Sometimes needs change minds: Interests and values as determinants of attitudes towards state support for the self-employed during the COVID-19 crisis.

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Journal of European Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1177/09589287221106977
Giuliano Bonoli, Flavia Fossati, Mia Gandenberger, Carlo Michael Knotz
{"title":"Sometimes needs change minds: Interests and values as determinants of attitudes towards state support for the self-employed during the COVID-19 crisis.","authors":"Giuliano Bonoli,&nbsp;Flavia Fossati,&nbsp;Mia Gandenberger,&nbsp;Carlo Michael Knotz","doi":"10.1177/09589287221106977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This contribution investigates public attitudes toward providing financial help to the self-employed, a less well-researched area in the otherwise vibrant literature on welfare state attitudes. We analyse to what extent the self-employed themselves soften their general anti-statist stance in times of need, and how the public thinks about supporting those who usually tend to oppose government interventions. To answer these questions, we study public attitudes towards providing financial aid to the self-employed during the lockdowns adopted in response to the COVID pandemic in Switzerland, using survey data collected in the spring and in the autumn of 2020. The results show that most respondents favour the provision of financial support. In addition, the self-employed are the staunchest supporters of the more generous forms of help, like non-refundable payments. We conclude that, when exposed to significant economic risk, need and interests override ideological preferences for less state intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Social Policy","volume":"32 4","pages":"407-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301353/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221106977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This contribution investigates public attitudes toward providing financial help to the self-employed, a less well-researched area in the otherwise vibrant literature on welfare state attitudes. We analyse to what extent the self-employed themselves soften their general anti-statist stance in times of need, and how the public thinks about supporting those who usually tend to oppose government interventions. To answer these questions, we study public attitudes towards providing financial aid to the self-employed during the lockdowns adopted in response to the COVID pandemic in Switzerland, using survey data collected in the spring and in the autumn of 2020. The results show that most respondents favour the provision of financial support. In addition, the self-employed are the staunchest supporters of the more generous forms of help, like non-refundable payments. We conclude that, when exposed to significant economic risk, need and interests override ideological preferences for less state intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有时需要改变想法:在2019冠状病毒病危机期间,利益和价值观是对国家支持个体经营者态度的决定因素。
这篇文章调查了公众对向个体经营者提供经济帮助的态度,这是一个在其他充满活力的关于福利国家态度的文献中研究较少的领域。我们分析了在需要的时候,个体经营者在多大程度上软化了他们的反中央集权立场,以及公众如何考虑支持那些通常倾向于反对政府干预的人。为了回答这些问题,我们利用2020年春季和秋季收集的调查数据,研究了在瑞士为应对COVID大流行而采取的封锁期间,公众对向自营职业者提供经济援助的态度。结果显示,大多数受访者赞成提供财政支持。此外,自雇人士是更慷慨的帮助形式的最坚定支持者,比如不退款的付款。我们的结论是,当面临重大经济风险时,需求和利益压倒了减少国家干预的意识形态偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of European Social Policy publishes articles on all aspects of social policy in Europe. Papers should make a contribution to understanding and knowledge in the field, and we particularly welcome scholarly papers which integrate innovative theoretical insights and rigorous empirical analysis, as well as those which use or develop new methodological approaches. The Journal is interdisciplinary in scope and both social policy and Europe are conceptualized broadly. Articles may address multi-level policy making in the European Union and elsewhere; provide cross-national comparative studies; and include comparisons with areas outside Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信