Users' Modifications to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Content Analysis of YouTube Video Comments.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-12 DOI:10.2196/38268
Yachao Li, David L Ashley, Lucy Popova
{"title":"Users' Modifications to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Content Analysis of YouTube Video Comments.","authors":"Yachao Li,&nbsp;David L Ashley,&nbsp;Lucy Popova","doi":"10.2196/38268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>User modifications can alter the toxicity and addictiveness of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs). YouTube has been a major platform where ENDS users obtain and share information about ENDS modifications. Past research has examined the content and characteristics of ENDS modification videos.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the video comments to understand the viewers' reactions to these videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 168 YouTube videos depicting ENDS modifications. Each video's top 20 most liked comments were retrieved. The final sample included 2859 comments. A content analysis identified major themes of the comment content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most comments were directed to creators and interacted with others: 952/2859 (33.30%) expressed appreciation, 135/2859 (4.72%) requested more videos, 462/2859 (16.16%) asked for clarification, and 67/2859 (2.34%) inquired about product purchases. In addition, comments mentioned viewers' experiences of ENDS modifications (430/2859, 15.04%) and tobacco use (167/2859, 5.84%); about 198/2859 (6.93%) also indicated intentions to modify ENDSs and 34/2859 (1.19%) mentioned that they were \"newbies.\" Moreover, comments included modification knowledge: 346/2859 (12.10%) provided additional information, 227/2859 (7.94%) mentioned newly learned knowledge, and 162/2859 (5.67%) criticized the videos. Furthermore, few comments mentioned the dangers of ENDS modifications (136/2859, 4.76%) and tobacco use (7/2859, 0.24%). Lastly, among the 15 comments explicitly mentioning regulations, 13/2859 (0.45%) were against and 2/2859 (0.07%) were supportive of regulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated acceptance and popularity of ENDS modifications and suggested that the videos might motivate current and new users to alter their devices. Few comments mentioned the risks and regulations. Regulatory research and agencies should be aware of online ENDS modification information and understand its impacts on users.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: User modifications can alter the toxicity and addictiveness of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs). YouTube has been a major platform where ENDS users obtain and share information about ENDS modifications. Past research has examined the content and characteristics of ENDS modification videos.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the video comments to understand the viewers' reactions to these videos.

Methods: We identified 168 YouTube videos depicting ENDS modifications. Each video's top 20 most liked comments were retrieved. The final sample included 2859 comments. A content analysis identified major themes of the comment content.

Results: Most comments were directed to creators and interacted with others: 952/2859 (33.30%) expressed appreciation, 135/2859 (4.72%) requested more videos, 462/2859 (16.16%) asked for clarification, and 67/2859 (2.34%) inquired about product purchases. In addition, comments mentioned viewers' experiences of ENDS modifications (430/2859, 15.04%) and tobacco use (167/2859, 5.84%); about 198/2859 (6.93%) also indicated intentions to modify ENDSs and 34/2859 (1.19%) mentioned that they were "newbies." Moreover, comments included modification knowledge: 346/2859 (12.10%) provided additional information, 227/2859 (7.94%) mentioned newly learned knowledge, and 162/2859 (5.67%) criticized the videos. Furthermore, few comments mentioned the dangers of ENDS modifications (136/2859, 4.76%) and tobacco use (7/2859, 0.24%). Lastly, among the 15 comments explicitly mentioning regulations, 13/2859 (0.45%) were against and 2/2859 (0.07%) were supportive of regulations.

Conclusions: The results indicated acceptance and popularity of ENDS modifications and suggested that the videos might motivate current and new users to alter their devices. Few comments mentioned the risks and regulations. Regulatory research and agencies should be aware of online ENDS modification information and understand its impacts on users.

用户对电子尼古丁输送系统的修改:YouTube视频评论的内容分析
背景:使用者的改变可以改变电子尼古丁传递系统的毒性和成瘾性。YouTube一直是终端用户获取和分享终端修改信息的主要平台。过去的研究已经考察了ENDS修改视频的内容和特征。目的:本研究旨在分析视频评论,了解观众对这些视频的反应。方法:我们选取了168个描述ENDS修改的YouTube视频。每个视频的前20个最喜欢的评论被检索出来。最后的样本包含2859条评论。内容分析确定了评论内容的主要主题。结果:大多数评论指向创作者并与他人互动:952/2859(33.30%)表示赞赏,135/2859(4.72%)要求更多视频,462/2859(16.16%)要求澄清,67/2859(2.34%)询问产品购买。此外,评论提到了观众对ENDS修改(430/2859,15.04%)和烟草使用(167/2859,5.84%)的体验;约198/2859(6.93%)也表示有意修改终端数据服务,34/2859(1.19%)表示他们是“新手”。此外,评论中还包括修改知识,其中346/2859(12.10%)评论了补充信息,227/2859(7.94%)评论了新学知识,162/2859(5.67%)评论了视频。此外,很少有评论提到ENDS修改(136/2859,4.76%)和烟草使用(7/2859,0.24%)的危险。最后,在15条明确提到监管的评论中,13/2859(0.45%)反对监管,2/2859(0.07%)支持监管。结论:研究结果表明了ENDS修改的接受度和受欢迎程度,并表明视频可能会激励现有和新用户改变他们的设备。很少有人评论提到风险和监管。监管研究和机构应该了解在线ENDS修改信息,并了解其对用户的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信