A Theory of Frustration and Its Effect.

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s10991-022-09305-7

Sagi Peari, Zamir R Golestani

引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key legal questions that COVID-19 has raised relates to the status of the traditional contractual doctrine of frustration. The pandemic and the ongoing lockdowns across the globe have made it difficult for many contracts to perform. At the same time, there is a deep doctrinal and conceptual confusion with respect to the very essentials of this doctrine and its remedy - i.e., what happens after an adjudicative tribunal declares that a given contract has been frustrated. The paper offers a unified conceptual account of the frustration doctrine and claims that both the doctrine and its remedy crystallize a single unifying idea.

查看原文本刊更多论文

挫折理论及其影响。

COVID-19引发的关键法律问题之一涉及传统合同挫折原则的地位。疫情和全球范围内持续的封锁使许多合同难以履行。与此同时，在这一学说及其补救办法的本质方面存在着深刻的理论和概念上的混淆- -即，在裁决法庭宣布某一合同无效之后会发生什么。本文对挫折学说提供了一个统一的概念说明，并声称挫折学说及其补救措施都体现了一个统一的理念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Liverpool Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Liverpool Law Review is a tri-annual journal of contemporary domestic, European and international legal and social policy issues. The Journal aims to provide articles, commentaries and reviews across a wide range of theoretical and practical legal and social policy matters - including public law, private law, civil and criminal justice, international law, ethics and legal theory. The Journal has many international subscribers and regularly publishes important contributions from the U.K. and abroad. Articles and commentaries are published with sufficient speed to ensure that they are truly current.