Modern and traditional trance language: a comparison.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1080/00029157.2022.2072703
Sarah Karrasch, Johanna Alisa Jung, Suchithra Varadarajan, Iris-Tatjana Kolassa, Walter Bongartz
{"title":"Modern and traditional trance language: a comparison.","authors":"Sarah Karrasch,&nbsp;Johanna Alisa Jung,&nbsp;Suchithra Varadarajan,&nbsp;Iris-Tatjana Kolassa,&nbsp;Walter Bongartz","doi":"10.1080/00029157.2022.2072703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares the effects of two trance texts using different language patterns, i.e., <i>modern trance language</i> (MTL) characterized by indirect suggestions as well as narrative style and <i>traditional trance language</i> (TTL) found in traditional societies (e.g., Navajo, San, Aranda aborigines, etc.) that uses multiple repetitions along with narrative sequences. The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI) was used to evaluate the effects of both texts regarding cognition, emotion, physical experience, and trance depth. In this randomized controlled online study, 178 participants were assigned either to the MTL group or to the TTL group. The PCI and other tests (e.g. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory) were presented to the participants before and after listening to the hypnosis audio of the respective trance text. There were no significant differences between groups concerning trance depth, emotional, and physical experience. However, on the cognitive-imaginative level it was shown that the TTL group experienced more imaginations (PCI-subdimension \"visual imagery,\" <i>p</i> = .009, <i>d</i> = 0.38) and less cognitive activity (PCI-subdimension \"inner dialogue,\" <i>p</i> = .002, <i>d</i> = 0.40) than the MTL group. The results indicate that TTL increases imagery and decreases cognitive activity to a larger extent than MTL. This further indicates the potential of TTL to facilitate more vivid and intensive trance experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"146-159"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2022.2072703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study compares the effects of two trance texts using different language patterns, i.e., modern trance language (MTL) characterized by indirect suggestions as well as narrative style and traditional trance language (TTL) found in traditional societies (e.g., Navajo, San, Aranda aborigines, etc.) that uses multiple repetitions along with narrative sequences. The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI) was used to evaluate the effects of both texts regarding cognition, emotion, physical experience, and trance depth. In this randomized controlled online study, 178 participants were assigned either to the MTL group or to the TTL group. The PCI and other tests (e.g. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory) were presented to the participants before and after listening to the hypnosis audio of the respective trance text. There were no significant differences between groups concerning trance depth, emotional, and physical experience. However, on the cognitive-imaginative level it was shown that the TTL group experienced more imaginations (PCI-subdimension "visual imagery," p = .009, d = 0.38) and less cognitive activity (PCI-subdimension "inner dialogue," p = .002, d = 0.40) than the MTL group. The results indicate that TTL increases imagery and decreases cognitive activity to a larger extent than MTL. This further indicates the potential of TTL to facilitate more vivid and intensive trance experiences.

现代与传统恍惚语言的比较。
本研究比较了两种使用不同语言模式的恍惚文本的效果,即以间接暗示和叙事风格为特征的现代恍惚语言(MTL)和传统社会(如纳瓦霍、圣、阿兰达原住民等)中使用多重重复和叙事序列的传统恍惚语言(TTL)。使用意识现象学量表(PCI)来评估两种文本对认知、情感、身体体验和恍惚深度的影响。在这项随机对照在线研究中,178名参与者被分配到MTL组或TTL组。在听催眠文本的催眠音频之前和之后,向参与者提供PCI和其他测试(如积极和消极影响量表,状态-特质-焦虑量表)。两组之间在恍惚深度、情绪和身体体验方面没有显著差异。然而,在认知-想象水平上,TTL组比MTL组经历了更多的想象(pci -子维度“视觉意象”,p = 0.009, d = 0.38)和更少的认知活动(pci -子维度“内心对话”,p = 0.002, d = 0.40)。结果表明,与MTL相比,TTL在更大程度上增加了意象,降低了认知活动。这进一步表明TTL在促进更生动、更密集的恍惚体验方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信