Educational Intervention Effect on Pain Management Quality in Emergency Department; a Clinical Audit.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-01-16 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.45
Maryam Janati, Hamid Kariman, Elham Memary, Elnaz Davarinezhad-Moghadam, Ali Arhami-Dolatabadi
{"title":"Educational Intervention Effect on Pain Management Quality in Emergency Department; a Clinical Audit.","authors":"Maryam Janati,&nbsp;Hamid Kariman,&nbsp;Elham Memary,&nbsp;Elnaz Davarinezhad-Moghadam,&nbsp;Ali Arhami-Dolatabadi","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is a frequent complaint of patients who are referred to the emergency department (ED), which is ignored or mismanaged and, almost always, approached in terms of determining the cause of pain instead of pain management. Pain management is a challenging issue in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to determine the effect of emergency resident's education about pain assessment and pain-relief drugs in the improvement in pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A clinical audit was carried out during the year 2015 in the ED of Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran. All patients over 16-year-old who had been complaining of pain or another complaint that included pain were eligible. Data were collected using a preformed checklist. One senior emergency medicine resident was responsible for filling the checklist. In the first phase, patients were enrolled into the study and were divided into two groups according to whether they had or did not have a pain management order. In the second phase, the first- and second-year emergency medicine residents were trained during the various classes that they were required to attend, through a workshop conducted by experienced professors, and based on existing valid guidelines. In the third phase, patients were enrolled into the study, and the same checklists were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 803 patients (401 before training and 402 after) were assessed. The mean age of the patients before and after training of the residents was 59.19 ± 44.45 and 40.24 ± 19.40 years, respectively. The demographic characteristics of patients were not significantly different before and after the training period (p > 0.05). The most common cause of pain was soft tissue injury, both before (36.3%) and after training (34.3%). The most frequent drug that was administered for pain control was morphine, both before (62.5%) and after (41.4%) training. Although the number of patients with moderate pain intensity was higher during the after-training period, pain control quality was described to be better in this group and success rate of pain control was significantly increased after training (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from the present study showed that there was a significant deficiency in pain management of the admitted patients, and the most common reason for this was the physician's fear of the drug's side effects. However, significant progress was seen after the training regarding pain management process in ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 2","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/ac/AJEM-2-e16.PMC6549047.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction: Pain is a frequent complaint of patients who are referred to the emergency department (ED), which is ignored or mismanaged and, almost always, approached in terms of determining the cause of pain instead of pain management. Pain management is a challenging issue in the ED.

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the effect of emergency resident's education about pain assessment and pain-relief drugs in the improvement in pain management.

Method: A clinical audit was carried out during the year 2015 in the ED of Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran. All patients over 16-year-old who had been complaining of pain or another complaint that included pain were eligible. Data were collected using a preformed checklist. One senior emergency medicine resident was responsible for filling the checklist. In the first phase, patients were enrolled into the study and were divided into two groups according to whether they had or did not have a pain management order. In the second phase, the first- and second-year emergency medicine residents were trained during the various classes that they were required to attend, through a workshop conducted by experienced professors, and based on existing valid guidelines. In the third phase, patients were enrolled into the study, and the same checklists were completed.

Results: A total of 803 patients (401 before training and 402 after) were assessed. The mean age of the patients before and after training of the residents was 59.19 ± 44.45 and 40.24 ± 19.40 years, respectively. The demographic characteristics of patients were not significantly different before and after the training period (p > 0.05). The most common cause of pain was soft tissue injury, both before (36.3%) and after training (34.3%). The most frequent drug that was administered for pain control was morphine, both before (62.5%) and after (41.4%) training. Although the number of patients with moderate pain intensity was higher during the after-training period, pain control quality was described to be better in this group and success rate of pain control was significantly increased after training (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Findings from the present study showed that there was a significant deficiency in pain management of the admitted patients, and the most common reason for this was the physician's fear of the drug's side effects. However, significant progress was seen after the training regarding pain management process in ED.

教育干预对急诊科疼痛管理质量的影响a临床审计。
简介:疼痛是就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者的常见主诉,但往往被忽视或处理不当,而且几乎总是在确定疼痛的原因而不是疼痛管理方面进行处理。疼痛管理是急诊科的一个难题。目的:本研究旨在探讨急诊住院医师关于疼痛评估和止痛药的教育对改善疼痛管理的作用。方法:对2015年伊朗德黑兰伊玛目侯赛因医院急诊科进行临床审计。所有16岁以上曾抱怨疼痛或其他抱怨包括疼痛的患者都符合条件。使用预先编制的检查表收集数据。一名高级急诊住院医师负责填写清单。在第一阶段,患者被纳入研究,并根据他们是否有疼痛管理命令分为两组。在第二阶段,一年级和二年级的急诊住院医师在他们必须参加的各种课程中接受培训,通过由经验丰富的教授主持的讲习班,并根据现有的有效指导方针。在第三阶段,患者被纳入研究,并完成了相同的检查清单。结果:共评估803例患者(训练前401例,训练后402例)。住院医师培训前后患者平均年龄分别为59.19±44.45岁和40.24±19.40岁。训练前后患者人口学特征差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。最常见的疼痛原因是软组织损伤,训练前(36.3%)和训练后(34.3%)均有。在训练前(62.5%)和训练后(41.4%),最常见的止痛药物是吗啡。虽然训练后中等疼痛强度患者数量较多,但该组疼痛控制质量较好,训练后疼痛控制成功率显著提高(p < 0.001)。结论:本研究结果表明,住院患者在疼痛管理方面存在明显不足,最常见的原因是医生对药物副作用的恐惧。然而,在急诊科的疼痛管理过程培训后,我们看到了显著的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信