[The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].

Der Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1
Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann
{"title":"[The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].","authors":"Matthé Scholten,&nbsp;Jakov Gather,&nbsp;Jochen Vollmann","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpretation of Article 12 of the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities led to a controversy over the implementation of the article in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>How can Article 12 CRPD be implemented in psychiatry in an ethically justifiable way?</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An empirically and legally informed conceptual and ethical analysis was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suggested combined supported decision making model ensures the recognition of people with mental disorders as persons before the law, their equal treatment in the informed consent process and the provision of supported decision making. According to this model, coercive treatment can only be carried out in accordance with the will and preferences of the person and is subject to further conditions of proportionality and review by an independent body.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined supported decision making model makes an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 CRPD possible in psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1093-1103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Der Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The interpretation of Article 12 of the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities led to a controversy over the implementation of the article in psychiatry.

Objective: How can Article 12 CRPD be implemented in psychiatry in an ethically justifiable way?

Material and method: An empirically and legally informed conceptual and ethical analysis was carried out.

Results: The suggested combined supported decision making model ensures the recognition of people with mental disorders as persons before the law, their equal treatment in the informed consent process and the provision of supported decision making. According to this model, coercive treatment can only be carried out in accordance with the will and preferences of the person and is subject to further conditions of proportionality and review by an independent body.

Conclusion: The combined supported decision making model makes an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 CRPD possible in psychiatry.

Abstract Image

[综合支持决策模型:联合国精神病学残疾人权利公约第12条在道德上合理实施的模板]。
背景:联合国残疾人权利委员会对《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)第12条的解释引发了一场关于该条款在精神病学领域实施的争议。目的:《残疾人权利公约》第12条如何在精神病学中以合乎道德的方式实施?材料和方法:进行了经验和法律知情的概念和伦理分析。结果:所建议的联合支持决策模式确保了精神障碍患者作为法律面前的人得到承认,在知情同意过程中得到平等对待,并提供支持决策。根据这一模式,强制治疗只能按照当事人的意愿和偏好进行,并须遵守进一步的相称性条件和由独立机构进行审查。结论:联合支持决策模型使精神病学在道德上合理地实施第12条CRPD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书