Accounting for concurrent antihyperglycemic medication changes in dietary and physical activity interventions: A focused literature review.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dennis B Campbell, Dana Lee Olstad, Teagan Donald, David Jt Campbell
{"title":"Accounting for concurrent antihyperglycemic medication changes in dietary and physical activity interventions: A focused literature review.","authors":"Dennis B Campbell,&nbsp;Dana Lee Olstad,&nbsp;Teagan Donald,&nbsp;David Jt Campbell","doi":"10.1177/14791641221111252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize methods used to account for antihyperglycemic medication changes in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of dietary and physical activity interventions on glycemia among adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using studies included in two recently published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials examining the glycemic effects of dietary and physical activity interventions, we evaluated how each study accounted for antihyperglycemic medication changes. Data were analyzed using summary statistics, stratified by the type of intervention studied, and each was assigned a score from 0 to 6 reflecting the strength of medication controls employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 22 physical activity focused and 27 dietary focused articles. Our scoring system yielded a mean concurrent medication adjustment score of 3.9/6 for the physical activity studies and a score of 1.7/6 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for the dietary studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that randomized controlled trials included in recent systematic reviews of physical activity and dietary interventions did not robustly account or control for changes in antihyperglycemic medications, with physical activity interventions doing so more robustly than dietary interventions. This is a threat to the validity of study findings, as observed glycemic changes may in fact be attributable to imbalances in concurrent medication adjustments between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11092,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","volume":" ","pages":"14791641221111252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/36/10.1177_14791641221111252.PMC9234854.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641221111252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To summarize methods used to account for antihyperglycemic medication changes in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of dietary and physical activity interventions on glycemia among adults with diabetes.

Methods: Using studies included in two recently published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials examining the glycemic effects of dietary and physical activity interventions, we evaluated how each study accounted for antihyperglycemic medication changes. Data were analyzed using summary statistics, stratified by the type of intervention studied, and each was assigned a score from 0 to 6 reflecting the strength of medication controls employed.

Results: We evaluated 22 physical activity focused and 27 dietary focused articles. Our scoring system yielded a mean concurrent medication adjustment score of 3.9/6 for the physical activity studies and a score of 1.7/6 (p < 0.001) for the dietary studies.

Conclusions: We found that randomized controlled trials included in recent systematic reviews of physical activity and dietary interventions did not robustly account or control for changes in antihyperglycemic medications, with physical activity interventions doing so more robustly than dietary interventions. This is a threat to the validity of study findings, as observed glycemic changes may in fact be attributable to imbalances in concurrent medication adjustments between groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

考虑饮食和身体活动干预中并发的降糖药物变化:一篇重点文献综述。
目的:总结在评估饮食和体育活动干预对成人糖尿病患者血糖影响的随机对照试验中用于解释降糖药物变化的方法。方法:利用最近发表的两项随机对照试验的系统综述,研究饮食和体育活动干预对血糖的影响,我们评估了每项研究如何解释降糖药物的变化。采用汇总统计方法对数据进行分析,并按所研究的干预类型进行分层,每个干预类型的评分为0到6分,反映所采用的药物控制的强度。结果:我们评估了22篇以体育活动为重点的文章和27篇以饮食为重点的文章。我们的评分系统显示,体育活动研究的平均同时服药调整评分为3.9/6,饮食研究的平均同时服药调整评分为1.7/6 (p < 0.001)。结论:我们发现,在最近关于体育活动和饮食干预的系统综述中,随机对照试验并没有强有力地解释或控制降糖药物的变化,体育活动干预比饮食干预更有力地说明或控制降糖药物的变化。这对研究结果的有效性构成了威胁,因为观察到的血糖变化实际上可能归因于组间同步药物调整的不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research is the first international peer-reviewed journal to unite diabetes and vascular disease in a single title. The journal publishes original papers, research letters and reviews. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信