Utility of Pulse Oximetry Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) with Incorporation of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (SpO2 10/FiO2 PEEP) for Classification and Prognostication of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7871579
Pratibha Todur, Anitha Nileshwar, Souvik Chaudhuri, Nitin Gupta, Srikant Natarajan, Shwethapriya Rao
{"title":"Utility of Pulse Oximetry Oxygen Saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) with Incorporation of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (SpO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>10/FiO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>PEEP) for Classification and Prognostication of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Pratibha Todur,&nbsp;Anitha Nileshwar,&nbsp;Souvik Chaudhuri,&nbsp;Nitin Gupta,&nbsp;Srikant Natarajan,&nbsp;Shwethapriya Rao","doi":"10.1155/2022/7871579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventionally, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (P/F ratio) has been used to categorize severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and prognostication of outcome. Recent literature has shown that incorporation of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) into the P/F ratio (PaO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>10/FiO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>PEEP or P/FP<i>∗</i>10) has a much better prognostic ability in ARDS as compared to P/F ratio. The aim of this study was to correlate SpO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>10/FiO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>PEEP (S/FP<i>∗</i>10) to PaO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>10/FiO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>PEEP (P/FP<i>∗</i>10) and evaluate the utility of S/FP<i>∗</i>10 as a reliable noninvasive indicator of oxygenation in ARDS to avoid repeated arterial blood sampling.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate if pulse oximetry is a reliable indicator of oxygenation in ARDS patients by calculating SpO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>10/FiO<sub>2</sub> <i>∗</i>PEEP (S/FP<i>∗</i>10). The primary objective was to determine the correlation of S/FP<i>∗</i>10 to P/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio in ARDS patients. The secondary objective was to determine the cut-off value of S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio to predict severe ARDS and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-80 years on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) diagnosed with ARDS as defined by the Berlin definition were included. The values of PaO<sub>2</sub>, FiO<sub>2</sub>, and SpO<sub>2</sub> were collected at three different time points. They were at baseline, i.e., after intubation and initiation of MV (within one hour of intubation), day one (1-24 hours of MV), and day three (48-72 hours of MV). The primary outcome was survival at the end of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 patients with ARDS on invasive MV were included. The data points were obtained at baseline, day one, and day three of MV. S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio has an excellent correlation to P/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio at baseline and day three of invasive MV (<i>r</i> = 0.831 and 0.853, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and has a strong correlation on day one of invasive MV (r = 0.733, <i>p</i> < 0.001). S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio ≤116 at baseline has excellent discriminant function to be categorized as severe ARDS as per Berlin definition (AUC: 0.925, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity, CI: [0.862-0.988]). The increase in S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio by ≥64.40 from baseline to day three of MV is a good predictor of survival (AUC: 0.877, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 73.5% sensitivity, 97% specificity, CI: [0.803-0.952]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>S/FP<i>∗</i>10 has a strong correlation to P/FP<i>∗</i>10 in ARDS patients. S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ≤116 has an excellent discriminant function to be categorized as severe ARDS. The S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio on day three of MV and the change in S/FP<i>∗</i>10 ratio from baseline and day one to day three of MV are good predictors of survival in ARDS patients. This trial is registered with CTRI/2020/04/024940.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"7871579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470362/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7871579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Conventionally, PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio) has been used to categorize severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and prognostication of outcome. Recent literature has shown that incorporation of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) into the P/F ratio (PaO2 10/FiO2 PEEP or P/FP10) has a much better prognostic ability in ARDS as compared to P/F ratio. The aim of this study was to correlate SpO2 10/FiO2 PEEP (S/FP10) to PaO2 10/FiO2 PEEP (P/FP10) and evaluate the utility of S/FP10 as a reliable noninvasive indicator of oxygenation in ARDS to avoid repeated arterial blood sampling.

Aim: To evaluate if pulse oximetry is a reliable indicator of oxygenation in ARDS patients by calculating SpO2 10/FiO2 PEEP (S/FP10). The primary objective was to determine the correlation of S/FP10 to P/FP10 ratio in ARDS patients. The secondary objective was to determine the cut-off value of S/FP10 ratio to predict severe ARDS and survival.

