Sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the high-risk secondary headache detection.

David García-Azorín, Jaime Abelaira-Freire, Nuria González-García, Esther Rodriguez-Adrada, Henrik Winther Schytz, Mads Barloese, Ángel Luis Guerrero, Jesús Porta-Etessam, Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez
{"title":"Sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the high-risk secondary headache detection.","authors":"David García-Azorín,&nbsp;Jaime Abelaira-Freire,&nbsp;Nuria González-García,&nbsp;Esther Rodriguez-Adrada,&nbsp;Henrik Winther Schytz,&nbsp;Mads Barloese,&nbsp;Ángel Luis Guerrero,&nbsp;Jesús Porta-Etessam,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez","doi":"10.1177/03331024221120249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients that visited the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) emergency department due to headache that were allocated to a Manchester Triage System level between critical and urgent were prospectively included but retrospectively analysed. A researcher blind to the patients' diagnosis administered a standardised questionnaire and afterwards a neurologist blind to the questionnaire results diagnosed the patient according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The primary endpoint was to assess the sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve of each SNNOOP10 item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2015 and October 2021, 100 patients were included. Patients were 44 years old (inter-quartile range: 33.6-64.7) and 57% were female. We identified 37 different diagnoses. Final diagnosis was a primary headache in 33%, secondary headache in 65% and cranial neuralgia in 2%. There were 46 patients that were considered as having high-risk headache. Patients from the primary headache group were younger and more frequently female. Sensitivity of SNNOOP10 list was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.2%-100%). The items with higher sensitivity were neurologic deficit or disfunction (75.5%), pattern change or recent onset of the headache (64.4%), onset after 50 years (64.4%). The most specific items were posttraumatic onset of headache (94.5%), neoplasm in history (89.1%) and systemic symptoms (89%). The area under the curve of the SNNOOP10 list was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The red flags from the SNNOOP10 list showed a 100% sensitivity in the detection of high-risk headache disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":" ","pages":"1521-1531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221120249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches.

Methods: Patients that visited the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) emergency department due to headache that were allocated to a Manchester Triage System level between critical and urgent were prospectively included but retrospectively analysed. A researcher blind to the patients' diagnosis administered a standardised questionnaire and afterwards a neurologist blind to the questionnaire results diagnosed the patient according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The primary endpoint was to assess the sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve of each SNNOOP10 item.

Results: Between April 2015 and October 2021, 100 patients were included. Patients were 44 years old (inter-quartile range: 33.6-64.7) and 57% were female. We identified 37 different diagnoses. Final diagnosis was a primary headache in 33%, secondary headache in 65% and cranial neuralgia in 2%. There were 46 patients that were considered as having high-risk headache. Patients from the primary headache group were younger and more frequently female. Sensitivity of SNNOOP10 list was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.2%-100%). The items with higher sensitivity were neurologic deficit or disfunction (75.5%), pattern change or recent onset of the headache (64.4%), onset after 50 years (64.4%). The most specific items were posttraumatic onset of headache (94.5%), neoplasm in history (89.1%) and systemic symptoms (89%). The area under the curve of the SNNOOP10 list was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.76).

Conclusion: The red flags from the SNNOOP10 list showed a 100% sensitivity in the detection of high-risk headache disorders.

SNNOOP10表在高危继发性头痛检测中的敏感性。
目的:评价SNNOOP10表对高危头痛的诊断准确性。方法:前瞻性纳入到Clínico圣卡洛斯(马德里)医院急诊科就诊的头痛患者,这些患者被分配到曼彻斯特分诊系统级别,在危急和紧急之间,并进行回顾性分析。一名不知道患者诊断的研究人员对患者进行标准化问卷调查,然后一名不知道问卷结果的神经科医生根据国际头痛疾病分类对患者进行诊断。主要终点是评估SNNOOP10列表在检测高危头痛中的敏感性。次要终点包括评价SNNOOP10各项目的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积。结果:2015年4月至2021年10月,纳入100例患者。患者年龄44岁(四分位数间距:33.6-64.7),57%为女性。我们确定了37种不同的诊断。最终诊断为33%为原发性头痛,65%为继发性头痛,2%为颅神经痛。有46例患者被认为有高危头痛。原发性头痛组患者多为年轻女性。SNNOOP10表的灵敏度为100%(95%置信区间:90.2% ~ 100%)。敏感度较高的项目为神经功能缺损或功能障碍(75.5%)、头痛模式改变或最近发病(64.4%)、50年后发病(64.4%)。最具体的项目是创伤后头痛(94.5%)、既往肿瘤(89.1%)和全身症状(89%)。SNNOOP10表曲线下面积为0.66 (95% CI: 0.55 ~ 0.76)。结论:SNNOOP10列表中的危险信号在检测高危头痛疾病方面具有100%的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信