A New Baseline: Master of Public Health Education Shifting to Meet Public Health Needs.

Genevive R Meredith, Christina R Welter, Kris Risley, Steven M Seweryn, Susan Altfeld, Elizabeth A Jarpe-Ratner
{"title":"A New Baseline: Master of Public Health Education Shifting to Meet Public Health Needs.","authors":"Genevive R Meredith,&nbsp;Christina R Welter,&nbsp;Kris Risley,&nbsp;Steven M Seweryn,&nbsp;Susan Altfeld,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Jarpe-Ratner","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Schools and programs of public health have been preparing graduates to join the workforce for a century, but significant gaps in numbers and abilities exit. Many have called for a change to the status quo, to transform public health education to create a competent workforce able to address current and emergent needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored if Master of Public Health (MPH) programs have shifted their program design, curriculum, and/or instructional methods (instructional design), and if so, how and why.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A sequential mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>MPH programs accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health, and approved applicants.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Some 43% of accredited MPH programs in the United States (n = 115) responded to the online survey (open November 21, 2019-December 20, 2019), providing a representative sample. Stratified purposeful sampling was used to select 8 MPH programs for follow-up semistructured interviews. Categorical and qualitative data were analyzed for trends, association, and themes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Degree of, types of, and reasons for shifts in MPH program instructional design considered and implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MPH programs in the United States have shifted their approaches and curriculum to meet identified and emergent workforce needs. In the last 5 years, 81% made changes to program design (focal competencies, admissions, graduation criteria), 88% to curriculum (added or removed courses, changed course content), and 65% to pedagogical methods (where and how learning is supported).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite concerns about stagnation, MPH programs have shifted to competency-based education aligned with workforce needs, have adapted approaches to support diversity of future workers, and are focused on bolstering workforce readiness. These changes were made to enhance focus on knowledge acquisition, skills building, and professionalism, factors recognized as critical for success, and facilitate more engaged pedagogical strategies, working with communities for impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"513-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Context: Schools and programs of public health have been preparing graduates to join the workforce for a century, but significant gaps in numbers and abilities exit. Many have called for a change to the status quo, to transform public health education to create a competent workforce able to address current and emergent needs.

Objective: This study explored if Master of Public Health (MPH) programs have shifted their program design, curriculum, and/or instructional methods (instructional design), and if so, how and why.

Design: A sequential mixed-methods study.

Setting: MPH programs accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health, and approved applicants.

Participants: Some 43% of accredited MPH programs in the United States (n = 115) responded to the online survey (open November 21, 2019-December 20, 2019), providing a representative sample. Stratified purposeful sampling was used to select 8 MPH programs for follow-up semistructured interviews. Categorical and qualitative data were analyzed for trends, association, and themes.

Main outcome measures: Degree of, types of, and reasons for shifts in MPH program instructional design considered and implemented.

Results: MPH programs in the United States have shifted their approaches and curriculum to meet identified and emergent workforce needs. In the last 5 years, 81% made changes to program design (focal competencies, admissions, graduation criteria), 88% to curriculum (added or removed courses, changed course content), and 65% to pedagogical methods (where and how learning is supported).

Conclusions: Despite concerns about stagnation, MPH programs have shifted to competency-based education aligned with workforce needs, have adapted approaches to support diversity of future workers, and are focused on bolstering workforce readiness. These changes were made to enhance focus on knowledge acquisition, skills building, and professionalism, factors recognized as critical for success, and facilitate more engaged pedagogical strategies, working with communities for impact.

新的基线:公共卫生教育硕士转向满足公共卫生需求。
背景:一个世纪以来,学校和公共卫生项目一直在为毕业生加入劳动力大军做准备,但在数量和能力方面存在重大差距。许多人呼吁改变现状,改革公共卫生教育,培养一支能够满足当前和紧急需求的合格劳动力队伍。目的:本研究探讨公共卫生硕士(MPH)项目是否改变了他们的项目设计、课程设置和/或教学方法(教学设计),如果是,如何以及为什么。设计:顺序混合方法研究。设置:公共卫生教育委员会认可的公共卫生硕士课程,并批准申请人。参与者:美国约43%的经认证的公共卫生硕士项目(n = 115)回应了在线调查(2019年11月21日至2019年12月20日开放),提供了代表性样本。采用分层有目的抽样的方法,选取8个公共卫生硕士项目进行半结构化随访。对分类和定性数据进行趋势、关联和主题分析。主要结果测量:考虑和实施的公共卫生硕士课程教学设计转变的程度、类型和原因。结果:美国的公共卫生硕士项目已经改变了他们的方法和课程,以满足确定的和紧急的劳动力需求。在过去的5年里,81%的学校改变了课程设计(重点能力、入学、毕业标准),88%的学校改变了课程(增加或删除课程、改变课程内容),65%的学校改变了教学方法(在哪里以及如何支持学习)。结论:尽管对停滞的担忧,公共卫生硕士项目已经转向与劳动力需求相一致的以能力为基础的教育,已经调整了支持未来工人多样性的方法,并专注于提高劳动力准备水平。这些变化是为了加强对知识获取、技能培养和专业精神的关注,这些因素被认为是成功的关键因素,并促进更积极的教学策略,与社区合作产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信