Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality for Teens: A Promising Frontline Intervention for Addressing Adolescent Suicidality.

Molly Adrian, Jennifer B Blossom, Phuonguyen V Chu, David Jobes, Elizabeth McCauley
{"title":"Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality for Teens: A Promising Frontline Intervention for Addressing Adolescent Suicidality.","authors":"Molly Adrian,&nbsp;Jennifer B Blossom,&nbsp;Phuonguyen V Chu,&nbsp;David Jobes,&nbsp;Elizabeth McCauley","doi":"10.1037/pri0000156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot open trial examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality for teens (CAMS-4Teens) who presented to outpatient care with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Participants were 22 adolescents (13-17; 59% identified as female) with clinical elevations (≥7) on the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. We also explored outcomes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, as well as mixed effects modeling for weekly assessments of the Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Assessment constructs. Our main implementation outcomes suggest that the intervention is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to deliver. Clinicians were adherent to the model with high ratings of adherence. In addition, preliminary evaluation of suicidal thoughts and behaviors found a large effect size for reduction in suicidal thoughts. Benchmarking to other adolescent suicide specific interventions and the Collaborative Assessment of Management of Suicidality with adult populations provide promise that suicidal adolescent responses may be on par with established interventions. Findings from the study are preliminary in nature and intended to inform if CAMS with adolescents is a promising approach to engage and treat patient-defined \"drivers\" of suicide. The results suggest that a future investigation with power to detect significant change over another active intervention is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":74486,"journal":{"name":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"7 2","pages":"154-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211019/pdf/nihms-1718061.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This pilot open trial examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality for teens (CAMS-4Teens) who presented to outpatient care with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Participants were 22 adolescents (13-17; 59% identified as female) with clinical elevations (≥7) on the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. We also explored outcomes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, as well as mixed effects modeling for weekly assessments of the Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Assessment constructs. Our main implementation outcomes suggest that the intervention is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to deliver. Clinicians were adherent to the model with high ratings of adherence. In addition, preliminary evaluation of suicidal thoughts and behaviors found a large effect size for reduction in suicidal thoughts. Benchmarking to other adolescent suicide specific interventions and the Collaborative Assessment of Management of Suicidality with adult populations provide promise that suicidal adolescent responses may be on par with established interventions. Findings from the study are preliminary in nature and intended to inform if CAMS with adolescents is a promising approach to engage and treat patient-defined "drivers" of suicide. The results suggest that a future investigation with power to detect significant change over another active intervention is warranted.

青少年自杀行为的协同评估与管理:解决青少年自杀行为的一线干预。
本试点公开试验考察了有自杀想法和行为的青少年自杀行为协同评估和管理(CAMS-4Teens)的可行性、可接受性和初步结果。参与者为22名青少年(13-17岁;(59%为女性)自杀行为修正问卷(SBQ-R)临床评分≥7分。主要结局是可行性和可接受性。我们还探讨了自杀想法和行为的结果,以及每周评估自杀状态表(SSF)核心评估结构的混合效应建模。我们的主要实施结果表明,干预措施是可接受的、适当的和可行的。临床医生对该模型的依从性评分较高。此外,对自杀想法和行为的初步评估发现,自杀想法的减少有很大的效应量。对其他青少年自杀特定干预措施进行基准测试,以及对成人群体自杀管理的协作评估,为自杀青少年的反应可能与既定干预措施相当提供了希望。这项研究的发现是初步的,旨在告知青少年CAMS是否是一种有希望的方法,可以吸引和治疗患者定义的自杀“驱动因素”。结果表明,未来的调查有能力发现另一种积极干预的重大变化是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信