Development of nursing students' attitudes scale toward pain assessment.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hülya Bulut, Sevil Güler, İnci Mercan Annak, Çiğdem Berk Özcan
{"title":"Development of nursing students' attitudes scale toward pain assessment.","authors":"Hülya Bulut,&nbsp;Sevil Güler,&nbsp;İnci Mercan Annak,&nbsp;Çiğdem Berk Özcan","doi":"10.14744/agri.2022.90018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to the development of nursing students' attitudes scale toward pain assessment and establish its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a methodological study conducted in the 2017-2018 academic year. The sample consisted of 300 nursing students attending at the Department of Nursing of Gazi and Selçuk Universities. First, a 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews with 25 students. Five experts were consulted for content validity. The items were revised, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The 45-item final version was applied to participants. Afterward, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to determine the scale structure. Test-retest reliability was determined on 190 participants selected randomly from the sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews. Five experts were consulted for content validity, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The rotated principal component analysis revealed 15 items loaded on two factors. The total scale had internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; α) of 0.918 and test-retest reliability of 0.738.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Factor analyses showed that the scale had satisfactory construct validity and a two-factor structure. All α values were higher than 0.70, indicating that the scale had a satisfactory level of reliability. All in all, it is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure nursing students' attitudes toward pain assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45603,"journal":{"name":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"34 4","pages":"245-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2022.90018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to the development of nursing students' attitudes scale toward pain assessment and establish its validity and reliability.

Methods: This was a methodological study conducted in the 2017-2018 academic year. The sample consisted of 300 nursing students attending at the Department of Nursing of Gazi and Selçuk Universities. First, a 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews with 25 students. Five experts were consulted for content validity. The items were revised, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The 45-item final version was applied to participants. Afterward, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to determine the scale structure. Test-retest reliability was determined on 190 participants selected randomly from the sample.

Results: A 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews. Five experts were consulted for content validity, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The rotated principal component analysis revealed 15 items loaded on two factors. The total scale had internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; α) of 0.918 and test-retest reliability of 0.738.

Conclusion: Factor analyses showed that the scale had satisfactory construct validity and a two-factor structure. All α values were higher than 0.70, indicating that the scale had a satisfactory level of reliability. All in all, it is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure nursing students' attitudes toward pain assessment.

护生疼痛评估态度量表的编制。
目的:编制护生疼痛评估态度量表,并对其效度和信度进行验证。方法:在2017-2018学年进行方法学研究。样本包括300名在Gazi和sel uk大学护理系就读的护理专业学生。首先,根据文献综述和对25名学生的采访,制定了一份51项的草案。内容效度咨询了5位专家。修改了项目,根据他们的反馈删除了6个项目。45项的最终版本应用于参与者。然后,进行探索性和验证性因素分析以确定量表结构。对从样本中随机抽取的190名参与者进行重测信度测定。结果:在文献回顾和访谈的基础上,制定了51项草案。对5位专家进行了内容效度咨询,并根据他们的反馈删除了6个项目。旋转主成分分析显示15个项目加载在两个因素上。总量表具有内部一致性信度(Cronbach’s alpha;α)为0.918,重测信度为0.738。结论:因子分析表明该量表具有良好的构念效度和双因子结构。所有α值均大于0.70,表明量表具有令人满意的信度。总而言之,该量表有效可靠,可用于衡量护生对疼痛评估的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信