Caregivers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Pressure Injuries in Spinal Cord Injury at Rehabilitation Center in Bangladesh.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2022-06-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8642900
Niraj Singh Tharu, Monzurul Alam, Shristi Bajracharya, Gautam Prasad Chaudhary, Jitendra Pandey, Mohammad A Kabir
{"title":"Caregivers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Pressure Injuries in Spinal Cord Injury at Rehabilitation Center in Bangladesh.","authors":"Niraj Singh Tharu,&nbsp;Monzurul Alam,&nbsp;Shristi Bajracharya,&nbsp;Gautam Prasad Chaudhary,&nbsp;Jitendra Pandey,&nbsp;Mohammad A Kabir","doi":"10.1155/2022/8642900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine caregivers' knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on the prevention and care of pressure injuries (PIs) in individuals with spinal cord injury. A quantitative cross-sectional study with descriptive correlation design was used to implement a modified semistructured questionnaire using a convenient sampling method. McDonald's standard of learning outcome measurement criteria was used to categorize caregivers' KAP. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) was utilized to assess the relationships between caregivers' KAP, with a <i>p</i> value of 0.05 or less considered statistically significant. The study findings indicate that caregivers had a moderate level of knowledge (M = 73.68%, SD = 6.43), a neutral attitude (M = 70.32%, SD = 6.89), and a moderate level of practice (M = 74.77%, SD = 9.08). A positive correlation existed between caregivers' knowledge and attitude (<i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.01), as well as between knowledge and practice (<i>r</i> = 0.37, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no correlation between attitude and practice (<i>r</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> > 0.05). The study findings suggest that caregivers need to develop a positive attitude and expand their knowledge in order to improve their practice. The KAP factors that require higher priority were positioning and turning the patient, preventing skin breakdown, assessing weight changes over time, interest in patient care, additional care for PIs, frequently changing the individual's position, priority to PI care, interest in other types of care other than PIs, using special cushions, consulting doctors on a regular basis, being aware of clothing and fabrics, proper transfer technique, pressure relief, and skin inspection, among others.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"8642900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213162/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8642900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine caregivers' knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on the prevention and care of pressure injuries (PIs) in individuals with spinal cord injury. A quantitative cross-sectional study with descriptive correlation design was used to implement a modified semistructured questionnaire using a convenient sampling method. McDonald's standard of learning outcome measurement criteria was used to categorize caregivers' KAP. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was utilized to assess the relationships between caregivers' KAP, with a p value of 0.05 or less considered statistically significant. The study findings indicate that caregivers had a moderate level of knowledge (M = 73.68%, SD = 6.43), a neutral attitude (M = 70.32%, SD = 6.89), and a moderate level of practice (M = 74.77%, SD = 9.08). A positive correlation existed between caregivers' knowledge and attitude (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), as well as between knowledge and practice (r = 0.37, p < 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no correlation between attitude and practice (r = 0.12, p > 0.05). The study findings suggest that caregivers need to develop a positive attitude and expand their knowledge in order to improve their practice. The KAP factors that require higher priority were positioning and turning the patient, preventing skin breakdown, assessing weight changes over time, interest in patient care, additional care for PIs, frequently changing the individual's position, priority to PI care, interest in other types of care other than PIs, using special cushions, consulting doctors on a regular basis, being aware of clothing and fabrics, proper transfer technique, pressure relief, and skin inspection, among others.

Abstract Image

孟加拉国康复中心护理人员对脊髓损伤压力损伤的知识、态度和实践。
本研究的目的是确定护理人员在脊髓损伤患者压力损伤(pi)预防和护理方面的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。采用描述性相关设计的定量横断面研究,采用方便的抽样方法设计改进的半结构化问卷。使用麦当劳学习成果测量标准对照顾者的KAP进行分类。使用Pearson积差相关系数(r)来评估照顾者KAP之间的关系,p值小于等于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。研究结果表明,护理人员的知识水平为中等(M = 73.68%, SD = 6.43),态度为中性(M = 70.32%, SD = 6.89),实践水平为中等(M = 74.77%, SD = 9.08)。照护者的知识与态度、知识与实践存在正相关(r = 0.37, p < 0.01)。然而,态度与实践之间没有相关性(r = 0.12, p > 0.05)。研究结果表明,护理人员需要培养积极的态度,扩大自己的知识,以提高他们的做法。需要优先考虑的KAP因素有:病人的体位和翻身、防止皮肤破裂、评估体重随时间的变化、对病人护理的兴趣、对PI的额外护理、经常改变个人的体位、优先考虑PI护理、对PI以外的其他类型护理的兴趣、使用特殊的垫子、定期咨询医生、注意衣服和织物、适当的转移技术、减压和皮肤检查等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信