Seventeenth-Century Scotism and the War Just on Both Sides.

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2022.0030

Daniel Schwartz

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can a war can be just on both sides? Within the Western just war tradition, Catholic theologians traditionally held wars on both sides to be logically impossible. This view went unchallenged until questioned by two seventeenth-century Irish Franciscan Scotists. These were Aodh Mac Cathmhaoil (Hugo Cavellus) and John Punch. In this paper I lay out the Scotist theological grounds that led them to admit to the possibility of wars just on both sides. I also conjecture on possible reasons why Punch refrained from revising traditional just war theory in light of his own far-reaching theological conclusions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

17世纪的苏格兰和双方的战争。

一场战争能对双方都公正吗?在西方的正义战争传统中，天主教神学家传统上认为双方的战争在逻辑上是不可能的。这种观点一直没有受到质疑，直到17世纪的两个爱尔兰方济会苏格兰人提出质疑。他们是奥德·麦克·卡姆哈尔(雨果·卡维勒斯饰)和约翰·潘趣。在这篇文章中，我列出了苏格兰人的神学基础，使他们承认双方都有可能发生战争。我还推测了为什么潘趣没有根据自己深远的神学结论来修正传统的正义战争理论的可能原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.