Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe-and slightly better!

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff, André H Dias, Peter Iversen, Lars Christian Gormsen, Karin Hjorthaug
{"title":"Early acquisition of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe-and slightly better!","authors":"Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff,&nbsp;André H Dias,&nbsp;Peter Iversen,&nbsp;Lars Christian Gormsen,&nbsp;Karin Hjorthaug","doi":"10.1186/s41824-022-00140-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare early (15 min) and late (60 min) [<sup>18</sup>F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition times in the detection of recurrence/residual disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two dual-phase [<sup>18</sup>F]FDOPA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed. Scan indications were (1) suspected recurrence of MTC, (2) treatment monitoring, or (3) restaging. In four scans, no final verification could be obtained, and one scan was excluded due to non-consistency with the acquisition protocol. Images were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively (using SUV<sub>max</sub>). On both per-scan and per-lesion basis, early (median time 15 min) and late (median time 60 min) acquisition were compared by number and SUV<sub>max</sub> of detected MTC lesions, and a washout rate between the two acquisitions was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of early and late acquisition were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 27 eligible PET scans, twenty were classified as PET positive and 7 as PET negative. By subsequent histology and/or combination of imaging and clinical data during follow-up, the MTC diagnosis was verified, showing a scan-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 87.5%, respectively, for the early acquisition, and for the late acquisition both were 100%. However, there were no statistically significant difference in detection rate between the two acquisitions. Lesions on the early acquisition were significantly more intense compared to lesions on the late acquisition (median washout rate of - 33% (- 57 to + 50%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms that it is safe to omit the late [<sup>18</sup>F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition in the detection of recurrent/residual MTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402850/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00140-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare early (15 min) and late (60 min) [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition times in the detection of recurrence/residual disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two dual-phase [18F]FDOPA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed. Scan indications were (1) suspected recurrence of MTC, (2) treatment monitoring, or (3) restaging. In four scans, no final verification could be obtained, and one scan was excluded due to non-consistency with the acquisition protocol. Images were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively (using SUVmax). On both per-scan and per-lesion basis, early (median time 15 min) and late (median time 60 min) acquisition were compared by number and SUVmax of detected MTC lesions, and a washout rate between the two acquisitions was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of early and late acquisition were also compared.

Results: Out of the 27 eligible PET scans, twenty were classified as PET positive and 7 as PET negative. By subsequent histology and/or combination of imaging and clinical data during follow-up, the MTC diagnosis was verified, showing a scan-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 87.5%, respectively, for the early acquisition, and for the late acquisition both were 100%. However, there were no statistically significant difference in detection rate between the two acquisitions. Lesions on the early acquisition were significantly more intense compared to lesions on the late acquisition (median washout rate of - 33% (- 57 to + 50%)).

Conclusion: Our study confirms that it is safe to omit the late [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition in the detection of recurrent/residual MTC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

早期获得[18F]FDOPA PET/CT成像对复发或残留甲状腺髓样癌患者是安全的,并且略好!
目的:本研究的目的是比较早期(15 min)和晚期(60 min) [18F]FDOPA PET/CT采集时间对甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)患者复发/残留病变的检测。材料与方法:回顾性分析32张双相[18F]FDOPA PET扫描图。扫描指征为(1)怀疑MTC复发,(2)治疗监测,或(3)重新定位。在四次扫描中,没有得到最终的验证,其中一次扫描由于与采集协议不一致而被排除。图像进行视觉和半定量分析(使用SUVmax)。在每次扫描和每个病变的基础上,通过检测到的MTC病变的数量和SUVmax来比较早期(中位时间15分钟)和晚期(中位时间60分钟)的采集,并计算两次采集之间的冲洗率。比较了早期和晚期获得的敏感性和特异性。结果:在27个符合条件的PET扫描中,20个为PET阳性,7个为PET阴性。通过随后的组织学和/或随访期间的影像学和临床资料的结合,证实了MTC的诊断,显示基于扫描的早期获得的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和87.5%,晚期获得的敏感性和特异性均为100%。然而,两次采集的检出率没有统计学上的显著差异。与晚期病变相比,早期病变明显更严重(中位洗脱率为- 33%(- 57%至+ 50%))。结论:我们的研究证实,在检测复发/残留MTC时,省略晚期[18F]FDOPA PET/CT采集是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信