Incidence and clinical course of COVID-19 in patients using omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria and/or severe allergic asthma and using mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: A single center real life experience.

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Reyhan Yıldız, Yavuz Selim Demirel, Vesile Dilşad Mungan, Ömür Aydın, Betül Ayşe Sin, Meltem Ağca, Sevim Bavbek
{"title":"Incidence and clinical course of COVID-19 in patients using omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria and/or severe allergic asthma and using mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: A single center real life experience.","authors":"Reyhan Yıldız,&nbsp;Yavuz Selim Demirel,&nbsp;Vesile Dilşad Mungan,&nbsp;Ömür Aydın,&nbsp;Betül Ayşe Sin,&nbsp;Meltem Ağca,&nbsp;Sevim Bavbek","doi":"10.5578/tt.20229702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess the incidence and course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma/chronic spontaneous urticaria using biological agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 202 patients (142 with asthma, and 60 with urticaria) were enrolled. The subjects were asked via face-to-face or telephone interview whether they had been diagnosed with COVID-19 and the course of the disease.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Study group consisted of 132 women, and 70 men (median age= 48 years). Median omalizumab dose was 300 mg/month in asthma (min-max= 150-1200 mg). The mepolizumab dose of two patients diagnosed with EGPA was 300 mg/month. Thirty one (15.3%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 22 (71%) of whom were receiving omalizumab and nine (29%) were receiving mepolizumab. Asthma or chronic spontaneous urticaria diagnosis, age, sex, smoking, weight, comorbidities, atopy, and biological agent use were not statistically different between patients with or without COVID-19. Nine COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, and three of them required intensive care. Mepolizumab usage was higher in hospitalized patients (5, 55.6%), whereas omalizumab usage was higher in home-treated patients (18, 81%). The mean duration of biological use in home-treated patients was significantly higher than that of the hospitalized patients (35.64 months vs. 22.56 months, p= 0.024). Biological treatment was interrupted in 47 (23%) patients, selfinterruption due to the infection risk was the foremost reason (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of COVID-19 among patients with asthma and urticaria on mepolizumab and omalizumab was higher compared to studies from other countries. The disease course appeared mild in patients receiving long-term biological therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20229702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the incidence and course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma/chronic spontaneous urticaria using biological agents.

Materials and methods: A total of 202 patients (142 with asthma, and 60 with urticaria) were enrolled. The subjects were asked via face-to-face or telephone interview whether they had been diagnosed with COVID-19 and the course of the disease.

Result: Study group consisted of 132 women, and 70 men (median age= 48 years). Median omalizumab dose was 300 mg/month in asthma (min-max= 150-1200 mg). The mepolizumab dose of two patients diagnosed with EGPA was 300 mg/month. Thirty one (15.3%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 22 (71%) of whom were receiving omalizumab and nine (29%) were receiving mepolizumab. Asthma or chronic spontaneous urticaria diagnosis, age, sex, smoking, weight, comorbidities, atopy, and biological agent use were not statistically different between patients with or without COVID-19. Nine COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, and three of them required intensive care. Mepolizumab usage was higher in hospitalized patients (5, 55.6%), whereas omalizumab usage was higher in home-treated patients (18, 81%). The mean duration of biological use in home-treated patients was significantly higher than that of the hospitalized patients (35.64 months vs. 22.56 months, p= 0.024). Biological treatment was interrupted in 47 (23%) patients, selfinterruption due to the infection risk was the foremost reason (34%).

Conclusions: The incidence of COVID-19 among patients with asthma and urticaria on mepolizumab and omalizumab was higher compared to studies from other countries. The disease course appeared mild in patients receiving long-term biological therapy.

使用奥玛珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹和/或严重过敏性哮喘的患者和使用美泊珠单抗治疗严重嗜酸性哮喘的患者的COVID-19发病率和临床病程:单中心真实生活体验
前言:应用生物制剂评估重症哮喘/慢性自发性荨麻疹患者COVID-19的发病率和病程。材料与方法:共纳入202例患者(哮喘142例,荨麻疹60例)。研究人员通过面对面或电话采访的方式询问受试者是否被诊断出患有COVID-19以及疾病的病程。结果:研究组女性132例,男性70例(中位年龄48岁)。哮喘患者中位奥玛珠单抗剂量为300 mg/月(min-max= 150-1200 mg)。2例诊断为EGPA的患者的mepolizumab剂量为300 mg/月。31例(15.3%)患者被诊断为COVID-19,其中22例(71%)接受奥玛珠单抗治疗,9例(29%)接受美波珠单抗治疗。哮喘或慢性自发性荨麻疹的诊断、年龄、性别、吸烟、体重、合并症、特应性和生物制剂的使用在患有或不患有COVID-19的患者之间没有统计学差异。9名COVID-19患者住院,其中3人需要重症监护。Mepolizumab在住院患者中的使用率较高(55.6%),而omalizumab在家庭治疗患者中的使用率较高(18.81%)。在家治疗的患者使用生物制剂的平均时间显著高于住院患者(35.64个月比22.56个月,p= 0.024)。47例(23%)患者中断生物治疗,因感染风险而自行中断治疗的占34%。结论:与其他国家的研究相比,美泊珠单抗和奥玛珠单抗治疗的哮喘和荨麻疹患者中COVID-19的发病率更高。长期接受生物治疗的患者病程较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信