相比)和插管与初始存活率之间没有关系。这可以表明在医生缺席的情况下,在具备足够的知识和技能的情况下,复苏团队的表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信