Self-Awareness Multilevel Assessment Scale (SAMAS): psychometric analysis of inter-rater reliability.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Umberto Bivona, Giulia Ferri, Maria De Luca, Susanna Lucatello, Marta Aloisi, Marianna Contrada, Paola Ciurli, Valentina Bandiera, Paola Lo Sterzo, Giorgio Lombardi, Rita Formisano, Alberto Costa
{"title":"Self-Awareness Multilevel Assessment Scale (SAMAS): psychometric analysis of inter-rater reliability.","authors":"Umberto Bivona,&nbsp;Giulia Ferri,&nbsp;Maria De Luca,&nbsp;Susanna Lucatello,&nbsp;Marta Aloisi,&nbsp;Marianna Contrada,&nbsp;Paola Ciurli,&nbsp;Valentina Bandiera,&nbsp;Paola Lo Sterzo,&nbsp;Giorgio Lombardi,&nbsp;Rita Formisano,&nbsp;Alberto Costa","doi":"10.4415/ANN_22_03_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acquired brain injury (sABI) frequently causes impairment in self-awareness (ISA), leading to reduced patients' compliance to treatment, worse functional outcome, and high caregiver distress. Self-awareness (SA) is a multilevel and complex function that, as such, requires a specific and effective assessment. To date, many tools are available to evaluate the declarative, but not emergent and anticipatory levels of awareness, therefore the Self-Awareness Multilevel Assessment Scale (SAMAS) was recently proposed. The new tool proved to be useful to assess SA at different levels across all domains of functioning (motor, cognitive, psycho-behavioural, etc.) because it measures not only the declarative SA, but also emergent and anticipatory levels of SA, thus overcoming some important limits of other current assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the SAMAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four professionals blind to each other evaluated 12 patients with sABI. Each patient was rated by two professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater reliability was moderate-to-excellent, adding evidence in support of the use of SAMAS to specifically diagnose ISA after sABI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SAMAS can help to better address neurorehabilitation, as it allows assessing ISA as early as possible, at all possible levels of awareness and functional domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_22_03_06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Severe acquired brain injury (sABI) frequently causes impairment in self-awareness (ISA), leading to reduced patients' compliance to treatment, worse functional outcome, and high caregiver distress. Self-awareness (SA) is a multilevel and complex function that, as such, requires a specific and effective assessment. To date, many tools are available to evaluate the declarative, but not emergent and anticipatory levels of awareness, therefore the Self-Awareness Multilevel Assessment Scale (SAMAS) was recently proposed. The new tool proved to be useful to assess SA at different levels across all domains of functioning (motor, cognitive, psycho-behavioural, etc.) because it measures not only the declarative SA, but also emergent and anticipatory levels of SA, thus overcoming some important limits of other current assessment methods.

Aim: This study evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the SAMAS.

Methods: Four professionals blind to each other evaluated 12 patients with sABI. Each patient was rated by two professionals.

Results: Inter-rater reliability was moderate-to-excellent, adding evidence in support of the use of SAMAS to specifically diagnose ISA after sABI.

Conclusions: The SAMAS can help to better address neurorehabilitation, as it allows assessing ISA as early as possible, at all possible levels of awareness and functional domains.

自我意识多层次评定量表:量表间信度的心理测量分析。
背景:重度获得性脑损伤(sABI)经常导致自我意识(ISA)的损害,导致患者对治疗的依从性降低,功能预后恶化,以及高照顾者痛苦。自我意识(SA)是一个多层次的复杂功能,因此需要一个具体而有效的评估。迄今为止,有许多工具可用于评估陈述性意识水平,但没有紧急和预期意识水平,因此最近提出了自我意识多层次评估量表(SAMAS)。新工具被证明对评估所有功能领域(运动、认知、心理-行为等)不同水平的SA是有用的,因为它不仅测量陈述性SA,而且还测量突发和预期水平的SA,从而克服了其他现有评估方法的一些重要局限性。目的:评估SAMAS量表的量表间信度(IRR)。方法:4名专业人员对12例sABI患者进行盲法评估。每个病人都由两位专业人士评定。结果:评分者间信度为中等至优异,增加了支持使用SAMAS特异性诊断sABI后ISA的证据。结论:SAMAS可以帮助更好地解决神经康复问题,因为它可以尽早评估ISA,在所有可能的意识水平和功能领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews. The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office. The journal is in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信