Methods: Patients aged 18-80 years on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) diagnosed with ARDS as defined by the Berlin definition were included. The values of PaO2, FiO2, and SpO2 were collected at three different time points. They were at baseline, i.e., after intubation and initiation of MV (within one hour of intubation), day one (1-24 hours of MV), and day three (48-72 hours of MV). The primary outcome was survival at the end of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

Results: A total of 85 patients with ARDS on invasive MV were included. The data points were obtained at baseline, day one, and day three of MV. S/FP10 ratio has an excellent correlation to P/FP10 ratio at baseline and day three of invasive MV (r = 0.831 and 0.853, respectively; p < 0.001) and has a strong correlation on day one of invasive MV (r = 0.733, p < 0.001). S/FP10 ratio ≤116 at baseline has excellent discriminant function to be categorized as severe ARDS as per Berlin definition (AUC: 0.925, p < 0.001, 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity, CI: [0.862-0.988]). The increase in S/FP10 ratio by ≥64.40 from baseline to day three of MV is a good predictor of survival (AUC: 0.877, p < 0.001, 73.5% sensitivity, 97% specificity, CI: [0.803-0.952]).

Conclusion: S/FP10 has a strong correlation to P/FP10 in ARDS patients. S/FP10 ≤116 has an excellent discriminant function to be categorized as severe ARDS. The S/FP10 ratio on day three of MV and the change in S/FP10 ratio from baseline and day one to day three of MV are good predictors of survival in ARDS patients. This trial is registered with CTRI/2020/04/024940.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)结合呼气末正压(SpO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP)在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的分类和预后中的应用
背景:传统上,PaO2/FiO2 (P/F比值)被用来划分急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的严重程度和预后。最近的文献表明,将呼气末正压(PEEP)纳入P/F比(PaO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP或P/FP∗10)与P/F比相比,在ARDS中具有更好的预后能力。本研究的目的是将SpO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP (S/FP∗10)与PaO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP (P/FP∗10)联系起来,并评估S/FP∗10作为ARDS中可靠的无创氧合指标的有效性,以避免重复的动脉血液采样。目的:通过计算SpO2∗10/FiO2∗PEEP (S/FP∗10),评价脉搏血氧仪是否是ARDS患者氧合的可靠指标。主要目的是确定ARDS患者S/FP∗10与P/FP∗10比值的相关性。次要目的是确定S/FP * 10比值的临界值,以预测严重ARDS和生存。方法:纳入年龄18 ~ 80岁经有创机械通气(MV)诊断为Berlin定义的ARDS患者。在三个不同的时间点采集PaO2、FiO2和SpO2的值。他们处于基线,即插管和MV开始后(插管1小时内),第一天(MV 1-24小时)和第三天(MV 48-72小时)。主要终点是重症监护病房(ICU)结束时的生存。结果:共纳入85例有创MV急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。数据点在基线、第一天和第三天获得。S/FP∗10比值与基线和侵袭性MV第3天的P/FP∗10比值有极好的相关性(r分别为0.831和0.853;p < 0.001),且与有创MV发病第1天相关性较强(r = 0.733, p < 0.001)。S/FP * 10在基线时≤116具有良好的判别功能,根据柏林定义将其归类为严重ARDS (AUC: 0.925, p < 0.001, 90%敏感性,93%特异性,CI:[0.862-0.988])。S/FP * 10比值从基线到MV第3天增加≥64.40是一个很好的生存预测因子(AUC: 0.877, p < 0.001,敏感性73.5%,特异性97%,CI:[0.803-0.952])。结论:ARDS患者S/FP∗10与P/FP∗10有较强相关性。S/FP * 10≤116对严重ARDS有很好的判别功能。术后第3天的S/FP∗10比值以及术后第1天至第3天S/FP∗10比值的变化是ARDS患者生存的良好预测指标。该试验注册号为CTRI/2020/04/024940。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信