Derivation and validation of an improved pediatric shock index for predicting need for early intervention and outcomes in pediatric trauma.

Nathan Georgette, Robert Keskey, David Hampton, Emily Alberto, Nikunj Chokshi, Tanya L Zakrison, Kenneth Wilson, Alisa McQueen, Randall S Burd, Mark B Slidell
{"title":"Derivation and validation of an improved pediatric shock index for predicting need for early intervention and outcomes in pediatric trauma.","authors":"Nathan Georgette,&nbsp;Robert Keskey,&nbsp;David Hampton,&nbsp;Emily Alberto,&nbsp;Nikunj Chokshi,&nbsp;Tanya L Zakrison,&nbsp;Kenneth Wilson,&nbsp;Alisa McQueen,&nbsp;Randall S Burd,&nbsp;Mark B Slidell","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000003727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA), has been widely applied in pediatric trauma but has limited precision because of the reference ranges used in its derivation. We hypothesized that a pediatric shock index (PSI) equation based on age-based vital signs would outperform SIPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of trauma patients aged 1 to 18 years from Trauma Quality Programs - Participant Use File 2010 to 2018 was performed. A random 70% training subset was used to derive Youden index-optimizing shock index (SI) cutoffs by age for blood transfusion within 4 hours. We used linear regression to derive equations representing the PSI cutoff for children 12 years or younger and 13 years or older. For children 13 years or older, the well-established SI of 0.9 remained optimal, consistent with SIPA and other indices. For children 12 years or younger in the 30% validation subset, we compared our age-based PSI to SIPA as predictors of early transfusion, mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, and injury severity score of ≥25. For bedside use, a simplified \"rapid\" pediatric shock index (rPSI) equation was also derived and compared with SIPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 439,699 patients aged 1 to 12 years met the inclusion criteria with 2,718 (1.3% of those with available outcome data) requiring transfusion within 4 hours of presentation. In the validation set, positive predictive values for early transfusion were higher for PSI (8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-9.1%) and rPSI (6.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-6.9%) than SIPA (4.3%; 95% CI, 3.9-4.7%). For early transfusion, negative predictive values for both PSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.3%) and rPSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.4%) were similar to SIPA (99.4%; 95% CI, 99.3-99.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We derived the PSI and rPSI for use in pediatric trauma using empiric, age-based SI cutoffs. The PSI and rPSI achieved higher positive predictive values and similar negative predictive values to SIPA in predicting the need for early blood transfusion and mortality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic/Epidemiological; level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"474-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA), has been widely applied in pediatric trauma but has limited precision because of the reference ranges used in its derivation. We hypothesized that a pediatric shock index (PSI) equation based on age-based vital signs would outperform SIPA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of trauma patients aged 1 to 18 years from Trauma Quality Programs - Participant Use File 2010 to 2018 was performed. A random 70% training subset was used to derive Youden index-optimizing shock index (SI) cutoffs by age for blood transfusion within 4 hours. We used linear regression to derive equations representing the PSI cutoff for children 12 years or younger and 13 years or older. For children 13 years or older, the well-established SI of 0.9 remained optimal, consistent with SIPA and other indices. For children 12 years or younger in the 30% validation subset, we compared our age-based PSI to SIPA as predictors of early transfusion, mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, and injury severity score of ≥25. For bedside use, a simplified "rapid" pediatric shock index (rPSI) equation was also derived and compared with SIPA.

Results: A total of 439,699 patients aged 1 to 12 years met the inclusion criteria with 2,718 (1.3% of those with available outcome data) requiring transfusion within 4 hours of presentation. In the validation set, positive predictive values for early transfusion were higher for PSI (8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-9.1%) and rPSI (6.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-6.9%) than SIPA (4.3%; 95% CI, 3.9-4.7%). For early transfusion, negative predictive values for both PSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.3%) and rPSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.4%) were similar to SIPA (99.4%; 95% CI, 99.3-99.4%).

Conclusion: We derived the PSI and rPSI for use in pediatric trauma using empiric, age-based SI cutoffs. The PSI and rPSI achieved higher positive predictive values and similar negative predictive values to SIPA in predicting the need for early blood transfusion and mortality.

Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological; level III.

改进的儿童休克指数的推导和验证,用于预测儿童创伤早期干预的需要和结果。
背景:儿童年龄调整休克指数(SIPA)在儿童创伤中得到了广泛的应用,但由于其推导过程中使用的参考范围有限,其准确性有限。我们假设基于年龄的生命体征的儿科休克指数(PSI)方程将优于SIPA。方法:对创伤质量项目参与者使用档案2010年至2018年1至18岁的创伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。采用随机70%训练子集,按年龄推导约登指数优化休克指数(SI)截止值,在4小时内输血。我们使用线性回归推导了代表12岁或以下儿童和13岁或以上儿童的PSI截止值的方程。对于13岁或13岁以上的儿童,公认的SI为0.9仍然是最佳的,与SIPA和其他指标一致。对于30%验证子集中12岁或以下的儿童,我们比较了基于年龄的PSI和SIPA作为早期输血、死亡率、儿科重症监护病房入院和损伤严重程度评分≥25的预测因子。对于床边应用,还推导了简化的“快速”儿科休克指数(rPSI)方程,并与SIPA进行了比较。结果:共有439,699例1至12岁的患者符合纳入标准,其中2,718例(占可获得结果数据的1.3%)需要在就诊后4小时内输血。在验证集中,PSI的早期输血阳性预测值更高(8.3%;95%置信区间[CI], 7.5-9.1%)和rPSI (6.3%;95% CI, 5.7-6.9%)高于SIPA (4.3%;95% ci, 3.9-4.7%)。对于早期输血,PSI阴性预测值为99.3%;95% CI, 99.2-99.3%)和rPSI (99.3%;95% CI, 99.2-99.4%)与SIPA相似(99.4%;95% ci, 99.3-99.4%)。结论:我们根据经验,基于年龄的SI截止值推导出PSI和rPSI用于儿科创伤。PSI和rPSI在预测早期输血需求和死亡率方面具有较高的阳性预测值,与SIPA具有相似的阴性预测值。证据水平:预后/流行病学;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信