The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test: Normal ulnohumeral gap difference in healthy volunteers.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nattakorn Mahasupachai, Nutthakorn Samathi, Arnakorn Premsiri, Cholawish Chanlalit
{"title":"The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test: Normal ulnohumeral gap difference in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Nattakorn Mahasupachai,&nbsp;Nutthakorn Samathi,&nbsp;Arnakorn Premsiri,&nbsp;Cholawish Chanlalit","doi":"10.1177/10225536221128861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test may be a good preoperative diagnostic tool for posterolateral rotatory instability, especially in atraumatic or occult cases. However, there is lack of study on the living population or the normal elbow. <b>Hypothesis/Purpose:</b> This study evaluates the ulnohumeral opening gap difference between elbows in resting and stress positions while performing ultrasonography in normal healthy volunteers. The hypothesis is that the normal ulnohumeral opening gap difference is less than 2 mm. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 21 participants (9 males and 12 females) who presented at our institution between May and June 2021 were recruited. First, participants with elbow deformity, major elbow trauma, history of injection or surgery around the elbow, or evidence of elbow instability were excluded. Only healthy elbows without symptoms were included in this study. Participants' both elbows were examined using ultrasonography. The ulnohumeral gap was measured in millimeters, and the difference was calculated from the means of ulnohumeral gap in resting and stress positions. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of participants was 36.14 years old. No samples with hyperlaxity were included. Overall, the means of ulnohumeral gap in resting and stress positions were 2.55 ± 0.69 mm and 3.16 ± 0.80 mm, respectively. The average mean of overall ulnohumeral opening gap difference was 0.61 ± 0.32 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females (<i>p</i> = .989). The intraobserver reliability was 0.89 and 0.9 for resting and stress positions, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test shows that the ulnohumeral opening gap difference between resting and stress positions is less than 2 mm in healthy volunteers. <b>Clinical Relevance:</b> In patients with inconclusively-diagnosed PLRI, the sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test may be a reliable preoperative diagnosis tool, providing its non-invasiveness and the ability to assess the contralateral side as a comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221128861"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221128861","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test may be a good preoperative diagnostic tool for posterolateral rotatory instability, especially in atraumatic or occult cases. However, there is lack of study on the living population or the normal elbow. Hypothesis/Purpose: This study evaluates the ulnohumeral opening gap difference between elbows in resting and stress positions while performing ultrasonography in normal healthy volunteers. The hypothesis is that the normal ulnohumeral opening gap difference is less than 2 mm. Methods: A total of 21 participants (9 males and 12 females) who presented at our institution between May and June 2021 were recruited. First, participants with elbow deformity, major elbow trauma, history of injection or surgery around the elbow, or evidence of elbow instability were excluded. Only healthy elbows without symptoms were included in this study. Participants' both elbows were examined using ultrasonography. The ulnohumeral gap was measured in millimeters, and the difference was calculated from the means of ulnohumeral gap in resting and stress positions. Results: The mean age of participants was 36.14 years old. No samples with hyperlaxity were included. Overall, the means of ulnohumeral gap in resting and stress positions were 2.55 ± 0.69 mm and 3.16 ± 0.80 mm, respectively. The average mean of overall ulnohumeral opening gap difference was 0.61 ± 0.32 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females (p = .989). The intraobserver reliability was 0.89 and 0.9 for resting and stress positions, respectively. Conclusion: The sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test shows that the ulnohumeral opening gap difference between resting and stress positions is less than 2 mm in healthy volunteers. Clinical Relevance: In patients with inconclusively-diagnosed PLRI, the sonographic posterolateral rotatory stress test may be a reliable preoperative diagnosis tool, providing its non-invasiveness and the ability to assess the contralateral side as a comparison.

超声后外侧旋转应力试验:健康志愿者正常肱尺骨间隙差异。
背景:超声后外侧旋转应力测试可能是后外侧旋转不稳定的良好术前诊断工具,特别是在非外伤性或隐匿性病例中。然而,对生活人群或正常肘部的研究缺乏。假设/目的:本研究评估正常健康志愿者在静息位和应激位下肘关节开口间隙的差异。假设正常肱骨尺开口间隙差小于2mm。方法:共招募2021年5月至6月在我们机构就诊的21名参与者(9名男性,12名女性)。首先,肘部畸形、肘部严重创伤、肘部注射或手术史或肘部不稳定的证据被排除在外。本研究仅纳入无症状的健康肘部。使用超声检查参与者的双肘。尺肱骨间隙以毫米为单位测量,从静止和应力位置的尺肱骨间隙平均值计算差值。结果:参与者平均年龄36.14岁。未纳入有高血压的样本。总体而言,静息位和应力位尺骨骨间隙均值分别为2.55±0.69 mm和3.16±0.80 mm。整体肱骨尺开口间隙差平均值为0.61±0.32 mm。男女间差异无统计学意义(p = .989)。静息位和应激位的观察者内信度分别为0.89和0.9。结论:超声后外侧旋转应力试验显示,健康志愿者静息位与应力位之间尺骨开口间隙差小于2mm。临床意义:对于诊断不明确的PLRI患者,超声后外侧旋转压力测试可能是一种可靠的术前诊断工具,提供其无创性和评估对侧作为比较的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信