A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad Vaezi, Amirhoushang Pourkhani, Amir Kasaeian, Maryam Souri, Marjan Yaghmaie, Bahram Chardouli, Kamran Alimoghaddam, Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh
{"title":"A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.","authors":"Mohammad Vaezi,&nbsp;Amirhoushang Pourkhani,&nbsp;Amir Kasaeian,&nbsp;Maryam Souri,&nbsp;Marjan Yaghmaie,&nbsp;Bahram Chardouli,&nbsp;Kamran Alimoghaddam,&nbsp;Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh","doi":"10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. <b>Results:</b> Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2<sup>nd</sup> to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). <b>Conclusion:</b> Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD).</p>","PeriodicalId":38991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/df/IJHOSCR-16-22.PMC9339120.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m2, IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. Results: Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2nd to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). Conclusion: Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

地塞米松加长春新碱与标准方案诱导治疗成人急性淋巴细胞白血病行造血干细胞移植的比较。
背景:目前急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的治疗选择包括单独化疗或诱导化疗后的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)以及中枢神经系统预防。目前使用的常规和标准诱导方案可能会产生严重的并发症和死亡率。材料和方法:为了减少接受HSCT的ALL患者诱导方案的并发症,我们对49名新诊断的成年ALL患者使用了细胞减少诱导方案,包括地塞米松(8mg,静脉注射,每天三次,持续28天)和vincristine(1.4 mg/m2,静脉注射,第1、8、15和22天),随后在两个月内进行了早期兄弟姐妹供体HSCT。结果与172例采用标准诱导方案的ALL患者的移植结果相匹配。结果:标准组中位随访时间为5.41年,对照组中位随访时间为5.27年。病例组所有患者(100%)均获得完全缓解。进行里程碑式分析以仔细检查治疗对不同时间间隔的影响:头两年和第2年至最后一年。治疗方式对第一个标志的死亡危险无显著影响(HR=0.87, P=0.64)。细胞减少方案在第二个里程碑上的死亡风险是标准方案的3.43倍(HR=3.43 P=0.035)。多因素分析显示,细胞减少方案使复发风险降低约22%,但无统计学意义(HR=0.78, p值=0.24)。结论:总体而言,尽管诱导治疗实现了完全缓解,但反应深度是ALL患者HSCT长期预后的关键预测因素,并且可能需要使用多种药物来减少肿瘤细胞负荷和最小残留病(MRD)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信