Comparison of four low-level carbon monoxide alarms suitable for home use or when traveling.

IF 0.7
Neil B Hampson, James R Holm
{"title":"Comparison of four low-level carbon monoxide alarms suitable for home use or when traveling.","authors":"Neil B Hampson,&nbsp;James R Holm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interest in carbon monoxide (CO) alarms that are more sensitive than is required for standard residential CO alarms is growing, as reflected by increased marketing of \"low-level\" alarms capable of measuring CO levels as low as 10 PPM. At the same time, publicity surrounding CO poisoning events among travelers in lodging facilities has stimulated interest in travel CO alarms. We sought to evaluate four low-level alarms that could be used in the home and especially when traveling.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Two each of four brands of low-level alarms (CO Experts, Forensics, Kidde, and Sensorcon) were acquired by retail purchase and tested. The eight alarms were simultaneously exposed in an environment with a slowly increasing level of CO from indoor burning of charcoal briquets. CO levels displayed on the alarms were recorded once per minute. Activation of preset alerts on the alarms were noted. Finally, alarms were compared for ease of use and features available..</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All brands of alarms measured CO similarly over the range from 10-120 PPM. All alarms performed as claimed by their manufacturers, both regarding range of CO reported and preset alert activation. Each alerted at CO levels below that required by the Underwriters Laboratories 2034 Standard.</p><p><strong>Summary/conclusion: </strong>Since all low-level CO alarms tested measured CO similarly, consumers seeking a low-level CO alarm for use while traveling should base their decision on features desired and price. There are definite differences between the alarms tested, in terms of features, expected durability, ease of operation and price.</p>","PeriodicalId":520823,"journal":{"name":"Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc","volume":" ","pages":"307-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interest in carbon monoxide (CO) alarms that are more sensitive than is required for standard residential CO alarms is growing, as reflected by increased marketing of "low-level" alarms capable of measuring CO levels as low as 10 PPM. At the same time, publicity surrounding CO poisoning events among travelers in lodging facilities has stimulated interest in travel CO alarms. We sought to evaluate four low-level alarms that could be used in the home and especially when traveling.

Materials/methods: Two each of four brands of low-level alarms (CO Experts, Forensics, Kidde, and Sensorcon) were acquired by retail purchase and tested. The eight alarms were simultaneously exposed in an environment with a slowly increasing level of CO from indoor burning of charcoal briquets. CO levels displayed on the alarms were recorded once per minute. Activation of preset alerts on the alarms were noted. Finally, alarms were compared for ease of use and features available..

Results: All brands of alarms measured CO similarly over the range from 10-120 PPM. All alarms performed as claimed by their manufacturers, both regarding range of CO reported and preset alert activation. Each alerted at CO levels below that required by the Underwriters Laboratories 2034 Standard.

Summary/conclusion: Since all low-level CO alarms tested measured CO similarly, consumers seeking a low-level CO alarm for use while traveling should base their decision on features desired and price. There are definite differences between the alarms tested, in terms of features, expected durability, ease of operation and price.

四种适合家庭使用或旅行时使用的低水平一氧化碳报警器的比较。
引言:人们对比标准住宅CO报警器更敏感的一氧化碳(CO)报警器的兴趣正在增长,这反映在能够测量低至10 PPM的CO水平的“低水平”报警器的营销增加上。与此同时,关于住宿设施中旅行者一氧化碳中毒事件的宣传也激发了人们对旅行一氧化碳报警器的兴趣。我们试图评估四种可以在家中使用的低水平警报,尤其是在旅行时。材料/方法:通过零售购买四种低级别报警器(CO Experts, Forensics, Kidde和Sensorcon)各两种并进行测试。8个警报器同时暴露在室内燃烧炭块产生的CO水平缓慢上升的环境中。报警器上显示的一氧化碳浓度每分钟记录一次。警报上的预设警报激活被记录下来。最后,对警报的易用性和可用功能进行了比较。结果:所有品牌的警报在10-120 PPM的范围内测量CO相似。所有警报都按照制造商的要求执行,包括报告的CO范围和预设警报激活。它们的CO浓度都低于保险商实验室2034年标准的要求。总结/结论:由于所有测试过的低一氧化碳报警器测量的一氧化碳含量都是相似的,因此在旅行中寻找低一氧化碳报警器的消费者应该根据所需的功能和价格做出决定。所测试的警报器在功能、预期的耐用性、操作的便利性和价格方面存在明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书