CONSORT compliance in randomized surgical trials assessing the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effectiveness of preoperative drug management of patients undergoing mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 3区医学

Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.4317/medoral.25494

E-L Cetira-Filho, A-F Vieira, P-H Sales, P-G Silva, F-W Costa

{"title":"CONSORT compliance in randomized surgical trials assessing the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effectiveness of preoperative drug management of patients undergoing mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping review.","authors":"E-L Cetira-Filho, A-F Vieira, P-H Sales, P-G Silva, F-W Costa","doi":"10.4317/medoral.25494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Investigate methodological quality of clinical trials in mandibular third molar surgery and its compliance with the consort statement.Material and methods: An electronic search was performed in five journal websites, chose the five scientific journals with the greatest impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery according to the SCImago Journal Rank. The compliance of studies with the CONSORT statement was assessed. Also, the risk of bias of each study was evaluated.Results: Twenty-nine studies were included. The average CONSORT compliance score was 25.50 (79.68%). Most studies were performed in the Americas (n = 14, 48.3%) and Asia (n = 10, 34.5%). Parallel-group (n=15, 51.7%) and split-mouth RCTs (n=11, 38%) were the most prevalent study design. An inverse correlation was observed between the year of publication and the number of Scopus citations (p<0.001), time between acceptance and publication (p<0.001), and time between study completion and publication (p=0.040).Conclusions: Understanding the correct use of guidelines, such as the CONSORT statement, is necessary to reduce methodological errors and possible bias, thereby ensuring reliable knowledge dissemination.","PeriodicalId":18351,"journal":{"name":"Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal","volume":" ","pages":"e550-e559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648644/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Investigate methodological quality of clinical trials in mandibular third molar surgery and its compliance with the consort statement.

Material and methods: An electronic search was performed in five journal websites, chose the five scientific journals with the greatest impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery according to the SCImago Journal Rank. The compliance of studies with the CONSORT statement was assessed. Also, the risk of bias of each study was evaluated.

Results: Twenty-nine studies were included. The average CONSORT compliance score was 25.50 (79.68%). Most studies were performed in the Americas (n = 14, 48.3%) and Asia (n = 10, 34.5%). Parallel-group (n=15, 51.7%) and split-mouth RCTs (n=11, 38%) were the most prevalent study design. An inverse correlation was observed between the year of publication and the number of Scopus citations (p<0.001), time between acceptance and publication (p<0.001), and time between study completion and publication (p=0.040).

Conclusions: Understanding the correct use of guidelines, such as the CONSORT statement, is necessary to reduce methodological errors and possible bias, thereby ensuring reliable knowledge dissemination.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估下颌第三磨牙手术患者术前药物管理镇痛和抗炎效果的随机外科试验中的CONSORT依从性:一项范围审查。

背景:探讨下颌第三磨牙手术临床试验的方法学质量及其对配偶声明的依从性。材料与方法:在5个期刊网站进行电子检索，根据SCImago期刊排名选择影响因子最大的5种口腔颌面外科科学期刊。评估了研究是否符合CONSORT声明。同时，对每项研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。结果:纳入29项研究。CONSORT依从性评分平均为25.50分(79.68%)。大多数研究在美洲(n = 14, 48.3%)和亚洲(n = 10, 34.5%)进行。平行组(n=15, 51.7%)和裂口rct (n=11, 38%)是最普遍的研究设计。论文发表年份与Scopus被引次数呈负相关(p结论:了解CONSORT声明等指南的正确使用对于减少方法学错误和可能的偏倚是必要的，从而确保可靠的知识传播。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal Medicine-Surgery

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology