The Clinical Impact of Seropositivity on Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept: A Real-World Iraqi Experience.

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2022-06-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S368190
Asal Ridha, Saba Hussein, Ali AlJabban, Levent Mert Gunay, Faiq I Gorial, Nizar Abdulateef Al Ani
{"title":"The Clinical Impact of Seropositivity on Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept: A Real-World Iraqi Experience.","authors":"Asal Ridha,&nbsp;Saba Hussein,&nbsp;Ali AlJabban,&nbsp;Levent Mert Gunay,&nbsp;Faiq I Gorial,&nbsp;Nizar Abdulateef Al Ani","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S368190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)'s seropositivity on treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients with RA registered in Baghdad Teaching Hospital Registry from May 2012 to August 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years, meeting the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, being treated with etanercept, and followed up at ≥1 year after etanercept initiation were included; patients who received any other biologics for RA were excluded. Patients were classified as seropositive (RF- and ACPA-positive), seronegative (RF- and ACPA-negative), RF-positive, RF-negative, ACPA-positive, and ACPA-negative. The primary outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) which were measured at one year after treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, a total of 1318 (88.3%) patients were seropositive; 1122 (75.2%) and 1054 (70.6%) patients were RF- and ACPA-positive, respectively. Baseline mean CDAI scores were significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.001) higher among seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients. The baseline mean DAS28 score was also significantly higher in ACPA-positive group compared with the ACPA-negative group (<i>P</i> = 0.021). At baseline, the number of patients who had high CDAI scores was significantly higher among the seropositive, RF-positive, and ACPA-positive groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.001, and <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively). After one year of treatment with etanercept, among seropositive versus seronegative and ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative groups, there was a significant improvement in terms of the mean CDAI score (<i>P</i> = 0.004 and <i>P</i> = 0.017, respectively) and CDAI response (<i>P</i> = 0.011 and <i>P</i> = 0.048, respectively). At one year, the proportion of patients among the seropositive versus seronegative group who reached remission were 566 (42.9%) versus 78 (44.6%) and 642 (47.3%) versus 83 (47.4%), for CDAI and DAS28 response, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results imply that seropositivity and ACPA-positivity may influence the treatment response in patients with RA, who were treated with etanercept.</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/33/oarrr-14-113.PMC9215842.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S368190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the clinical impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)'s seropositivity on treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with RA registered in Baghdad Teaching Hospital Registry from May 2012 to August 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years, meeting the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, being treated with etanercept, and followed up at ≥1 year after etanercept initiation were included; patients who received any other biologics for RA were excluded. Patients were classified as seropositive (RF- and ACPA-positive), seronegative (RF- and ACPA-negative), RF-positive, RF-negative, ACPA-positive, and ACPA-negative. The primary outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) which were measured at one year after treatment initiation.

Results: At baseline, a total of 1318 (88.3%) patients were seropositive; 1122 (75.2%) and 1054 (70.6%) patients were RF- and ACPA-positive, respectively. Baseline mean CDAI scores were significantly (P = 0.001) higher among seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients. The baseline mean DAS28 score was also significantly higher in ACPA-positive group compared with the ACPA-negative group (P = 0.021). At baseline, the number of patients who had high CDAI scores was significantly higher among the seropositive, RF-positive, and ACPA-positive groups (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). After one year of treatment with etanercept, among seropositive versus seronegative and ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative groups, there was a significant improvement in terms of the mean CDAI score (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively) and CDAI response (P = 0.011 and P = 0.048, respectively). At one year, the proportion of patients among the seropositive versus seronegative group who reached remission were 566 (42.9%) versus 78 (44.6%) and 642 (47.3%) versus 83 (47.4%), for CDAI and DAS28 response, respectively.

Conclusion: The results imply that seropositivity and ACPA-positivity may influence the treatment response in patients with RA, who were treated with etanercept.

Abstract Image

依那西普治疗的类风湿关节炎患者血清阳性对治疗反应的临床影响:一个真实的伊拉克经验。
目的:评价类风湿因子(RF)和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(ACPA)血清阳性对依那西普治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者治疗反应的影响。患者和方法:回顾性分析2012年5月至2019年8月在巴格达教学医院登记的类风湿性关节炎患者。纳入年龄≥18岁,符合ACR/EULAR 2010 RA标准,接受依那西普治疗,依那西普开始治疗后随访≥1年的患者;接受任何其他生物制剂治疗RA的患者被排除在外。患者分为血清阳性(RF和acpa阳性)、血清阴性(RF和acpa阴性)、RF阳性、RF阴性、acpa阳性和acpa阴性。主要结局包括临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)和疾病活动评分28 (DAS28),这是在治疗开始一年后测量的。结果:基线时,共有1318例(88.3%)患者血清阳性;RF阳性1122例(75.2%),acpa阳性1054例(70.6%)。血清阳性患者的基线平均CDAI评分显著高于血清阴性患者(P = 0.001)。acpa阳性组的基线平均DAS28评分也显著高于acpa阴性组(P = 0.021)。基线时,血清阳性组、rf阳性组和acpa阳性组中CDAI评分较高的患者数量显著高于对照组(P = 0.001、P = 0.001和P = 0.002)。依那西普治疗一年后,血清阳性组与血清阴性组、acpa阳性组与acpa阴性组在平均CDAI评分(P = 0.004和P = 0.017)和CDAI反应(P = 0.011和P = 0.048)方面均有显著改善。一年后,血清阳性组和血清阴性组达到缓解的患者比例分别为566人(42.9%)对78人(44.6%),642人(47.3%)对83人(47.4%)。结论:依那西普治疗的RA患者血清acpa阳性和血清acpa阳性可能影响其治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信