Defining Sepsis Phenotypes-Two Murine Models of Sepsis and Machine Learning.

Allan E Stolarski, Jiyoun Kim, Jacob Nudel, Sophia Gunn, Daniel G Remick
{"title":"Defining Sepsis Phenotypes-Two Murine Models of Sepsis and Machine Learning.","authors":"Allan E Stolarski,&nbsp;Jiyoun Kim,&nbsp;Jacob Nudel,&nbsp;Sophia Gunn,&nbsp;Daniel G Remick","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000001935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The immunobiology defining the clinically apparent differences in response to sepsis remains unclear. We hypothesize that in murine models of sepsis we can identify phenotypes of sepsis using non-invasive physiologic parameters (NIPP) early after infection to distinguish between different inflammatory states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two murine models of sepsis were used: gram-negative pneumonia (PNA) and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). All mice were treated with broad spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. High-risk sepsis responders (pDie) were defined as those predicted to die within 72 h following infection. Low-risk responders (pLive) were expected to survive the initial 72 h of sepsis. Statistical modeling in R was used for statistical analysis and machine learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NIPP obtained at 6 and 24 h after infection of 291 mice (85 PNA and 206 CLP) were used to define the sepsis phenotypes. Lasso regression for variable selection with 10-fold cross-validation was used to define the optimal shrinkage parameters. The variables selected to discriminate between phenotypes included 6-h temperature and 24-h pulse distention, heart rate (HR), and temperature. Applying the model to fit test data (n = 55), area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.93. Subgroup analysis of 120 CLP mice revealed a HR of <620 bpm at 24 h as a univariate predictor of pDie. (AUC of ROC curve = 0.90). Subgroup analysis of PNA exposed mice (n = 121) did not reveal a single predictive variable highlighting the complex physiological alterations in response to sepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In murine models with various etiologies of sepsis, non-invasive vitals assessed just 6 and 24 h after infection can identify different sepsis phenotypes. Stratification by sepsis phenotypes can transform future studies investigating novel therapies for sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":238832,"journal":{"name":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","volume":" ","pages":"268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The immunobiology defining the clinically apparent differences in response to sepsis remains unclear. We hypothesize that in murine models of sepsis we can identify phenotypes of sepsis using non-invasive physiologic parameters (NIPP) early after infection to distinguish between different inflammatory states.

Methods: Two murine models of sepsis were used: gram-negative pneumonia (PNA) and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). All mice were treated with broad spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. High-risk sepsis responders (pDie) were defined as those predicted to die within 72 h following infection. Low-risk responders (pLive) were expected to survive the initial 72 h of sepsis. Statistical modeling in R was used for statistical analysis and machine learning.

Results: NIPP obtained at 6 and 24 h after infection of 291 mice (85 PNA and 206 CLP) were used to define the sepsis phenotypes. Lasso regression for variable selection with 10-fold cross-validation was used to define the optimal shrinkage parameters. The variables selected to discriminate between phenotypes included 6-h temperature and 24-h pulse distention, heart rate (HR), and temperature. Applying the model to fit test data (n = 55), area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.93. Subgroup analysis of 120 CLP mice revealed a HR of <620 bpm at 24 h as a univariate predictor of pDie. (AUC of ROC curve = 0.90). Subgroup analysis of PNA exposed mice (n = 121) did not reveal a single predictive variable highlighting the complex physiological alterations in response to sepsis.

Conclusion: In murine models with various etiologies of sepsis, non-invasive vitals assessed just 6 and 24 h after infection can identify different sepsis phenotypes. Stratification by sepsis phenotypes can transform future studies investigating novel therapies for sepsis.

定义脓毒症表型-脓毒症和机器学习的两种小鼠模型。
免疫生物学对脓毒症反应的临床明显差异的定义尚不清楚。我们假设在小鼠脓毒症模型中,我们可以在感染后早期使用非侵入性生理参数(NIPP)识别脓毒症的表型,以区分不同的炎症状态。方法:采用革兰氏阴性肺炎(PNA)和盲肠结扎穿刺(CLP)两种小鼠脓毒症模型。所有小鼠均给予广谱抗生素治疗和液体复苏。高危脓毒症反应者(pDie)被定义为感染后72小时内预计死亡的患者。低风险应答者(pLive)预计在败血症的最初72小时内存活。使用R中的统计建模进行统计分析和机器学习。结果:291只小鼠(85只PNA, 206只CLP)感染后6和24 h获得NIPP,用于确定脓毒症表型。采用10倍交叉验证的套索回归变量选择确定最佳收缩参数。选择用于区分表型的变量包括6小时温度和24小时脉搏扩张、心率(HR)和温度。应用该模型拟合检验数据(n = 55),受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.93。120只CLP小鼠的亚组分析显示:结论:在各种脓毒症病因的小鼠模型中,感染后仅6和24小时的非侵入性生命体征评估可以识别不同的脓毒症表型。脓毒症表型分层可以改变脓毒症新疗法的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书