COVID-19 Vaccination Among Environmental Service Workers Using Agents of Change.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2022.185423
Christine Ortiz, Jana Shaw, Sue Murphy, Yobel Gonzalez Milian, John Kolh, Jason Rupert, Samantha Hanley, Telisa M Stewart
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccination Among Environmental Service Workers Using Agents of Change.","authors":"Christine Ortiz,&nbsp;Jana Shaw,&nbsp;Sue Murphy,&nbsp;Yobel Gonzalez Milian,&nbsp;John Kolh,&nbsp;Jason Rupert,&nbsp;Samantha Hanley,&nbsp;Telisa M Stewart","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2022.185423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to community immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Health care workers are at risk both of infection and for nosocomial transmission, but have low rates of vaccine uptake due to hesitancy. This project sought to improve the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake among environmental services (EVS) workers at a large academic regional medical center using a community-based participatory approach (CBPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CBPA engaged environmental service workers from January 2021 to March 2021. Public health experts and environmental services department leaders developed a 1-hour training for peer lay health educators (N=29), referred to as agents of change (AOC). AOC were trained on COVID-19 infection, benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and techniques to address vaccine misinformation among their peers. Following the program, we conducted semistructured interviews with the AOC to document their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the semistructured interviews shows that 89.6% of participants (N=26) felt the training was informative; 79.3% of participants (N=23) reported using personal testimony while engaging in discussions about vaccination with their peers, and the majority of participants (N=26, 89.6%) discussed vaccination outside of the workplace in other community settings. During the 2-month time span of the program, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination rates among the EVS staff increased by 21% (N=126 to N=189).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our CBPA program demonstrated an increase in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine uptake through using an AOC lay health educator model. As the need for COVID-19 vaccination continues, we must continue to investigate barriers and sources of hesitancy in order to address these through tailored interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":" ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477716/pdf/primer-6-23.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2022.185423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to community immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Health care workers are at risk both of infection and for nosocomial transmission, but have low rates of vaccine uptake due to hesitancy. This project sought to improve the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake among environmental services (EVS) workers at a large academic regional medical center using a community-based participatory approach (CBPA).

Methods: The CBPA engaged environmental service workers from January 2021 to March 2021. Public health experts and environmental services department leaders developed a 1-hour training for peer lay health educators (N=29), referred to as agents of change (AOC). AOC were trained on COVID-19 infection, benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and techniques to address vaccine misinformation among their peers. Following the program, we conducted semistructured interviews with the AOC to document their experiences.

Results: Analysis of the semistructured interviews shows that 89.6% of participants (N=26) felt the training was informative; 79.3% of participants (N=23) reported using personal testimony while engaging in discussions about vaccination with their peers, and the majority of participants (N=26, 89.6%) discussed vaccination outside of the workplace in other community settings. During the 2-month time span of the program, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination rates among the EVS staff increased by 21% (N=126 to N=189).

Conclusion: Our CBPA program demonstrated an increase in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine uptake through using an AOC lay health educator model. As the need for COVID-19 vaccination continues, we must continue to investigate barriers and sources of hesitancy in order to address these through tailored interventions.

使用变革剂的环境服务工作者接种COVID-19疫苗。
疫苗犹豫仍然是社区免疫SARS-CoV-2感染的障碍。卫生保健工作者面临感染和医院传播的风险,但由于犹豫不决,疫苗接种率很低。本项目旨在通过基于社区的参与式方法(CBPA)提高一家大型学术区域医疗中心环境服务(EVS)工作人员对SARS-CoV-2疫苗的吸收率。方法:CBPA于2021年1月至2021年3月招募环境服务工作者。公共卫生专家和环境服务部门领导为同行非专业健康教育者(N=29)开发了一项1小时的培训,称为变革推动者(AOC)。AOC接受了关于COVID-19感染、SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种益处以及解决同龄人中疫苗错误信息的技术培训。在这个项目之后,我们对AOC进行了半结构化的采访,以记录他们的经历。结果:半结构化访谈分析显示,89.6%的参与者(N=26)认为培训具有信息性;79.3%的参与者(N=23)报告在与同龄人讨论疫苗接种时使用个人证词,大多数参与者(N=26, 89.6%)在其他社区环境中讨论工作场所以外的疫苗接种。在该计划的2个月时间内,EVS工作人员的mRNA COVID-19疫苗接种率提高了21% (N=126至N=189)。结论:我们的CBPA程序通过使用AOC非专业健康教育者模型显示mRNA COVID-19疫苗摄取增加。随着COVID-19疫苗接种需求的持续,我们必须继续调查犹豫不决的障碍和根源,以便通过有针对性的干预措施解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信