Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks.

Kathryn R Dalton, William Altekruse, Peter Campbell, Kathy Ruble, Karen C Carroll, Roland J Thorpe, Jacqueline Agnew, Meghan F Davis
{"title":"Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks.","authors":"Kathryn R Dalton,&nbsp;William Altekruse,&nbsp;Peter Campbell,&nbsp;Kathy Ruble,&nbsp;Karen C Carroll,&nbsp;Roland J Thorpe,&nbsp;Jacqueline Agnew,&nbsp;Meghan F Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animal-assisted intervention (AAI) programs, used widely for patient benefit, have increasingly been used for healthcare workers (HCW) to reduce occupational stress. However, there are barriers to these programs which limit their utilization, for both patients and HCW, specifically infectious disease concerns. The aim of the research project is to identify barriers and facilitators to AAI program use for healthcare worker benefit, and determine knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding infectious disease risk and control policies, in order to understand the contextual parameters of program implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected perceptions of key stakeholders involved with hospital AAI programs (HCW and AAI workers) through semi-structured in-depth interviews. We used framework analysis to guide thematic coding, completed independently by three researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 37 participants in this study. We divided our themes into two topic areas: program use for HCW and perceived infectious disease risk. Use for healthcare workers included perspectives on the benefits for HCW and program barriers and facilitators (specifically collaboration and leadership). Perceived risk included opinions on infection concerns with AAI, thoughts on control measures to reduce this risk, and responsibility for safety during these programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While significant benefits were reported for HCW, they were limited by administrative barriers and hazard concerns. Facilitators to surmount these barriers are best implemented with collaboration across the hospital and appropriate leadership roles to direct safe program implementation. By addressing these barriers through targeted facilitators in the form of evidence-backed guidelines, AAI programs can be used to benefit both patients and HCW.</p>","PeriodicalId":93714,"journal":{"name":"People and animals (West Lafayette, IN)","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235541/pdf/nihms-1805346.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and animals (West Lafayette, IN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Animal-assisted intervention (AAI) programs, used widely for patient benefit, have increasingly been used for healthcare workers (HCW) to reduce occupational stress. However, there are barriers to these programs which limit their utilization, for both patients and HCW, specifically infectious disease concerns. The aim of the research project is to identify barriers and facilitators to AAI program use for healthcare worker benefit, and determine knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding infectious disease risk and control policies, in order to understand the contextual parameters of program implementation.

Methods: We collected perceptions of key stakeholders involved with hospital AAI programs (HCW and AAI workers) through semi-structured in-depth interviews. We used framework analysis to guide thematic coding, completed independently by three researchers.

Results: We interviewed 37 participants in this study. We divided our themes into two topic areas: program use for HCW and perceived infectious disease risk. Use for healthcare workers included perspectives on the benefits for HCW and program barriers and facilitators (specifically collaboration and leadership). Perceived risk included opinions on infection concerns with AAI, thoughts on control measures to reduce this risk, and responsibility for safety during these programs.

Conclusions: While significant benefits were reported for HCW, they were limited by administrative barriers and hazard concerns. Facilitators to surmount these barriers are best implemented with collaboration across the hospital and appropriate leadership roles to direct safe program implementation. By addressing these barriers through targeted facilitators in the form of evidence-backed guidelines, AAI programs can be used to benefit both patients and HCW.

医院动物辅助干预项目中关键工人利益相关者群体对职业利益和感知风险的认知和实践。
背景:动物辅助干预(AAI)计划,广泛用于患者利益,已越来越多地用于卫生保健工作者(HCW)减少职业压力。然而,这些计划存在障碍,限制了它们对患者和HCW的利用,特别是传染病问题。本研究项目的目的是确定AAI项目用于卫生保健工作者利益的障碍和促进因素,并确定有关传染病风险和控制政策的知识、信念和实践,以便了解项目实施的背景参数。方法:我们通过半结构化的深度访谈收集了参与医院AAI项目的关键利益相关者(HCW和AAI工作者)的看法。我们采用框架分析指导主题编码,由三位研究者独立完成。结果:本研究共采访了37名参与者。我们将主题分为两个主题领域:HCW的程序使用和感知传染病风险。对医疗保健工作者的使用包括对HCW的好处和项目障碍和促进因素(特别是协作和领导)的看法。感知风险包括对AAI感染问题的看法,对降低这种风险的控制措施的想法,以及在这些项目中的安全责任。结论:虽然报告了HCW的显著益处,但它们受到行政障碍和危害问题的限制。克服这些障碍的促进者最好通过整个医院的合作和适当的领导角色来指导安全计划的实施。通过有针对性的促进者以循证指南的形式解决这些障碍,AAI项目可用于造福患者和HCW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信