Mortality of adolescents with isolated traumatic brain injury does not vary with type of level I trauma center.

Zachary T Sheff, Brett W Engbrecht, Richard Rodgers, Lewis E Jacobson, Jodi L Smith
{"title":"Mortality of adolescents with isolated traumatic brain injury does not vary with type of level I trauma center.","authors":"Zachary T Sheff,&nbsp;Brett W Engbrecht,&nbsp;Richard Rodgers,&nbsp;Lewis E Jacobson,&nbsp;Jodi L Smith","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000003611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have lower mortality than those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs) or mixed trauma centers (MTCs). The primary objective of this study was to determine if adolescent patients (15-17 years) with isolated severe TBI also benefited from treatment at PTCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis using a national sample of adolescent trauma patients obtained from the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Program Participant Use Files for 2013 to 2017 (n = 3,524). Mortality, the primary outcome variable, was compared between Level I PTCs, ATCs, and MTCs using multiple logistic regression controlling for patient characteristics and injury severity. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, utilization of craniotomy, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to adjustment, patients treated at ATCs (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; p = 0.032) and MTCs (OR, 2.36; p = 0.070) appeared to be at greater risk of mortality than those treated at PTCs. However, after adjustment, this difference disappeared (ATC OR, 1.21; p = 0.733; MTC OR, 0.95; p = 0.919). Patients treated at ATCs and MTCs were more severely injured than those treated at PTCs and more likely to be admitted to an ICU (ATC OR, 2.12; p < 0.001; MTC OR, 1.91; p < 0.001). No other secondary outcome differed between center types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescent patients with isolated severe TBI treated at ATCs and MTCs had similar mortality risk as those treated at PTCs. The difference in injury severity across center types warrants additional research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"538-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Pediatric patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have lower mortality than those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs) or mixed trauma centers (MTCs). The primary objective of this study was to determine if adolescent patients (15-17 years) with isolated severe TBI also benefited from treatment at PTCs.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis using a national sample of adolescent trauma patients obtained from the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Program Participant Use Files for 2013 to 2017 (n = 3,524). Mortality, the primary outcome variable, was compared between Level I PTCs, ATCs, and MTCs using multiple logistic regression controlling for patient characteristics and injury severity. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, utilization of craniotomy, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS.

Results: Prior to adjustment, patients treated at ATCs (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; p = 0.032) and MTCs (OR, 2.36; p = 0.070) appeared to be at greater risk of mortality than those treated at PTCs. However, after adjustment, this difference disappeared (ATC OR, 1.21; p = 0.733; MTC OR, 0.95; p = 0.919). Patients treated at ATCs and MTCs were more severely injured than those treated at PTCs and more likely to be admitted to an ICU (ATC OR, 2.12; p < 0.001; MTC OR, 1.91; p < 0.001). No other secondary outcome differed between center types.

Conclusion: Adolescent patients with isolated severe TBI treated at ATCs and MTCs had similar mortality risk as those treated at PTCs. The difference in injury severity across center types warrants additional research.

Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.

青少年孤立性外伤性脑损伤的死亡率不随创伤中心类型的不同而变化。
背景:在儿科创伤中心(PTCs)治疗的孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患儿死亡率低于在成人创伤中心(ATCs)或混合创伤中心(MTCs)治疗的患儿。本研究的主要目的是确定孤立性严重TBI的青少年患者(15-17岁)是否也从ptc治疗中受益。方法:这是一项横断面分析,使用从2013年至2017年美国外科医师学会创伤质量计划参与者使用文件中获得的全国青少年创伤患者样本(n = 3524)。死亡率是主要的结局变量,使用多重逻辑回归控制患者特征和损伤严重程度,比较I级ptc、ATCs和MTCs之间的死亡率。次要结局包括出院处置、开颅手术的使用、重症监护病房(ICU)的使用、ICU住院时间(LOS)和住院时间(LOS)。结果:调整前,ATCs治疗的患者(优势比[OR], 2.76;p = 0.032)和MTCs (OR, 2.36;p = 0.070)似乎比在ptc治疗的患者有更高的死亡风险。但调整后,这种差异消失(ATC OR, 1.21;P = 0.733;MTC或0.95;P = 0.919)。在ATC和MTCs治疗的患者比在PTCs治疗的患者损伤更严重,更有可能进入ICU (ATC OR, 2.12;P < 0.001;MTC或1.91;P < 0.001)。中心类型之间没有其他次要结果差异。结论:青少年孤立性严重TBI患者在ATCs和MTCs治疗的死亡率与在PTCs治疗的相似。不同中心类型的损伤严重程度的差异值得进一步研究。证据水平:预后/流行病学;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信