Provider Perceptions of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Barriers to Implementation in a Level III Neonatal Unit in South India.

Mihir R Atreya, John M Lorenz, Vivek Narendran
{"title":"Provider Perceptions of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Barriers to Implementation in a Level III Neonatal Unit in South India.","authors":"Mihir R Atreya,&nbsp;John M Lorenz,&nbsp;Vivek Narendran","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a simple, safe, and cost-effective strategy to provide respiratory support to newborns with respiratory distress syndrome in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand whether implementation of bCPAP, relative to other modes of respiratory support in the care of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome, increases positive attitudes about its potential for consistent and widespread use among providers in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of lower middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews with 14 healthcare providers, including 5 neonatal nurses, 2 respiratory therapists, 5 postgraduate trainees in pediatrics, and 2 attending physicians, were conducted at a level III NICU in south India where bCPAP had been in consistent use for 6 years. Interviews were transcribed and then coded and categorized using NVivo 10 Software (QSR International, Victoria, Australia).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Categories that emerged from our data include (1) perceived indications, (2) learning curve, (3) perceived costs, (4) perceived shortages, and (5) barriers to use. Providers believed that bCPAP was easy to learn and that it helped empower neonatal nurses in decision-making process. Participants provided a nuanced perspective of cost-benefit associated with bCPAP and that it helped make optimal use of limited resources. Participants identified several barriers to the implementation of bCPAP.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Providers of a level III NICU in a lower- to middle-income country viewed the use of bCPAP favorably. Addressing context-specific barriers will be important for the successful widespread implementation of bCPAP.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>Further research will need to focus on whether bCPAP can be safely implemented at level II NICUs.Video Abstract Available at https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"500-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000510","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a simple, safe, and cost-effective strategy to provide respiratory support to newborns with respiratory distress syndrome in resource-limited settings.

Purpose: To understand whether implementation of bCPAP, relative to other modes of respiratory support in the care of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome, increases positive attitudes about its potential for consistent and widespread use among providers in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of lower middle-income countries.

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews with 14 healthcare providers, including 5 neonatal nurses, 2 respiratory therapists, 5 postgraduate trainees in pediatrics, and 2 attending physicians, were conducted at a level III NICU in south India where bCPAP had been in consistent use for 6 years. Interviews were transcribed and then coded and categorized using NVivo 10 Software (QSR International, Victoria, Australia).

Findings: Categories that emerged from our data include (1) perceived indications, (2) learning curve, (3) perceived costs, (4) perceived shortages, and (5) barriers to use. Providers believed that bCPAP was easy to learn and that it helped empower neonatal nurses in decision-making process. Participants provided a nuanced perspective of cost-benefit associated with bCPAP and that it helped make optimal use of limited resources. Participants identified several barriers to the implementation of bCPAP.

Implications for practice: Providers of a level III NICU in a lower- to middle-income country viewed the use of bCPAP favorably. Addressing context-specific barriers will be important for the successful widespread implementation of bCPAP.

Implications for research: Further research will need to focus on whether bCPAP can be safely implemented at level II NICUs.Video Abstract Available at https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx.

提供者对气泡持续气道正压通气的认知和在印度南部三级新生儿病房实施的障碍。
背景:在资源有限的环境下,气泡持续气道正压通气(bCPAP)是一种简单、安全、具有成本效益的策略,可为患有呼吸窘迫综合征的新生儿提供呼吸支持。目的:了解bCPAP的实施,相对于其他呼吸支持模式在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的护理中,是否增加了对其在中低收入国家新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)中持续和广泛使用的潜力的积极态度。方法:在印度南部一所III级新生儿重症监护室对14名医疗服务提供者进行半结构化定性访谈,其中包括5名新生儿护士、2名呼吸治疗师、5名儿科研究生实习生和2名主治医生,该医院已连续使用bCPAP 6年。访谈被转录,然后使用NVivo 10软件(QSR International, Victoria, Australia)进行编码和分类。研究结果:从我们的数据中出现的类别包括(1)感知适应症,(2)学习曲线,(3)感知成本,(4)感知短缺,(5)使用障碍。提供者认为bCPAP易于学习,并有助于赋予新生儿护士决策过程的权力。与会者提供了与bCPAP相关的成本效益的细致入微的观点,并认为bCPAP有助于优化有限资源的利用。与会者确定了实施bCPAP的几个障碍。实践意义:中低收入国家III级新生儿重症监护室的提供者对bCPAP的使用持积极态度。解决具体情况的障碍对于成功广泛实施bCPAP非常重要。研究意义:进一步的研究需要关注bCPAP是否可以安全地应用于II级新生儿重症监护病房。视频摘要可在https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信