Gene flow biases population genetic inference of recombination rate.

IF 2.2
Kieran Samuk, Mohamed A F Noor
{"title":"Gene flow biases population genetic inference of recombination rate.","authors":"Kieran Samuk,&nbsp;Mohamed A F Noor","doi":"10.1093/g3journal/jkac236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate estimates of the rate of recombination are key to understanding a host of evolutionary processes as well as the evolution of the recombination rate itself. Model-based population genetic methods that infer recombination rates from patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the genome have become a popular method to estimate rates of recombination. However, these linkage disequilibrium-based methods make a variety of simplifying assumptions about the populations of interest that are often not met in natural populations. One such assumption is the absence of gene flow from other populations. Here, we use forward-time population genetic simulations of isolation-with-migration scenarios to explore how gene flow affects the accuracy of linkage disequilibrium-based estimators of recombination rate. We find that moderate levels of gene flow can result in either the overestimation or underestimation of recombination rates by up to 20-50% depending on the timing of divergence. We also find that these biases can affect the detection of interpopulation differences in recombination rate, causing both false positives and false negatives depending on the scenario. We discuss future possibilities for mitigating these biases and recommend that investigators exercise caution and confirm that their study populations meet assumptions before deploying these methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":520629,"journal":{"name":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635666/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Accurate estimates of the rate of recombination are key to understanding a host of evolutionary processes as well as the evolution of the recombination rate itself. Model-based population genetic methods that infer recombination rates from patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the genome have become a popular method to estimate rates of recombination. However, these linkage disequilibrium-based methods make a variety of simplifying assumptions about the populations of interest that are often not met in natural populations. One such assumption is the absence of gene flow from other populations. Here, we use forward-time population genetic simulations of isolation-with-migration scenarios to explore how gene flow affects the accuracy of linkage disequilibrium-based estimators of recombination rate. We find that moderate levels of gene flow can result in either the overestimation or underestimation of recombination rates by up to 20-50% depending on the timing of divergence. We also find that these biases can affect the detection of interpopulation differences in recombination rate, causing both false positives and false negatives depending on the scenario. We discuss future possibilities for mitigating these biases and recommend that investigators exercise caution and confirm that their study populations meet assumptions before deploying these methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基因流动偏差对重组率的群体遗传推断。
准确估计重组率是理解一系列进化过程以及重组率本身进化的关键。基于模型的群体遗传方法从基因组中的连锁不平衡模式推断重组率,已成为估计重组率的一种流行方法。然而,这些基于连锁不平衡的方法对感兴趣的种群做出了各种简化的假设,而这些假设在自然种群中往往不满足。其中一个假设是没有来自其他种群的基因流。在这里,我们使用前向时间群体遗传模拟的隔离与迁移情景来探索基因流动如何影响基于连锁不平衡的重组率估计的准确性。我们发现,中等水平的基因流动可能导致重组率的高估或低估高达20-50%,这取决于分化的时间。我们还发现,这些偏差会影响种群间重组率差异的检测,根据不同的情况导致假阳性和假阴性。我们讨论了未来减轻这些偏差的可能性,并建议研究者在采用这些方法之前谨慎行事,并确认他们的研究人群符合假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书