Combined Analysis of Two Parallel Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Coated and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Lesions.

Bruno Scheller, Norman Mangner, Muhamad Ali S K Abdul Kader, Wan Azman Wan Ahmad, Raban Jeger, Jochen Wöhrle, Tiong Kiam Ong, Houng Bang Liew, Tommaso Gori, Felix Mahfoud, Amin Ariff Nuruddin, Felix Woitek, Imran Zainal Abidin, Carsten Schwenke, Beatrix Schnorr, Rosli Mohd Ali
{"title":"Combined Analysis of Two Parallel Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Coated and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Lesions.","authors":"Bruno Scheller,&nbsp;Norman Mangner,&nbsp;Muhamad Ali S K Abdul Kader,&nbsp;Wan Azman Wan Ahmad,&nbsp;Raban Jeger,&nbsp;Jochen Wöhrle,&nbsp;Tiong Kiam Ong,&nbsp;Houng Bang Liew,&nbsp;Tommaso Gori,&nbsp;Felix Mahfoud,&nbsp;Amin Ariff Nuruddin,&nbsp;Felix Woitek,&nbsp;Imran Zainal Abidin,&nbsp;Carsten Schwenke,&nbsp;Beatrix Schnorr,&nbsp;Rosli Mohd Ali","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) are a preferred treatment option for coronary in-stent restenosis. To date, data from randomized trials of alternative drug coatings are lacking. The aim of the randomized Malaysian and German-Swiss randomized trials was to investigate a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with a PCB in in-stent restenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred one patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis were enrolled in 2 identical randomized trials comparing the novel SCB (SeQuent SCB, 4 μg/mm²) with the clinically proven PCB (SeQuent Please, 3 μg/mm²). Primary end point was angiographic late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary end points included procedural success, major adverse cardiac events, and individual clinical end points such as stent thrombosis, cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and binary restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no differences in baseline parameters. After 6 months, in-segment late lumen loss was 0.25±0.57 mm in the PCB group versus 0.26±0.60 mm in the SCB group. Mean difference between SCB and PCB was 0.01 (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.24). Noninferiority at a predefined margin of 0.35 was shown. Clinical events up to 12 months did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This first-in man comparison of a novel SCB with a crystalline coating showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in the treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis compared with PCB.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov; Unique identifier: NCT02996318, NCT03242096.</p>","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e012305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) are a preferred treatment option for coronary in-stent restenosis. To date, data from randomized trials of alternative drug coatings are lacking. The aim of the randomized Malaysian and German-Swiss randomized trials was to investigate a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with a PCB in in-stent restenosis.

Methods: One hundred one patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis were enrolled in 2 identical randomized trials comparing the novel SCB (SeQuent SCB, 4 μg/mm²) with the clinically proven PCB (SeQuent Please, 3 μg/mm²). Primary end point was angiographic late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary end points included procedural success, major adverse cardiac events, and individual clinical end points such as stent thrombosis, cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and binary restenosis.

Results: Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no differences in baseline parameters. After 6 months, in-segment late lumen loss was 0.25±0.57 mm in the PCB group versus 0.26±0.60 mm in the SCB group. Mean difference between SCB and PCB was 0.01 (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.24). Noninferiority at a predefined margin of 0.35 was shown. Clinical events up to 12 months did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: This first-in man comparison of a novel SCB with a crystalline coating showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in the treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis compared with PCB.

Registration: URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02996318, NCT03242096.

西罗莫司包被和紫杉醇包被球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄两项平行随机试验的联合分析。
背景:紫杉醇包被球囊(PCBs)是冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的首选治疗方案。迄今为止,缺乏替代药物涂层的随机试验数据。马来西亚和德国-瑞士随机试验的目的是研究一种新型西罗莫司涂层球囊(SCB)与PCB在支架内再狭窄中的比较。方法:将101例药物洗脱支架内再狭窄患者纳入两项相同的随机试验,将新型SCB (SeQuent SCB, 4 μg/mm²)与临床证实的PCB (SeQuent Please, 3 μg/mm²)进行比较。主要终点为6个月时血管造影晚期管腔损失。次要终点包括手术成功、主要心脏不良事件和个体临床终点,如支架血栓形成、心源性死亡、靶病变心肌梗死、临床驱动靶病变血运重建术和二元再狭窄。结果:定量冠状动脉造影显示基线参数无差异。6个月后,PCB组的节段内晚期管腔损失为0.25±0.57 mm, SCB组为0.26±0.60 mm。SCB和PCB的平均差异为0.01 (95% CI, -0.23 ~ 0.24)。非劣效性在预定义的0.35的裕度显示。12个月的临床事件在两组之间没有差异。结论:与PCB相比,新型SCB与结晶涂层在治疗冠状动脉药物洗脱支架内再狭窄方面的血管造影和临床结果相似。注册:网址:https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov;唯一标识符:NCT02996318, NCT03242096。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信