Can American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score prevent unnecessary MRI in isolated ankle ligament injuries?

Veysel Kandemir, Mehmet Sait Akar, Şeyhmus Yiğit, Fatih Durgut, Ramazan Atiç, Emin Özkul
{"title":"Can American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score prevent unnecessary MRI in isolated ankle ligament injuries?","authors":"Veysel Kandemir,&nbsp;Mehmet Sait Akar,&nbsp;Şeyhmus Yiğit,&nbsp;Fatih Durgut,&nbsp;Ramazan Atiç,&nbsp;Emin Özkul","doi":"10.1177/10225536221131374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Ankle injuries are the most common musculoskeletal injuries. Its incidence is also high among sports injuries. Direct X-ray, ultrasound and MRI can be requested after the history and physical examination in the patient who presents with ankle ligament injury. Some classifications are used for requesting direct X-ray after ankle injury. Since clear limits are not specified in the literature for MRI, the rate of unnecessary MRI examinations is high. We argue that the decision can be made according to the AOFAS score to be checked before MR is requested, and thus unnecessary MR requests can be reduced.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Ankle MRI images of patients who underwent ankle MRI due to ankle trauma between January 2018 and December 2020 were scanned. 328 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. Patients with AOFAS scores in their outpatient clinic records were identified. AOFAS scores of patients with at least one ligament injury and those with normal MR images were statistically compared. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the AOFAS score using ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with ligament damage as a result of MRI examination were 21.3% (n=70), and patients without any ligament damage were 78.7% (n=258). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of AOFAS between the group with ligament damage and the group without ligament damage (p&lt; 0.05). In the ROC analysis, the AOFAS threshold value for MR request was determined as 80.5 (84.3% sensitivity and 72.3% specificity). Based on the determined threshold value, 73 patients who had unnecessary MRI would have been eliminated, thus reducing the number of MRIs by 42.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AOFAS scores of patients with ligament damage were statistically significantly lower than those of patients without ligament pathology. Unnecessary MRI can be significantly prevented by using the AOFAS score in ankle traumas without bone fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":520682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221131374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221131374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Ankle injuries are the most common musculoskeletal injuries. Its incidence is also high among sports injuries. Direct X-ray, ultrasound and MRI can be requested after the history and physical examination in the patient who presents with ankle ligament injury. Some classifications are used for requesting direct X-ray after ankle injury. Since clear limits are not specified in the literature for MRI, the rate of unnecessary MRI examinations is high. We argue that the decision can be made according to the AOFAS score to be checked before MR is requested, and thus unnecessary MR requests can be reduced.

Material and method: Ankle MRI images of patients who underwent ankle MRI due to ankle trauma between January 2018 and December 2020 were scanned. 328 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. Patients with AOFAS scores in their outpatient clinic records were identified. AOFAS scores of patients with at least one ligament injury and those with normal MR images were statistically compared. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the AOFAS score using ROC analysis.

Results: Patients with ligament damage as a result of MRI examination were 21.3% (n=70), and patients without any ligament damage were 78.7% (n=258). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of AOFAS between the group with ligament damage and the group without ligament damage (p< 0.05). In the ROC analysis, the AOFAS threshold value for MR request was determined as 80.5 (84.3% sensitivity and 72.3% specificity). Based on the determined threshold value, 73 patients who had unnecessary MRI would have been eliminated, thus reducing the number of MRIs by 42.6%.

Conclusion: The AOFAS scores of patients with ligament damage were statistically significantly lower than those of patients without ligament pathology. Unnecessary MRI can be significantly prevented by using the AOFAS score in ankle traumas without bone fractures.

美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分能否预防孤立性踝关节韧带损伤的不必要MRI ?
简介与目的:踝关节损伤是最常见的肌肉骨骼损伤。它在运动损伤中的发病率也很高。踝关节韧带损伤患者在病史和体格检查后可要求进行直接x线、超声和MRI检查。一些分类用于踝关节损伤后要求直接x光检查。由于文献中对MRI没有明确的限制,因此不必要的MRI检查率很高。我们认为可以根据请求MR前需要检查的AOFAS分数来决定,这样可以减少不必要的MR请求。材料与方法:对2018年1月至2020年12月因踝关节创伤接受踝关节MRI检查的患者的踝关节MRI图像进行扫描。328名符合标准的患者被纳入研究。确定门诊记录中有AOFAS评分的患者。对至少一处韧带损伤患者与MR影像正常患者的AOFAS评分进行统计学比较。采用ROC分析确定AOFAS评分的敏感性和特异性。结果:MRI检查有韧带损伤的患者占21.3% (n=70),无韧带损伤的患者占78.7% (n=258)。有韧带损伤组与无韧带损伤组的AOFAS比较,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在ROC分析中,AOFAS诊断MR请求的阈值为80.5(敏感性84.3%,特异性72.3%)。根据确定的阈值,73例不必要的MRI患者将被淘汰,从而减少了42.6%的MRI次数。结论:有韧带损伤患者的AOFAS评分明显低于无韧带病变患者。在无骨折的踝关节创伤中使用AOFAS评分可以显著避免不必要的MRI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信