Lymph Nodes With Germinal Centers Are Not Associated With Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

IF 1.9 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2022-10-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2632010X221132974
Ihsane El Otmani, Boubacar Effared, Fatima El Agy, Mohammed El Abkari, Khalid Mazaz, El Bachir Benjelloun, Abdelmalek Ousadden, Zineb Benbrahim, Touria Bouhafa, Laila Chbani
{"title":"Lymph Nodes With Germinal Centers Are Not Associated With Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Ihsane El Otmani,&nbsp;Boubacar Effared,&nbsp;Fatima El Agy,&nbsp;Mohammed El Abkari,&nbsp;Khalid Mazaz,&nbsp;El Bachir Benjelloun,&nbsp;Abdelmalek Ousadden,&nbsp;Zineb Benbrahim,&nbsp;Touria Bouhafa,&nbsp;Laila Chbani","doi":"10.1177/2632010X221132974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision as a standard of care. We aimed to explore the number, size, germinal centers, extracapsular invasion of lymph nodes (LN), and their impact on overall survival and disease free survival. Furthermore we also investigated the characteristics of lymph nodes in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and those who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2018. The count and measurement of lymph nodes was assessed by careful visual inspection and manual palpation. The predictive cut-off value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) was determined based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), method and the survival outcomes based on Kaplan-Meier curves. We found that the size and the number of lymph nodes decreased significantly after neoadjuvant treatment. The mean LN for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy was 12.68 ± 6.69 and for patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy was 16.29 ± 5.61 (<i>P</i> = .012). The average size for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery was 3.30 ± 1.10 versus 4.22 ± 1.18 mm for control group (surgery only) (<i>P</i> < .001), an LNR of 0.13 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 47%, AUC: 60%, 95% CI, 0.41%-0.76%) predicted recurrence and metastasis. Presence of lymph nodes with germinal centers was significantly associated with absence of vascular invasion, nodal tumor deposits, distant metastasis, and lower age group (<50 years). However there was no association seen between overall survival and relapse free, total number of lymph nodes enlarged and extracapsular invasion in positive nodes. Finally there is no association between lymph nodes with germinal centers and tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":53204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"2632010X221132974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/a2/10.1177_2632010X221132974.PMC9629553.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2632010X221132974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision as a standard of care. We aimed to explore the number, size, germinal centers, extracapsular invasion of lymph nodes (LN), and their impact on overall survival and disease free survival. Furthermore we also investigated the characteristics of lymph nodes in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and those who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2018. The count and measurement of lymph nodes was assessed by careful visual inspection and manual palpation. The predictive cut-off value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) was determined based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), method and the survival outcomes based on Kaplan-Meier curves. We found that the size and the number of lymph nodes decreased significantly after neoadjuvant treatment. The mean LN for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy was 12.68 ± 6.69 and for patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy was 16.29 ± 5.61 (P = .012). The average size for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery was 3.30 ± 1.10 versus 4.22 ± 1.18 mm for control group (surgery only) (P < .001), an LNR of 0.13 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 47%, AUC: 60%, 95% CI, 0.41%-0.76%) predicted recurrence and metastasis. Presence of lymph nodes with germinal centers was significantly associated with absence of vascular invasion, nodal tumor deposits, distant metastasis, and lower age group (<50 years). However there was no association seen between overall survival and relapse free, total number of lymph nodes enlarged and extracapsular invasion in positive nodes. Finally there is no association between lymph nodes with germinal centers and tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有生发中心的淋巴结与局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的肿瘤反应无关。
对于局部晚期直肠癌患者,新辅助放疗或放化疗后全肠系膜切除作为标准治疗。我们旨在探讨淋巴结(LN)的数量、大小、生发中心、囊外浸润及其对总生存期和无病生存期的影响。此外,我们还调查了2011年至2018年间接受新辅助治疗和接受手术的患者的淋巴结特征。通过仔细的目视检查和手触诊来评估淋巴结的计数和测量。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)、方法和Kaplan-Meier曲线的生存结果确定淋巴结比(LNR)的预测截断值。我们发现新辅助治疗后淋巴结的大小和数量明显减少。接受新辅助治疗的患者LN均值为12.68±6.69,未接受新辅助治疗的患者LN均值为16.29±5.61 (P = 0.012)。接受新辅助治疗后手术的患者的平均尺寸为3.30±1.10 mm,而对照组(仅手术)的平均尺寸为4.22±1.18 mm
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Pathology
Clinical Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信