A second demographic transition in Indonesia?

China population and development studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s42379-022-00115-y
Ariane Utomo, Aris Ananta, Diahhadi Setyonaluri, Calvin Aryaputra
{"title":"A second demographic transition in Indonesia?","authors":"Ariane Utomo,&nbsp;Aris Ananta,&nbsp;Diahhadi Setyonaluri,&nbsp;Calvin Aryaputra","doi":"10.1007/s42379-022-00115-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a predominantly Muslim and ethnically diverse new democracy in Asia, Indonesia is a timely case to study how the contending forces of development and social change are reflected in changing norms and practices around family formation. This paper examines the extent to which the second demographic transition (SDT) theory can provide a primary framework to understand contemporary patterns of fertility, marriage and family change in Indonesia. Against the backdrop of socio-political change following <i>Reformasi in</i> 1998, we found emerging demographic features typically associated with societies in later stages of fertility transition. These include fertility below replacement in some regions; increasing age at first marriage, non-marriage, and divorce rates; and growing diversity in household/family forms. As the vast regions of Indonesia is economically, culturally, and demographically heterogeneous, these key features of SDT are not likely to emerge and unfold in a uniform manner. Further, these demographic shifts are taking place amidst multiple tensions and contradictions in the nature and direction of ideational change pertaining to marriage and the family. We argue that the prevailing <i>ideational change</i> driving the shifts in marriage, fertility, and the family within Indonesia is neither unilinear nor singular in nature. Emerging ideational change embodying individualism, secularism, and post-materialism-originally proposed in SDT theory to be the primary drivers of fertility decline in post-industrial Western Europe-can overlap with popular values promoting de-secularization and the strengthening of familial institutions. As a demographic framework, the SDT theory is an important and useful starting point. But it needs to be reevaluated by considering the complex socio-political and increasingly precarious economic terrains behind fertility transition, as well as marriage and family change in post-<i>Reformasi</i> Indonesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72578,"journal":{"name":"China population and development studies","volume":"6 3","pages":"288-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589626/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China population and development studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-022-00115-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a predominantly Muslim and ethnically diverse new democracy in Asia, Indonesia is a timely case to study how the contending forces of development and social change are reflected in changing norms and practices around family formation. This paper examines the extent to which the second demographic transition (SDT) theory can provide a primary framework to understand contemporary patterns of fertility, marriage and family change in Indonesia. Against the backdrop of socio-political change following Reformasi in 1998, we found emerging demographic features typically associated with societies in later stages of fertility transition. These include fertility below replacement in some regions; increasing age at first marriage, non-marriage, and divorce rates; and growing diversity in household/family forms. As the vast regions of Indonesia is economically, culturally, and demographically heterogeneous, these key features of SDT are not likely to emerge and unfold in a uniform manner. Further, these demographic shifts are taking place amidst multiple tensions and contradictions in the nature and direction of ideational change pertaining to marriage and the family. We argue that the prevailing ideational change driving the shifts in marriage, fertility, and the family within Indonesia is neither unilinear nor singular in nature. Emerging ideational change embodying individualism, secularism, and post-materialism-originally proposed in SDT theory to be the primary drivers of fertility decline in post-industrial Western Europe-can overlap with popular values promoting de-secularization and the strengthening of familial institutions. As a demographic framework, the SDT theory is an important and useful starting point. But it needs to be reevaluated by considering the complex socio-political and increasingly precarious economic terrains behind fertility transition, as well as marriage and family change in post-Reformasi Indonesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

印尼的第二次人口转型?
作为一个以穆斯林为主、种族多元化的亚洲新兴民主国家,印度尼西亚是一个及时的案例,可以用来研究发展和社会变革的竞争力量如何反映在围绕家庭形成的不断变化的规范和实践中。本文考察了第二次人口转型(SDT)理论在多大程度上可以为理解印度尼西亚当代生育、婚姻和家庭变化模式提供一个主要框架。在1998年改革之后的社会政治变革的背景下,我们发现新兴的人口特征通常与生育过渡后期的社会相关。其中包括一些地区生育率低于更替水平;初婚年龄、未婚年龄和离婚率不断上升;家庭/家庭形式日益多样化。由于印度尼西亚的广大地区在经济、文化和人口上都是异质的,SDT的这些关键特征不太可能以统一的方式出现和发展。此外,这些人口变化是在与婚姻和家庭有关的观念变化的性质和方向的多重紧张和矛盾中发生的。我们认为,在印度尼西亚,推动婚姻、生育和家庭转变的主流观念变化既不是线性的,也不是单一的。体现个人主义、世俗主义和后物质主义的新兴观念变化——最初在SDT理论中被提出,是后工业西欧生育率下降的主要驱动因素——可以与促进非世俗化和加强家庭制度的流行价值观重叠。作为一个人口统计学框架,SDT理论是一个重要而有用的起点。但是,考虑到生育率转变背后复杂的社会政治和日益不稳定的经济环境,以及改革后印度尼西亚的婚姻和家庭变化,需要对其进行重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信