Ulnar nerve decompression with osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary elbow osteoarthritis.

Hyojune Kim, Erica Kholinne, Jae-Man Kwak
{"title":"Ulnar nerve decompression with osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary elbow osteoarthritis.","authors":"Hyojune Kim,&nbsp;Erica Kholinne,&nbsp;Jae-Man Kwak","doi":"10.1177/10225536221109914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to suggest treatment guidline for primary elbow OA with ulnar nerve neuropathy or high-grade stiffness by evaluating the effect of ulnar nerve decompression on the outcome of osteocapsular arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients who underwent primary osteocapsular arthroplasty for elbow OA were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical outcomes were evaluated for pain score (visual analog scale; VAS), range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The ulnar nerve decompression was performed for (1) ulnar nerve neuropathy, and (2) high-grade stiffness of flexion, defined as the flexion angle, is <90°. Patients were categorized into the two groups: ulnar nerve decompression group (UD group, <i>n</i> = 11) and the non-decompression group (Non-UD group, <i>n</i> = 19). The surgical outcome was compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary elbow OA with cubital tunnel syndrome or high-grade stiffness showed comparable improvement in MEPS, VAS, and ROM arc at final follow-up in the UD group compared with the non-UD group (UD group vs. non-UD group: MEPS 85.91 vs 86.84, <i>p</i>-value = 0.824, VAS 1.46 vs 1.16, <i>p</i>-value = 0.588, ROM arc 108 vs 109, <i>p</i>-value = 0.949). Improvement in ROM arc at 2 years follow-up was significantly higher in UD group (UD group vs. non-UD group: ROM arc difference, 42 vs 14, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteocapsular arthroplasty with ulnar nerve decompression for primary elbow OA with ulnar nerve neuropathy or high-grade stiffness provided improved motion arc and compatible clinical results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221109914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221109914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to suggest treatment guidline for primary elbow OA with ulnar nerve neuropathy or high-grade stiffness by evaluating the effect of ulnar nerve decompression on the outcome of osteocapsular arthroplasty.

Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent primary osteocapsular arthroplasty for elbow OA were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical outcomes were evaluated for pain score (visual analog scale; VAS), range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The ulnar nerve decompression was performed for (1) ulnar nerve neuropathy, and (2) high-grade stiffness of flexion, defined as the flexion angle, is <90°. Patients were categorized into the two groups: ulnar nerve decompression group (UD group, n = 11) and the non-decompression group (Non-UD group, n = 19). The surgical outcome was compared between the groups.

Results: Primary elbow OA with cubital tunnel syndrome or high-grade stiffness showed comparable improvement in MEPS, VAS, and ROM arc at final follow-up in the UD group compared with the non-UD group (UD group vs. non-UD group: MEPS 85.91 vs 86.84, p-value = 0.824, VAS 1.46 vs 1.16, p-value = 0.588, ROM arc 108 vs 109, p-value = 0.949). Improvement in ROM arc at 2 years follow-up was significantly higher in UD group (UD group vs. non-UD group: ROM arc difference, 42 vs 14, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Osteocapsular arthroplasty with ulnar nerve decompression for primary elbow OA with ulnar nerve neuropathy or high-grade stiffness provided improved motion arc and compatible clinical results.

Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

尺神经减压联合骨囊置换术治疗原发性肘骨关节炎。
目的:本研究的目的是通过评估尺神经减压对骨囊置换术结果的影响,为伴有尺神经病变或高度僵硬的原发性肘关节骨性关节炎提供治疗指南。方法:对30例肘关节骨性关节炎患者行骨囊置换术进行回顾性分析。对手术结果进行疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表;VAS)、活动范围(ROM)和Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS)。(1)尺神经病变,(2)高度屈曲僵硬度,定义为屈曲角度,n = 11)和非减压组(Non-UD组,n = 19)进行尺神经减压。比较两组手术效果。结果:与非UD组相比,合并肘管综合征或高度僵硬的原发性肘关节OA在最终随访时MEPS、VAS和ROM弧的改善程度相当(UD组与非UD组:MEPS 85.91 vs 86.84, p值= 0.824,VAS 1.46 vs 1.16, p值= 0.588,ROM弧108 vs 109, p值= 0.949)。UD组2年随访时ROM弧度的改善明显高于非UD组(UD组与非UD组:ROM弧度差异,42 vs 14, p = 0.002)。结论:骨囊置换术联合尺神经减压治疗伴有尺神经病变或高度僵硬的原发性肘关节骨性关节炎,改善了运动弧度,并获得了一致的临床结果。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信