Hyperbaric oxygen for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxia prior to vaccine availability.

IF 0.7
Deepa Jansen, Daniel R Dickstein, Kasandra Erazo, Ellen Stacom, David C Lee, Sandra K Wainwright
{"title":"Hyperbaric oxygen for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxia prior to vaccine availability.","authors":"Deepa Jansen,&nbsp;Daniel R Dickstein,&nbsp;Kasandra Erazo,&nbsp;Ellen Stacom,&nbsp;David C Lee,&nbsp;Sandra K Wainwright","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few treatments have demonstrated mortality benefits among hospitalized hypoxic COVID-19 patients. We evaluated the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy as a therapeutic intervention among hospitalized patients with a high oxygen requirement prior to vaccine approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data on patients with COVID-19 hypoxia who required oxygen supplementation ranging from a 6L nasal cannula up to a high-flow nasal cannula at 100% FiO2 at 60L/minute with a 100% non-rebreather mask at 15 L/minute and were eligible for off-label HBO2 therapy from October 2020 to February 2021. We followed the Monitored Emergency use of Unregistered and Investigational Interventions or (MEURI) in conjunction with the consistent re-evaluation of the protocol using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) tool [1]. We compared patient characteristics and used Fisher's exact test and a survival analysis to assess the primary endpoint of inpatient death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HBO2 therapy was offered to 36 patients, of which 24 received treatment and 12 did not receive treatment. Patients who did not receive treatment were significantly older (p ≺ 0.01) and had worse baseline hypoxia (p = 0.06). Three of the 24 (13%) patients who received treatment died compared to six of 12 (50%) patients who did not receive treatment (RR ratio: 0.25, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.83). In the survival analysis, there was a statistically significant reduction in inpatient mortality in the treatment group (HR: 0.19, p = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.05-0.74). However, after adjusting for age and baseline hypoxia, there was no difference in inpatient mortality (hazard ratio: 0.48, p = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.08-2.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survival benefit of HBO2 therapy observed in our unadjusted analysis suggests that there may be therapeutic benefits of HBO2 in treating COVID-19 hypoxia as an adjunct to standard care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520823,"journal":{"name":"Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc","volume":" ","pages":"295-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Few treatments have demonstrated mortality benefits among hospitalized hypoxic COVID-19 patients. We evaluated the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy as a therapeutic intervention among hospitalized patients with a high oxygen requirement prior to vaccine approval.

Methods: We extracted data on patients with COVID-19 hypoxia who required oxygen supplementation ranging from a 6L nasal cannula up to a high-flow nasal cannula at 100% FiO2 at 60L/minute with a 100% non-rebreather mask at 15 L/minute and were eligible for off-label HBO2 therapy from October 2020 to February 2021. We followed the Monitored Emergency use of Unregistered and Investigational Interventions or (MEURI) in conjunction with the consistent re-evaluation of the protocol using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) tool [1]. We compared patient characteristics and used Fisher's exact test and a survival analysis to assess the primary endpoint of inpatient death.

Results: HBO2 therapy was offered to 36 patients, of which 24 received treatment and 12 did not receive treatment. Patients who did not receive treatment were significantly older (p ≺ 0.01) and had worse baseline hypoxia (p = 0.06). Three of the 24 (13%) patients who received treatment died compared to six of 12 (50%) patients who did not receive treatment (RR ratio: 0.25, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.83). In the survival analysis, there was a statistically significant reduction in inpatient mortality in the treatment group (HR: 0.19, p = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.05-0.74). However, after adjusting for age and baseline hypoxia, there was no difference in inpatient mortality (hazard ratio: 0.48, p = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.08-2.86).

Conclusion: The survival benefit of HBO2 therapy observed in our unadjusted analysis suggests that there may be therapeutic benefits of HBO2 in treating COVID-19 hypoxia as an adjunct to standard care.

在疫苗可用前对COVID-19严重缺氧患者进行高压氧治疗。
在住院缺氧的COVID-19患者中,很少有治疗方法显示出死亡率的降低。我们评估了在疫苗批准前使用高压氧(HBO2)治疗作为高氧需要量住院患者的治疗干预措施。方法:我们提取了COVID-19缺氧患者的数据,这些患者需要补充氧气,从6L鼻插管到高流量鼻插管,100% FiO2, 60L/分钟,100%无呼吸面罩,15l /分钟,符合2020年10月至2021年2月的超说明书HBO2治疗条件。我们跟踪了未注册和研究性干预措施(MEURI)的监测紧急使用情况,并使用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)工具对方案进行了一致的重新评估[1]。我们比较了患者的特征,并使用Fisher精确检验和生存分析来评估住院患者死亡的主要终点。结果:36例患者接受HBO2治疗,其中24例接受治疗,12例未接受治疗。未接受治疗的患者年龄明显增大(p{0.01}),基线缺氧情况较差(p = 0.06)。24例接受治疗的患者中有3例(13%)死亡,而12例未接受治疗的患者中有6例(50%)死亡(RR比:0.25,p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.08至0.83)。在生存分析中,治疗组住院死亡率有统计学意义的降低(HR: 0.19, p = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.05-0.74)。然而,在调整年龄和基线缺氧后,住院死亡率没有差异(风险比:0.48,p = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.08-2.86)。结论:在我们的未经调整的分析中观察到HBO2治疗的生存获益,这表明HBO2作为标准治疗的辅助治疗COVID-19缺氧可能有治疗益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书