Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability.

IF 2.8
Megumi Ota, Hiroshige Tateuchi, Takaya Hashiguchi, Karen Fujiwara, Ayano Sasaki, Kiseki Okumura, Noriaki Ichihashi
{"title":"Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability.","authors":"Megumi Ota,&nbsp;Hiroshige Tateuchi,&nbsp;Takaya Hashiguchi,&nbsp;Karen Fujiwara,&nbsp;Ayano Sasaki,&nbsp;Kiseki Okumura,&nbsp;Noriaki Ichihashi","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46-0.75, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511721/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF).

Methods: Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis.

Results: The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46-0.75, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

框架减法在动态姿态稳定中的有效性。
背景:可以使用帧减法计算目标对象的运动。然而,这种动态姿态稳定性评价方法的有效性尚未得到明确。本研究旨在验证基于地面反作用力(GRF)的框架减法评分评价方法的有效性。方法:20例受试者进行单腿起跳着陆,根据GRF计算动态姿势稳定性指数(DPSI)、中外侧稳定性指数(MLSI)、前后稳定性指数和垂直稳定性指数(VSI)。同时,用数码摄像机在矢状面和额状面捕捉运动图像。采用帧减法对运动图像进行分析后,分别计算正面、矢状面和组合面的帧减法得分。为了验证其有效性,使用Pearson相关分析研究了帧减法得分与GRF参数之间的关系。结果:正位面及合并面框差评分与DPSI、MLSI、VSI呈显著相关(r = 0.46-0.75, P)。结论:框差法可用于动态姿势稳定性评价。无标记系统在临床实践中被认为是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书