Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Caudal Analgesia versus Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Lower Limb Surgeries in Pediatrics: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2022-09-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S372903
Rabab S S Mahrous, Amin A A Ahmed, Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed
{"title":"Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Caudal Analgesia versus Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Lower Limb Surgeries in Pediatrics: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study.","authors":"Rabab S S Mahrous,&nbsp;Amin A A Ahmed,&nbsp;Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S372903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Ultrasound (US) guided regional analgesia is a safe and effective method in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics with a high success rate rapid onset and fewer side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of US-guided caudal block versus US-guided peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and sciatic nerve blocks) in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 1-12 years scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgery during the period from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly allocated into two groups. Group C where pediatrics received US-guided caudal block, while in group P, pediatrics received US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks after the induction of general anesthesia (GA). The primary aim was to compare the postoperative pain (evaluated by the COMFORT pain score) between the two groups. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative opioids used parents' satisfaction and occurrence of side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pediatrics who underwent unilateral lower limb surgeries were allocated into two groups (group C and group P). There was no significant difference between patients' baseline characteristics and the postoperative pain score at 2, 4, 16, and 20 h.' However there was a statistical significance at 6, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, frequency of analgesia as well as the total postoperative dose of opiates (nalbuphine). Time to first analgesic (nalbuphine) requirement was significantly less in group C with a mean of (9.6±2.9 h) than in group P with a mean of (15.1±3.5 h). Parents of children in group P were more satisfied than those in group C with no recorded complications for both techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided lower limb peripheral nerve block is a simple and safe method to provide adequate and more prolonged analgesia compared to US-guided caudal block for lower limb surgeries in pediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/4b/lra-15-77.PMC9480592.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S372903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Ultrasound (US) guided regional analgesia is a safe and effective method in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics with a high success rate rapid onset and fewer side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of US-guided caudal block versus US-guided peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and sciatic nerve blocks) in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.

Methods: Children aged 1-12 years scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgery during the period from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly allocated into two groups. Group C where pediatrics received US-guided caudal block, while in group P, pediatrics received US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks after the induction of general anesthesia (GA). The primary aim was to compare the postoperative pain (evaluated by the COMFORT pain score) between the two groups. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative opioids used parents' satisfaction and occurrence of side effects.

Results: Pediatrics who underwent unilateral lower limb surgeries were allocated into two groups (group C and group P). There was no significant difference between patients' baseline characteristics and the postoperative pain score at 2, 4, 16, and 20 h.' However there was a statistical significance at 6, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, frequency of analgesia as well as the total postoperative dose of opiates (nalbuphine). Time to first analgesic (nalbuphine) requirement was significantly less in group C with a mean of (9.6±2.9 h) than in group P with a mean of (15.1±3.5 h). Parents of children in group P were more satisfied than those in group C with no recorded complications for both techniques.

Conclusion: US-guided lower limb peripheral nerve block is a simple and safe method to provide adequate and more prolonged analgesia compared to US-guided caudal block for lower limb surgeries in pediatrics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声引导下尾侧镇痛与周围神经阻滞在儿科下肢手术中的比较:一项随机对照前瞻性研究。
背景与目的:超声引导下局部镇痛是一种安全有效、成功率高、起效快、副作用少的儿科围手术期镇痛方法。本研究的目的是比较us引导的尾侧神经阻滞与us引导的周围神经阻滞(股神经和坐骨神经阻滞)在儿科单侧下肢手术围手术期镇痛的效果。方法:选取2020年1月~ 2021年12月拟行单侧下肢手术的1 ~ 12岁儿童,随机分为两组。C组患儿行us引导下的尾侧阻滞,P组患儿行全麻诱导后us引导下的股、坐骨神经阻滞。主要目的是比较两组之间的术后疼痛(通过COMFORT疼痛评分评估)。次要目的是比较围手术期阿片类药物使用父母的满意度和副作用的发生情况。结果:将接受单侧下肢手术的儿科患者分为两组(C组和P组),患者的基线特征和术后2、4、16和20 h的疼痛评分无显著差异。但术后6、8、12、24 h镇痛次数及术后阿片类药物(纳布啡)总剂量差异均有统计学意义。C组首次镇痛(纳布啡)需用时间(9.6±2.9 h)明显少于P组(15.1±3.5 h), P组患儿家长满意度高于C组,两种方法均无并发症记录。结论:在小儿下肢手术中,us引导下的下肢周围神经阻滞比us引导下的尾侧阻滞更能提供充足且更持久的镇痛,是一种简单安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信