Hospital-Based Same-Day Compared to Overnight-Stay Mastectomy: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Udai S Sibia, John R Klune, Justin J Turcotte, Luther H Holton, Adam I Riker
{"title":"Hospital-Based Same-Day Compared to Overnight-Stay Mastectomy: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.","authors":"Udai S Sibia,&nbsp;John R Klune,&nbsp;Justin J Turcotte,&nbsp;Luther H Holton,&nbsp;Adam I Riker","doi":"10.31486/toj.21.0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for mastectomy has resulted in increased use of outpatient same-day mastectomy (SDM). Whether SDM leads to increased readmissions or reoperations is not well documented. This study examines national data to compare outcomes of SDM to an overnight stay. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File from 2016 to 2018 for all mastectomy cases. Cases with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day were excluded. Cases were then categorized into 2 LOS cohorts: SDM vs 1-day LOS. <b>Results:</b> A total of 22,642 cases (80.8% 1-day LOS vs 19.2% SDM) were identified for the final analysis. Patients in the 1-day LOS group were more likely to be older (57.9 vs 54.0 years, <i>P</i><0.01), be female (98.0% vs 79.8%, <i>P</i><0.01), and have greater comorbidity (38.1% vs 30.7% American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3 or 4, <i>P</i><0.01) compared to the SDM group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no difference in risk for 30-day wound complications between the SDM and 1-day LOS groups. The risks for 30-day medical complications (1.60 odds ratio [OR], 95% CI 1.06-2.42, <i>P</i>=0.02), reoperations (1.46 OR, 95% CI 1.17-1.81, <i>P</i><0.01), and readmissions (1.60 OR, 95% CI 1.25-2.05, <i>P</i><0.01) were higher in the 1-day LOS group. Even after excluding patients undergoing reoperation on the day of surgery, the risk for reoperations (2.3% vs 3.3%, <i>P</i><0.01) remained higher in the 1-day LOS group. Characteristics associated with 1-day LOS were hypertension, steroid use, diabetes, dyspnea, dependent functional status, bilateral procedures, and breast reconstruction. <b>Conclusion:</b> We demonstrate that SDM is a safe procedure, with no increase in risk for 30-day postoperative complications. Appropriate patients should be offered SDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"22 2","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196968/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.21.0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for mastectomy has resulted in increased use of outpatient same-day mastectomy (SDM). Whether SDM leads to increased readmissions or reoperations is not well documented. This study examines national data to compare outcomes of SDM to an overnight stay. Methods: We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File from 2016 to 2018 for all mastectomy cases. Cases with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day were excluded. Cases were then categorized into 2 LOS cohorts: SDM vs 1-day LOS. Results: A total of 22,642 cases (80.8% 1-day LOS vs 19.2% SDM) were identified for the final analysis. Patients in the 1-day LOS group were more likely to be older (57.9 vs 54.0 years, P<0.01), be female (98.0% vs 79.8%, P<0.01), and have greater comorbidity (38.1% vs 30.7% American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3 or 4, P<0.01) compared to the SDM group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no difference in risk for 30-day wound complications between the SDM and 1-day LOS groups. The risks for 30-day medical complications (1.60 odds ratio [OR], 95% CI 1.06-2.42, P=0.02), reoperations (1.46 OR, 95% CI 1.17-1.81, P<0.01), and readmissions (1.60 OR, 95% CI 1.25-2.05, P<0.01) were higher in the 1-day LOS group. Even after excluding patients undergoing reoperation on the day of surgery, the risk for reoperations (2.3% vs 3.3%, P<0.01) remained higher in the 1-day LOS group. Characteristics associated with 1-day LOS were hypertension, steroid use, diabetes, dyspnea, dependent functional status, bilateral procedures, and breast reconstruction. Conclusion: We demonstrate that SDM is a safe procedure, with no increase in risk for 30-day postoperative complications. Appropriate patients should be offered SDM.

以医院为基础的当天乳房切除术与过夜乳房切除术的比较:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划分析。
背景:乳房切除术术后恢复的增强导致门诊当日乳房切除术(SDM)的使用增加。SDM是否会导致再入院或再手术的增加并没有很好的记录。本研究检查了国家数据,以比较SDM和过夜住宿的结果。方法:我们分析了2016年至2018年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划参与者使用数据文件中所有乳房切除术病例。排除住院时间(LOS) >1天的病例。然后将病例分为2个LOS队列:SDM vs 1天LOS。结果:共有22,642例(80.8%的1天LOS vs 19.2%的SDM)被确定为最终分析。1天LOS组患者更有可能年龄较大(57.9 vs 54.0岁,PPPP=0.02),再手术(1.46 OR, 95% CI 1.17-1.81, PPPP)。结论:我们证明SDM是一种安全的手术,没有增加术后30天并发症的风险。适当的患者应给予SDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信