Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage.

Q3 Medicine
Kevin Wang, Jay C Wang, Soshian Sarrafpour
{"title":"Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage.","authors":"Kevin Wang,&nbsp;Jay C Wang,&nbsp;Soshian Sarrafpour","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe a case of a patient on anticoagulation who underwent XEN45 (XEN) gel stent placement and subsequently developed kissing suprachoroidal hemorrhages (SCHs) requiring surgical drainage.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) aims to achieve effective control of intraocular pressure (IOP) while minimizing the complications associated with traditional glaucoma surgeries. Rarely, a severe complication of intraocular surgery is SCH, which can result from early postoperative hypotony. The XEN gel stent is a MIGS device that theoretically avoids the risk of hypotony due to its outflow resistance properties. However, cases of SCH associated with XEN gel stents have been reported.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A monocular 86-year-old Caucasian male with glaucoma and atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban underwent routine XEN gel stent placement with mitomycin C in his only seeing eye. On postoperative day 3, he presented with severe eye pain and worsening vision. He was found to have a SCH that gradually progressed to kissing suprachoroidals that required surgical drainage. After extensive discussion, the decision was made to hold the patient's rivaroxaban given his monocular status. The patient subsequently had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) 1 week after drainage, but his symptoms gradually resolved after restarting anticoagulation. Two months after drainage, the patient's SCH had completely resolved, and he had recovered baseline visual acuity with excellent IOP control-off medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the importance of quick and appropriate management of complications following glaucoma surgery, as well as discussion with patients regarding risks of treatments and return precautions. It also is a reminder that although many new surgical interventions are \"minimally invasive,\" those like the XEN that are more effective at IOP control may have a similar risk profile to more traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy. As such, risk factors like anticoagulation use and older age should be considered in anticipation of surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The XEN gel stent is a new surgical option for glaucoma patients that asserts a better safety profile than traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy, but our case of kissing SCHs requiring surgical intervention following XEN placement reminds us that even minimally invasive surgeries can have devastating complications.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Wang K, Wang JC, Sarrafpour S. Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(2):132-135.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":"16 2","pages":"132-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/fd/jocgp-16-132.PMC9452709.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: To describe a case of a patient on anticoagulation who underwent XEN45 (XEN) gel stent placement and subsequently developed kissing suprachoroidal hemorrhages (SCHs) requiring surgical drainage.

Background: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) aims to achieve effective control of intraocular pressure (IOP) while minimizing the complications associated with traditional glaucoma surgeries. Rarely, a severe complication of intraocular surgery is SCH, which can result from early postoperative hypotony. The XEN gel stent is a MIGS device that theoretically avoids the risk of hypotony due to its outflow resistance properties. However, cases of SCH associated with XEN gel stents have been reported.

Case description: A monocular 86-year-old Caucasian male with glaucoma and atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban underwent routine XEN gel stent placement with mitomycin C in his only seeing eye. On postoperative day 3, he presented with severe eye pain and worsening vision. He was found to have a SCH that gradually progressed to kissing suprachoroidals that required surgical drainage. After extensive discussion, the decision was made to hold the patient's rivaroxaban given his monocular status. The patient subsequently had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) 1 week after drainage, but his symptoms gradually resolved after restarting anticoagulation. Two months after drainage, the patient's SCH had completely resolved, and he had recovered baseline visual acuity with excellent IOP control-off medications.

Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of quick and appropriate management of complications following glaucoma surgery, as well as discussion with patients regarding risks of treatments and return precautions. It also is a reminder that although many new surgical interventions are "minimally invasive," those like the XEN that are more effective at IOP control may have a similar risk profile to more traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy. As such, risk factors like anticoagulation use and older age should be considered in anticipation of surgical intervention.

Clinical significance: The XEN gel stent is a new surgical option for glaucoma patients that asserts a better safety profile than traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy, but our case of kissing SCHs requiring surgical intervention following XEN placement reminds us that even minimally invasive surgeries can have devastating complications.

How to cite this article: Wang K, Wang JC, Sarrafpour S. Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(2):132-135.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

XEN凝胶植入后脉络膜上出血需要手术引流。
目的:描述一例接受抗凝治疗的患者接受了XEN45 (XEN)凝胶支架置入术,随后发生了亲吻性脉络膜上出血(SCHs),需要手术引流。背景:微创青光眼手术(minimal invasive glaucoma surgery, MIGS)的目的是在有效控制眼压的同时,尽量减少传统青光眼手术的并发症。眼内手术罕见的严重并发症是斜视,可由术后早期低眼压引起。XEN凝胶支架是一种MIGS装置,理论上可以避免由于其流出阻力特性而导致的低斜度风险。然而,已报道了与XEN凝胶支架相关的SCH病例。病例描述:一位86岁的单眼白人男性,患有青光眼和房颤,服用利伐沙班,在他唯一能看见的眼睛中常规放置了丝裂霉素C的XEN凝胶支架。术后第3天,患者出现严重的眼痛和视力恶化。他被发现有一个SCH,逐渐发展到吻脉络膜上,需要手术引流。经过广泛的讨论,鉴于患者的单眼状况,决定保留患者的利伐沙班。患者引流1周后发生脑血管意外(CVA),恢复抗凝治疗后症状逐渐消退。引流两个月后,患者的斜视完全消失,并通过良好的IOP控制药物恢复了基线视力。结论:本病例强调了青光眼手术后并发症的快速和适当管理的重要性,以及与患者讨论治疗风险和复发预防措施。这也提醒我们,尽管许多新的手术干预是“微创的”,但像XEN这样在控制IOP方面更有效的手术,可能与小梁切除术等更传统的手术有相似的风险。因此,在预期手术干预时应考虑使用抗凝剂和年龄较大等危险因素。临床意义:XEN凝胶支架是青光眼患者的一种新的手术选择,与小梁切除术等传统手术相比,它具有更好的安全性,但我们的案例提醒我们,在XEN置入后需要手术干预的亲吻性白内障,即使是微创手术也可能有毁灭性的并发症。王凯,王建军,Sarrafpour S. XEN凝胶植入后脉络膜上出血需要手术引流。中华青光眼杂志(英文版);2009;16(2):359 - 361。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信