Checklists and cognitive aids: underutilized and under-researched tools to promote patient safety and optimize clinician performance.

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001193
Rodrigo J Daly Guris, Meghan B Lane-Fall
{"title":"Checklists and cognitive aids: underutilized and under-researched tools to promote patient safety and optimize clinician performance.","authors":"Rodrigo J Daly Guris,&nbsp;Meghan B Lane-Fall","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Checklists and other cognitive aids serve multiple purposes in the peri-operative setting and have become nearly ubiquitous in healthcare. This review lays out the evidence for their use, shortcomings and pitfalls to be aware of, and how technology and innovation may improve checklist and cognitive aid relevance and usability.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>It has been difficult to show a direct link between the use of checklists alone and patient outcomes, but simulation studies have repeatedly demonstrated an association between checklist or cognitive aid use and improved performance. When implemented as part of a bundle of interventions, checklists likely have a positive impact, but the benefit of checklists and other cognitive aids may be both context- and user dependent. Advances in technology and automation demonstrate promise, but usability, design, and implementation research in this area are necessary to maximize effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Cognitive aids like checklists are powerful tools in the perioperative and critical care setting. Further research and innovation may elevate what is possible by improving the usability and relevance of these tools, possibly translating into improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"723-727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose of review: Checklists and other cognitive aids serve multiple purposes in the peri-operative setting and have become nearly ubiquitous in healthcare. This review lays out the evidence for their use, shortcomings and pitfalls to be aware of, and how technology and innovation may improve checklist and cognitive aid relevance and usability.

Recent findings: It has been difficult to show a direct link between the use of checklists alone and patient outcomes, but simulation studies have repeatedly demonstrated an association between checklist or cognitive aid use and improved performance. When implemented as part of a bundle of interventions, checklists likely have a positive impact, but the benefit of checklists and other cognitive aids may be both context- and user dependent. Advances in technology and automation demonstrate promise, but usability, design, and implementation research in this area are necessary to maximize effectiveness.

Summary: Cognitive aids like checklists are powerful tools in the perioperative and critical care setting. Further research and innovation may elevate what is possible by improving the usability and relevance of these tools, possibly translating into improved patient outcomes.

检查清单和认知辅助工具:促进患者安全和优化临床医生表现的未充分利用和研究的工具。
综述目的:检查表和其他认知辅助工具在围手术期有多种用途,在医疗保健中几乎无处不在。这篇综述列出了它们使用的证据,需要注意的缺点和陷阱,以及技术和创新如何改善检查表和认知辅助的相关性和可用性。最近的发现:很难证明单独使用检查表与患者预后之间存在直接联系,但模拟研究一再证明使用检查表或认知辅助与改善表现之间存在关联。当作为一系列干预措施的一部分实施时,检查清单可能会产生积极的影响,但检查清单和其他认知辅助工具的好处可能取决于上下文和用户。技术和自动化的进步展示了希望,但是该领域的可用性、设计和实现研究对于最大化有效性是必要的。总结:像检查表这样的认知辅助工具在围手术期和重症监护环境中是强有力的工具。进一步的研究和创新可能会通过提高这些工具的可用性和相关性来提升可能性,可能会转化为改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信