Using data-driven algorithms for semi-automated geomorphological mapping.

IF 3.6
Elisa Giaccone, Fabio Oriani, Marj Tonini, Christophe Lambiel, Grégoire Mariéthoz
{"title":"Using data-driven algorithms for semi-automated geomorphological mapping.","authors":"Elisa Giaccone,&nbsp;Fabio Oriani,&nbsp;Marj Tonini,&nbsp;Christophe Lambiel,&nbsp;Grégoire Mariéthoz","doi":"10.1007/s00477-021-02062-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we compare the performance of two data-driven algorithms to deal with an automatic classification problem in geomorphology: Direct Sampling (DS) and Random Forest (RF). The main goal is to provide a semi-automated procedure for the geomorphological mapping of alpine environments, using a manually mapped zone as training dataset and predictor variables to infer the classification of a target zone. The applicability of DS to geomorphological classification was never investigated before. Instead, RF based classification has already been applied in few studies, but only with a limited number of geomorphological classes. The outcomes of both approaches are validated by comparing the eight detected classes with a geomorphological map elaborated on the field and considered as ground truth. Both DS and RF give satisfactory results and provide similar performances in term of accuracy and Cohen's Kappa values. The map obtained with RF presents a noisier spatial distribution of classes than when using DS, because DS takes into account the spatial dependence of the different classes. Results suggest that DS and RF are both suitable techniques for the semi-automated geomorphological mapping in alpine environments at regional scale, opening the way for further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":520782,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal","volume":" ","pages":"2115-2131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463315/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02062-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the performance of two data-driven algorithms to deal with an automatic classification problem in geomorphology: Direct Sampling (DS) and Random Forest (RF). The main goal is to provide a semi-automated procedure for the geomorphological mapping of alpine environments, using a manually mapped zone as training dataset and predictor variables to infer the classification of a target zone. The applicability of DS to geomorphological classification was never investigated before. Instead, RF based classification has already been applied in few studies, but only with a limited number of geomorphological classes. The outcomes of both approaches are validated by comparing the eight detected classes with a geomorphological map elaborated on the field and considered as ground truth. Both DS and RF give satisfactory results and provide similar performances in term of accuracy and Cohen's Kappa values. The map obtained with RF presents a noisier spatial distribution of classes than when using DS, because DS takes into account the spatial dependence of the different classes. Results suggest that DS and RF are both suitable techniques for the semi-automated geomorphological mapping in alpine environments at regional scale, opening the way for further improvements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用数据驱动算法进行半自动地貌制图。
本文比较了直接抽样(DS)和随机森林(RF)两种数据驱动的地貌学自动分类算法的性能。主要目标是为高山环境的地貌映射提供一个半自动的过程,使用手动映射的区域作为训练数据集和预测变量来推断目标区域的分类。DS在地貌分类中的适用性从未被研究过。相反,基于RF的分类已经在少数研究中得到应用,但仅限于数量有限的地貌类别。两种方法的结果都是通过将8种检测到的类别与实地制作的地貌图进行比较来验证的,地貌图被认为是真实的。DS和RF都给出了令人满意的结果,并且在精度和Cohen’s Kappa值方面提供了相似的性能。与使用DS相比,使用RF获得的地图呈现出更嘈杂的类别空间分布,因为DS考虑了不同类别的空间依赖性。结果表明,在区域尺度上,DS和RF技术都适合用于高寒环境半自动化地貌制图,为进一步改进开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书