Improved participation for blood lead screening with in-home phlebotomy.

Kathryn C Dowling, Veronica Miranda, Vanessa E Galaviz
{"title":"Improved participation for blood lead screening with in-home phlebotomy.","authors":"Kathryn C Dowling,&nbsp;Veronica Miranda,&nbsp;Vanessa E Galaviz","doi":"10.1007/s10935-008-0144-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both nationally and within the State of California, it is unlikely that those children most susceptible to lead exposure are adequately screened for blood lead levels. New and creative approaches are necessary to reach these individuals. In-home phlebotomy was employed to test blood lead levels of 128 San Diego households containing Latino children aged 12-71 months. As part of a lead exposure study, these households were randomly selected from 12 census tracts in the downtown area during February-July, 2006. By employing a bicultural/bilingual phlebotomist, the participation rate for in-home phlebotomy was 89% among enrolled study participants. This rate is substantially higher than estimates for customary testing of similar underserved groups through physicians, has the advantage of reaching individuals without medical insurance, and contrasts favorably ($45 per individual test) with typical office visit costs. Culturally appropriate in-home phlebotomy may be a useful method for medical screening to meet the needs of underserved communities. Editors' Strategic Implications: The authors provide an excellent example of the importance of bringing prevention services to clients, literally in terms of the home visitation format but also with respect to the comfort level that may come from interacting with a bicultural and bilingual professional.</p>","PeriodicalId":231565,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"323-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10935-008-0144-x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-008-0144-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Both nationally and within the State of California, it is unlikely that those children most susceptible to lead exposure are adequately screened for blood lead levels. New and creative approaches are necessary to reach these individuals. In-home phlebotomy was employed to test blood lead levels of 128 San Diego households containing Latino children aged 12-71 months. As part of a lead exposure study, these households were randomly selected from 12 census tracts in the downtown area during February-July, 2006. By employing a bicultural/bilingual phlebotomist, the participation rate for in-home phlebotomy was 89% among enrolled study participants. This rate is substantially higher than estimates for customary testing of similar underserved groups through physicians, has the advantage of reaching individuals without medical insurance, and contrasts favorably ($45 per individual test) with typical office visit costs. Culturally appropriate in-home phlebotomy may be a useful method for medical screening to meet the needs of underserved communities. Editors' Strategic Implications: The authors provide an excellent example of the importance of bringing prevention services to clients, literally in terms of the home visitation format but also with respect to the comfort level that may come from interacting with a bicultural and bilingual professional.

通过家庭静脉切开术提高血铅筛查的参与率。
无论是在全国范围内还是在加利福尼亚州,对那些最容易接触铅的儿童进行充分的血铅水平筛查是不太可能的。需要新的和创造性的方法来接触这些人。采用家庭静脉切开术检测圣地亚哥128个家庭中12-71个月的拉丁裔儿童的血铅水平。作为铅接触研究的一部分,这些家庭是在2006年2月至7月期间从市中心12个人口普查区随机选择的。通过聘用双文化/双语采血师,在入组的研究参与者中,在家采血的参与率为89%。这一比率大大高于通过医生对类似的服务不足群体进行常规检测的估计,它的优势是可以接触到没有医疗保险的个人,并且与典型的办公室就诊费用(每次检测45美元)形成有利对比。文化上适当的家庭静脉切开术可能是一种有用的医疗筛查方法,以满足服务不足社区的需求。编辑的战略意义:作者提供了一个很好的例子,说明了为客户提供预防服务的重要性,从家访形式的角度来看,但也考虑到与双文化和双语专业人员互动可能带来的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信